痴呆症的康复:CST和Sonas小组对中度认知障碍患者的干预。试点研究

Q3 Health Professions Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2022-04-06 DOI:10.1108/ijot-08-2021-0019
O. Dolan, Joanne O’Halloran, M. O’Cuill, Atiqa Rafiq, Jennifer Edgeworth, Michael Hogan, A. Shiel
{"title":"痴呆症的康复:CST和Sonas小组对中度认知障碍患者的干预。试点研究","authors":"O. Dolan, Joanne O’Halloran, M. O’Cuill, Atiqa Rafiq, Jennifer Edgeworth, Michael Hogan, A. Shiel","doi":"10.1108/ijot-08-2021-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDementia is a complex, progressively degenerative condition. It results in loss of cognitive and functional capabilities, along with a significant increase in the level of dependency. A reduction in the use of pharmacological interventions correlates with an increased in good quality non-pharmacological interventions in dementia care. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of 14-session face-to-face cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) and Sonas group interventions on individuals living with dementia with moderate cognitive impairment, from pre-intervention to post-intervention in terms of their cognition, communication, neuropsychiatric symptoms, activities of daily living and quality of life.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA pilot single blind prospective controlled trial evaluated two group intervention approaches, cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) and Sonas, with 28 participants with moderate dementia. Pseudorandomisation and single blinding were implemented. CST has a solid evidence base. Sonas is a widely used multi-sensory intervention in Ireland with an emerging evidence base. Participants were recruited from a mental health service. Participants who had a formal diagnosis of dementia, moderate cognitive impairment and some ability to communicate and understand communication were included.\n\n\nFindings\nResults supported CST to a greater extent than Sonas. The CST group showed significant changes in cognition (p = 0.032) and communication (p = 0.006). Both groups had significant changes in carer quality of life (CST, p = 0.019; Sonas, p = 0.035). Results support the recommendations for a future definitive trial.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nRehabilitation potential of individuals living with moderate dementia was demonstrated. This study suggests that group interventions like these impact on the trajectory of dementia.\n\n\nPractical implications\nRehabilitation interventions impact on the trajectory of dementia. CST and Sonas have no impact on activities of daily living. Future studies with larger sample sizes, 16 weeks intervention period and control groups are required.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis pilot study supports CST over Sonas interventions for individuals living with moderate dementia. Multiple outcome measures demonstrated trends towards significance for both interventions. Future definitive trials may detect a significant effect of both interventions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nA dementia diagnosis is devastating and generally creates negative perceptions and associations (Alvira, 2014). In contrast, the outcomes of this study are positive. This study provides evidence that occupational therapist intervention can impact on the trajectory of the condition with people with dementia demonstrating that they do have rehabilitation potential by responding to treatment and improving and maintaining their abilities as they progress through the condition.\n","PeriodicalId":36571,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rehabilitation in dementia: CST and Sonas group interventions for people with moderate cognitive impairment. A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"O. Dolan, Joanne O’Halloran, M. O’Cuill, Atiqa Rafiq, Jennifer Edgeworth, Michael Hogan, A. Shiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijot-08-2021-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nDementia is a complex, progressively degenerative condition. It results in loss of cognitive and functional capabilities, along with a significant increase in the level of dependency. A reduction in the use of pharmacological interventions correlates with an increased in good quality non-pharmacological interventions in dementia care. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of 14-session face-to-face cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) and Sonas group interventions on individuals living with dementia with moderate cognitive impairment, from pre-intervention to post-intervention in terms of their cognition, communication, neuropsychiatric symptoms, activities of daily living and quality of life.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA pilot single blind prospective controlled trial evaluated two group intervention approaches, cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) and Sonas, with 28 participants with moderate dementia. Pseudorandomisation and single blinding were implemented. CST has a solid evidence base. Sonas is a widely used multi-sensory intervention in Ireland with an emerging evidence base. Participants were recruited from a mental health service. Participants who had a formal diagnosis of dementia, moderate cognitive impairment and some ability to communicate and understand communication were included.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nResults supported CST to a greater extent than Sonas. The CST group showed significant changes in cognition (p = 0.032) and communication (p = 0.006). Both groups had significant changes in carer quality of life (CST, p = 0.019; Sonas, p = 0.035). Results support the recommendations for a future definitive trial.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nRehabilitation potential of individuals living with moderate dementia was demonstrated. This study suggests that group interventions like these impact on the trajectory of dementia.