孟加拉国的数字经济与隐私保护:比较法律分析

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW IIUM Law Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-28 DOI:10.31436/IIUMLJ.V28I2.451
Mohsin Dhali, Sonny Zulhuda, S. Ismail
{"title":"孟加拉国的数字经济与隐私保护:比较法律分析","authors":"Mohsin Dhali, Sonny Zulhuda, S. Ismail","doi":"10.31436/IIUMLJ.V28I2.451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present unbridled advancement in the field of information and communication technology has resulted in individuals being thrust at a crossroad, where refusing to sacrifice one’s privacy would mean the denial of technological benefits. Concern for privacy begins once a \nchild is born into this world where the right to privacy could now be argued needs to be considered as one of the basic human rights similar to other inalienable rights such as the right to life and liberties. Bangladesh is one of the countries that has not given explicit recognition to the right of privacy. This is evident from the absence of explicit indications of the right to privacy in the Constitution of Bangladesh and judicial interventions make the constitutional protection of privacy questionable. The purpose of the present study is to find out whether the right to privacy is in fact recognized and \nprotected by the Constitution of Bangladesh by examining specific provisions in the Constitution of Bangladesh to locate provisions that could be relied on to show that a sliver of recognition could be given to the right of privacy in Bangladesh. This position is then compared to other jurisdictions, especially the common law jurisdictions. The study finds that although Article 43 of the Constitution guarantees limited protection that encompasses the right to privacy of home and correspondence but if read together with the right to life and liberty in Article 32, it could be argued that these are viable provisions in \nrecognizing the right to privacy under the Constitution of Bangladesh.","PeriodicalId":40704,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Law Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"567-596"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE DIGITAL ECONOMY AND THE QUEST FOR PRIVACY PROTECTION IN BANGLADESH: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"Mohsin Dhali, Sonny Zulhuda, S. Ismail\",\"doi\":\"10.31436/IIUMLJ.V28I2.451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present unbridled advancement in the field of information and communication technology has resulted in individuals being thrust at a crossroad, where refusing to sacrifice one’s privacy would mean the denial of technological benefits. Concern for privacy begins once a \\nchild is born into this world where the right to privacy could now be argued needs to be considered as one of the basic human rights similar to other inalienable rights such as the right to life and liberties. Bangladesh is one of the countries that has not given explicit recognition to the right of privacy. This is evident from the absence of explicit indications of the right to privacy in the Constitution of Bangladesh and judicial interventions make the constitutional protection of privacy questionable. The purpose of the present study is to find out whether the right to privacy is in fact recognized and \\nprotected by the Constitution of Bangladesh by examining specific provisions in the Constitution of Bangladesh to locate provisions that could be relied on to show that a sliver of recognition could be given to the right of privacy in Bangladesh. This position is then compared to other jurisdictions, especially the common law jurisdictions. The study finds that although Article 43 of the Constitution guarantees limited protection that encompasses the right to privacy of home and correspondence but if read together with the right to life and liberty in Article 32, it could be argued that these are viable provisions in \\nrecognizing the right to privacy under the Constitution of Bangladesh.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IIUM Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"567-596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IIUM Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31436/IIUMLJ.V28I2.451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/IIUMLJ.V28I2.451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前信息和通信技术领域的无节制发展导致个人被推到了十字路口,拒绝牺牲个人隐私就意味着剥夺技术利益。一旦孩子出生在这个世界上,隐私权就需要被视为一项基本人权,类似于生命权和自由权等其他不可剥夺的权利。孟加拉国是尚未明确承认隐私权的国家之一。孟加拉国《宪法》中没有明确规定隐私权,司法干预使宪法对隐私的保护受到质疑,这一点可见一斑。本研究的目的是通过审查《孟加拉国宪法》中的具体条款,找出可以用来证明孟加拉国可以对隐私权给予一点承认的条款,从而查明隐私权是否事实上得到了《孟加拉国宪法”的承认和保护。然后将这一立场与其他司法管辖区,特别是普通法司法管辖区进行比较。研究发现,尽管《宪法》第43条保障有限的保护,包括家庭隐私权和通信隐私权,但如果与第32条中的生命权和自由权一起阅读,可以说,这些是根据孟加拉国宪法承认隐私权的可行条款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE DIGITAL ECONOMY AND THE QUEST FOR PRIVACY PROTECTION IN BANGLADESH: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS
The present unbridled advancement in the field of information and communication technology has resulted in individuals being thrust at a crossroad, where refusing to sacrifice one’s privacy would mean the denial of technological benefits. Concern for privacy begins once a child is born into this world where the right to privacy could now be argued needs to be considered as one of the basic human rights similar to other inalienable rights such as the right to life and liberties. Bangladesh is one of the countries that has not given explicit recognition to the right of privacy. This is evident from the absence of explicit indications of the right to privacy in the Constitution of Bangladesh and judicial interventions make the constitutional protection of privacy questionable. The purpose of the present study is to find out whether the right to privacy is in fact recognized and protected by the Constitution of Bangladesh by examining specific provisions in the Constitution of Bangladesh to locate provisions that could be relied on to show that a sliver of recognition could be given to the right of privacy in Bangladesh. This position is then compared to other jurisdictions, especially the common law jurisdictions. The study finds that although Article 43 of the Constitution guarantees limited protection that encompasses the right to privacy of home and correspondence but if read together with the right to life and liberty in Article 32, it could be argued that these are viable provisions in recognizing the right to privacy under the Constitution of Bangladesh.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
GUESS EDITORS OPTIMISING WAQF LAW FOR EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1949 AND STATE WAQF ENACTMENTS BALANCING THE RIGHT OF GIG ECONOMY WORKERS IN THE CONTEXT OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING THE ISLAMIC LEGAL SYSTEM IN MALAYSIA: CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES A REVIEW OF THE MALAYSIAN JURISPRUDENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1