Shabnam ShahAli, S. Shahabi, Noushin Kohan, Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani, R. Ebrahimi
{"title":"使用电子学习方法进行物理治疗学生学习——对知识、技能、满意度和态度影响的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Shabnam ShahAli, S. Shahabi, Noushin Kohan, Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani, R. Ebrahimi","doi":"10.1080/21679169.2022.2085789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim To assess the effectiveness of e-learning methods in comparison with traditional learning on physiotherapy students’ knowledge, skills and satisfaction/attitude. Methods Seven databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, Ovid SP and Cochrane were searched until October 2021. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared e-learning with traditional learning or another form of digital education among physiotherapy students and assessed knowledge, skills and satisfaction/attitude were included. Cochrane effective practice and organisation of care tool was used to assess risk of bias. Results Nineteen RCTs were included. The results suggested that blended learning approach is better than traditional methods for improving skills and satisfaction/attitude in physiotherapy students, with moderate to low level of evidence. There was no difference between blended learning and traditional learning for knowledge acquisition. Pure e-learning revealed an equal result with traditional learning in all measured outcomes. Due to limited number of studies that compared one e-learning method with another form of digital education, the findings were inconclusive. Conclusion e-Learning methods made changes in knowledge, skills, satisfaction/attitude. Based on moderate to low evidence, blended learning method may be more effective than traditional learning in terms of skill acquisition and satisfaction/attitude.","PeriodicalId":45694,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using e-learning methods for physiotherapy students learning – a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact on knowledge, skills, satisfaction and attitudes\",\"authors\":\"Shabnam ShahAli, S. Shahabi, Noushin Kohan, Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani, R. Ebrahimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21679169.2022.2085789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Aim To assess the effectiveness of e-learning methods in comparison with traditional learning on physiotherapy students’ knowledge, skills and satisfaction/attitude. Methods Seven databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, Ovid SP and Cochrane were searched until October 2021. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared e-learning with traditional learning or another form of digital education among physiotherapy students and assessed knowledge, skills and satisfaction/attitude were included. Cochrane effective practice and organisation of care tool was used to assess risk of bias. Results Nineteen RCTs were included. The results suggested that blended learning approach is better than traditional methods for improving skills and satisfaction/attitude in physiotherapy students, with moderate to low level of evidence. There was no difference between blended learning and traditional learning for knowledge acquisition. Pure e-learning revealed an equal result with traditional learning in all measured outcomes. Due to limited number of studies that compared one e-learning method with another form of digital education, the findings were inconclusive. Conclusion e-Learning methods made changes in knowledge, skills, satisfaction/attitude. Based on moderate to low evidence, blended learning method may be more effective than traditional learning in terms of skill acquisition and satisfaction/attitude.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2022.2085789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2022.2085789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
摘要目的评估电子学习方法与传统学习方法在物理治疗学生知识、技能和满意度/态度方面的有效性。方法检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus、ProQuest、Ovid SP和Cochrane等7个数据库,直至2021年10月。随机对照试验(RCT)将物理治疗学生的电子学习与传统学习或其他形式的数字教育进行了比较,并评估了知识、技能和满意度/态度。使用Cochrane有效实践和护理组织工具来评估偏倚风险。结果纳入19项随机对照试验。研究结果表明,在提高物理治疗学生的技能和满意度/态度方面,混合学习方法优于传统方法,证据水平从中到低。混合学习和传统学习在知识获取方面没有区别。纯电子学习在所有衡量结果方面都显示出与传统学习相同的结果。由于将一种电子学习方法与另一种形式的数字教育进行比较的研究数量有限,研究结果没有结论。结论电子学习方法在知识、技能、满意度/态度等方面发生了变化。基于中低证据,混合学习方法在技能获取和满意度/态度方面可能比传统学习更有效。
Using e-learning methods for physiotherapy students learning – a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact on knowledge, skills, satisfaction and attitudes
Abstract Aim To assess the effectiveness of e-learning methods in comparison with traditional learning on physiotherapy students’ knowledge, skills and satisfaction/attitude. Methods Seven databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, Ovid SP and Cochrane were searched until October 2021. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared e-learning with traditional learning or another form of digital education among physiotherapy students and assessed knowledge, skills and satisfaction/attitude were included. Cochrane effective practice and organisation of care tool was used to assess risk of bias. Results Nineteen RCTs were included. The results suggested that blended learning approach is better than traditional methods for improving skills and satisfaction/attitude in physiotherapy students, with moderate to low level of evidence. There was no difference between blended learning and traditional learning for knowledge acquisition. Pure e-learning revealed an equal result with traditional learning in all measured outcomes. Due to limited number of studies that compared one e-learning method with another form of digital education, the findings were inconclusive. Conclusion e-Learning methods made changes in knowledge, skills, satisfaction/attitude. Based on moderate to low evidence, blended learning method may be more effective than traditional learning in terms of skill acquisition and satisfaction/attitude.