“一个饥饿、衣衫褴褛、被遗弃的小男孩”:《月光石》和《四人标志》中街头阿拉伯人的意义

IF 0.6 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES Dickens Studies Annual Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.5325/dickstudannu.53.1.0020
Sharon R. Murphy
{"title":"“一个饥饿、衣衫褴褛、被遗弃的小男孩”:《月光石》和《四人标志》中街头阿拉伯人的意义","authors":"Sharon R. Murphy","doi":"10.5325/dickstudannu.53.1.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article illuminates the significance of the “little English boy” who accompanies the Brahmin priests in The Moonstone (1868), demonstrating that he functions as what Neil Cocks would describe as a “peripheral” child within Collins's novel (2014). It shows that close engagement with this child uncovers a complex set of relations at work within The Moonstone—one that illuminates, or conjures up, the kind of child poverty that was becoming increasingly visible at the time(s) when the novel was both published and set. The article also considers the importance of Collins's Gooseberry in this regard and, linked to this, the significance of Arthur Conan Doyle's creation of his Irregulars. It argues that Doyle's and Holmes's “employment” of these street children must be contextualized in relation to the kind of child labor—and exploitation—that was both endemic and increasingly problematic in late-nineteenth-century London. The overall ambition of the article is to demonstrate what is “disrupted,” to use Cocks's term, once we properly register the “peripheral” or “shadowy” children in The Moonstone and The Sign of Four, respectively.","PeriodicalId":53232,"journal":{"name":"Dickens Studies Annual","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“[A] hungry, ragged, and forsaken little boy”: The Significance of the Street Arab(s) in The Moonstone and The Sign of Four\",\"authors\":\"Sharon R. Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/dickstudannu.53.1.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article illuminates the significance of the “little English boy” who accompanies the Brahmin priests in The Moonstone (1868), demonstrating that he functions as what Neil Cocks would describe as a “peripheral” child within Collins's novel (2014). It shows that close engagement with this child uncovers a complex set of relations at work within The Moonstone—one that illuminates, or conjures up, the kind of child poverty that was becoming increasingly visible at the time(s) when the novel was both published and set. The article also considers the importance of Collins's Gooseberry in this regard and, linked to this, the significance of Arthur Conan Doyle's creation of his Irregulars. It argues that Doyle's and Holmes's “employment” of these street children must be contextualized in relation to the kind of child labor—and exploitation—that was both endemic and increasingly problematic in late-nineteenth-century London. The overall ambition of the article is to demonstrate what is “disrupted,” to use Cocks's term, once we properly register the “peripheral” or “shadowy” children in The Moonstone and The Sign of Four, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dickens Studies Annual\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dickens Studies Annual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/dickstudannu.53.1.0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dickens Studies Annual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/dickstudannu.53.1.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章阐明了《月亮石》(1868)中陪伴婆罗门牧师的“英国小男孩”的意义,证明了他在柯林斯的小说(2014)中扮演着尼尔·科克斯所说的“边缘”儿童的角色。它表明,与这个孩子的密切接触揭示了《月亮石》中一系列复杂的关系——这种关系照亮或唤起了在小说出版和背景设定时越来越明显的儿童贫困。文章还考虑了柯林斯的《醋栗》在这方面的重要性,以及与此相关的阿瑟·柯南·道尔创作《非正规军》的意义。它认为,Doyle和Holmes对这些街头儿童的“雇佣”必须与童工和剥削联系起来,童工和剥削在19世纪末的伦敦既普遍存在,也越来越成问题。这篇文章的总体目标是,一旦我们分别在《月亮石》和《四个人的标志》中正确地登记了“外围”或“阴影”儿童,用Cocks的话说,展示什么是“被破坏的”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“[A] hungry, ragged, and forsaken little boy”: The Significance of the Street Arab(s) in The Moonstone and The Sign of Four
This article illuminates the significance of the “little English boy” who accompanies the Brahmin priests in The Moonstone (1868), demonstrating that he functions as what Neil Cocks would describe as a “peripheral” child within Collins's novel (2014). It shows that close engagement with this child uncovers a complex set of relations at work within The Moonstone—one that illuminates, or conjures up, the kind of child poverty that was becoming increasingly visible at the time(s) when the novel was both published and set. The article also considers the importance of Collins's Gooseberry in this regard and, linked to this, the significance of Arthur Conan Doyle's creation of his Irregulars. It argues that Doyle's and Holmes's “employment” of these street children must be contextualized in relation to the kind of child labor—and exploitation—that was both endemic and increasingly problematic in late-nineteenth-century London. The overall ambition of the article is to demonstrate what is “disrupted,” to use Cocks's term, once we properly register the “peripheral” or “shadowy” children in The Moonstone and The Sign of Four, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dickens Studies Annual
Dickens Studies Annual LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
自引率
87.50%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Interview with Michael Hollington, the Anti-Specialist The Queer Lives of Victorian Feminist Criticism Figuring Tough Subjects: Vague Labor and Narratorial Detection in Bleak House Noncanonical Victorian Women Novelists in the Twenty-First Century: Reconsidering Recovery Work Recent Dickens Studies 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1