建立健康科学校园科研数据管理服务

Kathryn Vela, Nancy Shin
{"title":"建立健康科学校园科研数据管理服务","authors":"Kathryn Vela, Nancy Shin","doi":"10.7191/JESLIB.2019.1146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : Given the increasing need for research data management support and education, the Spokane Academic Library at Washington State University (WSU) sought to determine the data management practices, perceptions, and needs of researchers on the WSU Spokane health sciences campus. Methods : A 23-question online survey was distributed to WSU researchers and research support staff through the campus listserv. This online survey addressed data organization, documentation, storage & backup, security, preservation, and sharing, as well as challenges and desired support services. Results : Survey results indicated that there was a clear need for more instruction with regard to data management planning, particularly as data management planning addresses the areas of metadata design, data sharing, data security, and data storage and backup. Conclusions : This needs assessment will direct how RDM services are implemented on the WSU Spokane campus by the Spokane Academic Library (SAL). These services will influence both research data quality and integrity through improved data management practices. The data reveal some interesting inconsistencies in respondent behaviors and attitudes around data sharing. Almost all of the respondents reported having funding from federal sources like the NIH, yet only 38% indicated that they plan to share their data at the conclusion of their research project. This seems to agree with data collected from other RDM needs assessments; Buys and Shaw (2015) found that 34% of the researchers from the school of medicine on their campus share or plan to share their data, and approximately 30% of the medical sciences researchers surveyed by Akers and Doty (2013) planned to share their data. Additionally, when asked how much they agree that it is important to openly share their data with others, 65% of the respondents indicated that they somewhat or strongly agree, which is almost double the percentage of respondents who actually intend to make their data publicly available.","PeriodicalId":90214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of escience librarianship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing a Research Data Management Service on a Health Sciences Campus\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Vela, Nancy Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.7191/JESLIB.2019.1146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective : Given the increasing need for research data management support and education, the Spokane Academic Library at Washington State University (WSU) sought to determine the data management practices, perceptions, and needs of researchers on the WSU Spokane health sciences campus. Methods : A 23-question online survey was distributed to WSU researchers and research support staff through the campus listserv. This online survey addressed data organization, documentation, storage & backup, security, preservation, and sharing, as well as challenges and desired support services. Results : Survey results indicated that there was a clear need for more instruction with regard to data management planning, particularly as data management planning addresses the areas of metadata design, data sharing, data security, and data storage and backup. Conclusions : This needs assessment will direct how RDM services are implemented on the WSU Spokane campus by the Spokane Academic Library (SAL). These services will influence both research data quality and integrity through improved data management practices. The data reveal some interesting inconsistencies in respondent behaviors and attitudes around data sharing. Almost all of the respondents reported having funding from federal sources like the NIH, yet only 38% indicated that they plan to share their data at the conclusion of their research project. This seems to agree with data collected from other RDM needs assessments; Buys and Shaw (2015) found that 34% of the researchers from the school of medicine on their campus share or plan to share their data, and approximately 30% of the medical sciences researchers surveyed by Akers and Doty (2013) planned to share their data. Additionally, when asked how much they agree that it is important to openly share their data with others, 65% of the respondents indicated that they somewhat or strongly agree, which is almost double the percentage of respondents who actually intend to make their data publicly available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of escience librarianship\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of escience librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7191/JESLIB.2019.1146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of escience librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7191/JESLIB.2019.1146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:鉴于对研究数据管理支持和教育的需求日益增加,华盛顿州立大学斯波坎学术图书馆(WSU)试图确定WSU斯波坎健康科学校区研究人员的数据管理实践、看法和需求。方法:通过校园listserv向华盛顿州立大学的研究人员和研究支持人员发放23个问题的在线调查。这项在线调查涉及数据组织、文档、存储和备份、安全、保存和共享,以及挑战和所需的支持服务。结果:调查结果表明,在数据管理规划方面显然需要更多的指导,特别是在数据管理规划涉及元数据设计、数据共享、数据安全以及数据存储和备份等领域时。结论:该需求评估将指导斯波坎学术图书馆(SAL)如何在华盛顿州立大学斯波坎校区实施RDM服务。这些服务将通过改进数据管理实践来影响研究数据的质量和完整性。数据显示,受访者在数据共享方面的行为和态度存在一些有趣的不一致。几乎所有的受访者都表示从美国国立卫生研究院等联邦机构获得了资金,但只有38%的人表示他们计划在研究项目结束时分享他们的数据。这似乎与从其他RDM需求评估中收集的数据一致;Buys和Shaw(2015)发现,34%的医学院研究人员在他们的校园共享或计划共享他们的数据,Akers和Doty(2013)调查的医学研究人员中约有30%计划共享他们的数据。此外,当被问及他们在多大程度上同意与他人公开分享数据的重要性时,65%的受访者表示他们多少同意或强烈同意,这几乎是实际打算公开数据的受访者比例的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Establishing a Research Data Management Service on a Health Sciences Campus
Objective : Given the increasing need for research data management support and education, the Spokane Academic Library at Washington State University (WSU) sought to determine the data management practices, perceptions, and needs of researchers on the WSU Spokane health sciences campus. Methods : A 23-question online survey was distributed to WSU researchers and research support staff through the campus listserv. This online survey addressed data organization, documentation, storage & backup, security, preservation, and sharing, as well as challenges and desired support services. Results : Survey results indicated that there was a clear need for more instruction with regard to data management planning, particularly as data management planning addresses the areas of metadata design, data sharing, data security, and data storage and backup. Conclusions : This needs assessment will direct how RDM services are implemented on the WSU Spokane campus by the Spokane Academic Library (SAL). These services will influence both research data quality and integrity through improved data management practices. The data reveal some interesting inconsistencies in respondent behaviors and attitudes around data sharing. Almost all of the respondents reported having funding from federal sources like the NIH, yet only 38% indicated that they plan to share their data at the conclusion of their research project. This seems to agree with data collected from other RDM needs assessments; Buys and Shaw (2015) found that 34% of the researchers from the school of medicine on their campus share or plan to share their data, and approximately 30% of the medical sciences researchers surveyed by Akers and Doty (2013) planned to share their data. Additionally, when asked how much they agree that it is important to openly share their data with others, 65% of the respondents indicated that they somewhat or strongly agree, which is almost double the percentage of respondents who actually intend to make their data publicly available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ethical considerations in utilizing artificial intelligence for analyzing the NHGRI's History of Genomics and Human Genome Project archives. The Creative Urge Title Pending 740 A Problem Shared Is a Community Created: Recommendations for Cross-Institutional Collaborations. Train the Teacher: Practical guidance for effective, critical teaching approaches for science and data librarians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1