国家民族主义还是民众民族主义?分析印度主流电视新闻频道对TikTok禁令的媒体报道

Q2 Social Sciences Media Asia Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1080/01296612.2023.2212507
Ajay Kumar
{"title":"国家民族主义还是民众民族主义?分析印度主流电视新闻频道对TikTok禁令的媒体报道","authors":"Ajay Kumar","doi":"10.1080/01296612.2023.2212507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract It has been argued that BJP - the current ruling party of India - comprises unapologetic hyper nationalists known as Hindu nationalists. It has also been claimed that the BJP government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi has a tight grip over the mainstream TV media and non-conformists are finding it increasingly challenging to express their opinion in the world’s largest democracy. If such concerns are true, then support for the nationalist politics of the ruling dispensation must reflect in the mainstream media narratives. To explore, this study conducted a thematic discourse analysis on the media coverage of the TikTok ban in India post Indo-China border conflict. Results revealed a prevalence of media support for state nationalism as interests of the state were conflated with public interest – in contrast with the normative assumptions of objective journalism. However, the study did not find any evidence of popular nationalism on this occasion.","PeriodicalId":53411,"journal":{"name":"Media Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State nationalism or popular nationalism? Analysing media coverage of TikTok ban on mainstream Indian TV news channels\",\"authors\":\"Ajay Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01296612.2023.2212507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract It has been argued that BJP - the current ruling party of India - comprises unapologetic hyper nationalists known as Hindu nationalists. It has also been claimed that the BJP government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi has a tight grip over the mainstream TV media and non-conformists are finding it increasingly challenging to express their opinion in the world’s largest democracy. If such concerns are true, then support for the nationalist politics of the ruling dispensation must reflect in the mainstream media narratives. To explore, this study conducted a thematic discourse analysis on the media coverage of the TikTok ban in India post Indo-China border conflict. Results revealed a prevalence of media support for state nationalism as interests of the state were conflated with public interest – in contrast with the normative assumptions of objective journalism. However, the study did not find any evidence of popular nationalism on this occasion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Media Asia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Media Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2023.2212507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2023.2212507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要有人认为,印度人民党——印度目前的执政党——包括被称为印度教民族主义者的毫无歉意的极端民族主义者。还有人声称,总理纳伦德拉·莫迪领导下的印度人民党政府对主流电视媒体有着严格的控制,不墨守成规的人发现在这个世界上最大的民主国家表达自己的观点越来越具有挑战性。如果这种担忧是真的,那么对统治体制的民族主义政治的支持必须反映在主流媒体的叙事中。为了探索,本研究对印度印中边境冲突后媒体对TikTok禁令的报道进行了主题话语分析。结果显示,媒体普遍支持国家民族主义,因为国家利益与公共利益混为一谈——这与客观新闻的规范假设形成了鲜明对比。然而,这项研究没有发现任何证据表明在这种情况下存在流行的民族主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State nationalism or popular nationalism? Analysing media coverage of TikTok ban on mainstream Indian TV news channels
Abstract It has been argued that BJP - the current ruling party of India - comprises unapologetic hyper nationalists known as Hindu nationalists. It has also been claimed that the BJP government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi has a tight grip over the mainstream TV media and non-conformists are finding it increasingly challenging to express their opinion in the world’s largest democracy. If such concerns are true, then support for the nationalist politics of the ruling dispensation must reflect in the mainstream media narratives. To explore, this study conducted a thematic discourse analysis on the media coverage of the TikTok ban in India post Indo-China border conflict. Results revealed a prevalence of media support for state nationalism as interests of the state were conflated with public interest – in contrast with the normative assumptions of objective journalism. However, the study did not find any evidence of popular nationalism on this occasion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Media Asia
Media Asia Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Media coverage of domestic violence-related issues in China The effects of technology readiness, risks, and benefits on smart home technology adoption: extending the Theory of Planned Behavior model Trial by media and the freedom of expression: review of the web series The Trial: Pyaar Kaanoon Dhokha Generation Z and late millennials lost in the world of online illusion: review of the film Kho Gaye Ham Kahan The watchdog navigates to bark: investigative reporting on corruption in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1