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nRehabilitation interventions impact on the trajectory of dementia. CST and Sonas have no impact on activities of daily living. Future studies with larger sample sizes, 16 weeks intervention period and control groups are required.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThis pilot study supports CST over Sonas interventions for individuals living with moderate dementia. Multiple outcome measures demonstrated trends towards significance for both interventions. Future definitive trials may detect a significant effect of both interventions.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nA dementia diagnosis is devastating and generally creates negative perceptions and associations (Alvira, 2014). In contrast, the outcomes of this study are positive. This study provides evidence that occupational therapist intervention can impact on the trajectory of the condition with people with dementia demonstrating that they do have rehabilitation potential by responding to treatment and improving and maintaining their abilities as they progress through the condition.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijot-08-2021-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijot-08-2021-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的痴呆症是一种复杂的、进行性退行性疾病。它导致认知和功能能力的丧失,同时依赖程度显著增加。药物干预的使用减少与痴呆症护理中高质量非药物干预的增加相关。本研究的目的是检验14次面对面认知刺激疗法(CST)和Sonas小组干预对患有中度认知障碍的痴呆症患者的影响,从干预前到干预后,从认知、沟通、神经精神症状、日常生活活动和生活质量方面进行。设计/方法/方法一项先导性单盲前瞻性对照试验评估了两种群体干预方法,认知刺激疗法(CST)和Sonas,共有28名中度痴呆患者。采用伪随机和单盲法。CST有坚实的证据基础。声纳是一种在爱尔兰广泛使用的多感官干预措施,有着新兴的证据基础。参与者是从心理健康服务机构招募的。参与者被正式诊断为痴呆症、中度认知障碍以及一定的沟通和理解能力。FindingsResults比Sonas在更大程度上支持CST。CST组在认知(p=0.032)和沟通(p=0.006)方面发生了显著变化。两组的护理人员生活质量都发生了显著改变(CST,p=0.019;Sonas,p=0.035)。结果支持未来最终试验的建议。研究局限性/影响证明了中度痴呆患者的康复潜力。这项研究表明,像这样的群体干预措施会影响痴呆症的发展轨迹。实际意义康复干预对痴呆症发展轨迹的影响。CST和Sonas对日常生活活动没有影响。更大样本量的未来研究,16 需要周的干预期和对照组。社会影响这项试点研究支持CST对中度痴呆患者的Sonas干预。多项成果衡量指标表明,这两项干预措施都具有重要意义。未来的决定性试验可能会发现这两种干预措施的显著效果。独创性/价值痴呆症的诊断是毁灭性的,通常会产生负面的看法和联想(Alvira,2014)。相比之下,这项研究的结果是积极的。这项研究提供了证据,证明职业治疗师的干预可以影响痴呆症患者的病情发展轨迹,表明他们确实有康复潜力,通过对治疗做出反应,并在病情发展过程中提高和保持自己的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rehabilitation in dementia: CST and Sonas group interventions for people with moderate cognitive impairment. A pilot study
Purpose Dementia is a complex, progressively degenerative condition. It results in loss of cognitive and functional capabilities, along with a significant increase in the level of dependency. A reduction in the use of pharmacological interventions correlates with an increased in good quality non-pharmacological interventions in dementia care. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of 14-session face-to-face cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) and Sonas group interventions on individuals living with dementia with moderate cognitive impairment, from pre-intervention to post-intervention in terms of their cognition, communication, neuropsychiatric symptoms, activities of daily living and quality of life. Design/methodology/approach A pilot single blind prospective controlled trial evaluated two group intervention approaches, cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) and Sonas, with 28 participants with moderate dementia. Pseudorandomisation and single blinding were implemented. CST has a solid evidence base. Sonas is a widely used multi-sensory intervention in Ireland with an emerging evidence base. Participants were recruited from a mental health service. Participants who had a formal diagnosis of dementia, moderate cognitive impairment and some ability to communicate and understand communication were included. Findings Results supported CST to a greater extent than Sonas. The CST group showed significant changes in cognition (p = 0.032) and communication (p = 0.006). Both groups had significant changes in carer quality of life (CST, p = 0.019; Sonas, p = 0.035). Results support the recommendations for a future definitive trial. Research limitations/implications Rehabilitation potential of individuals living with moderate dementia was demonstrated. This study suggests that group interventions like these impact on the trajectory of dementia. Practical implications Rehabilitation interventions impact on the trajectory of dementia. CST and Sonas have no impact on activities of daily living. Future studies with larger sample sizes, 16 weeks intervention period and control groups are required. Social implications This pilot study supports CST over Sonas interventions for individuals living with moderate dementia. Multiple outcome measures demonstrated trends towards significance for both interventions. Future definitive trials may detect a significant effect of both interventions. Originality/value A dementia diagnosis is devastating and generally creates negative perceptions and associations (Alvira, 2014). In contrast, the outcomes of this study are positive. This study provides evidence that occupational therapist intervention can impact on the trajectory of the condition with people with dementia demonstrating that they do have rehabilitation potential by responding to treatment and improving and maintaining their abilities as they progress through the condition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy
Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Driving innovation: harnessing the power of patient input in research Current clinical practice of Irish physiotherapists and occupational therapists in the assessment and treatment of spasticity in adults Scoping review of free evidence summary sources available online, relevant to occupational therapists working with children/youth, and families Exploring the non-vocational outcomes of the individual placement and support (IPS) employment model Attention Autism™ training for occupational therapists: a pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1