英国酒精许可决策中的公共卫生参与:导航“竞争空间”的重要性

IF 0.9 Q3 Psychology Drugs and Alcohol Today Pub Date : 2020-07-31 DOI:10.1108/dat-05-2020-0025
Linda Somerville, B. Thom, R. Herring
{"title":"英国酒精许可决策中的公共卫生参与:导航“竞争空间”的重要性","authors":"Linda Somerville, B. Thom, R. Herring","doi":"10.1108/dat-05-2020-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act of 2011, added ‘health bodies’ as responsible authorities in licensing and, in practice, Directors of Public Health undertook this role. Despite this legislation facilitating the inclusion of public health in partnerships around licensing in England, wide variations in involvement levels by Public Health professionals persist This article is based on the findings from interviews that explored the experiences of public health professionals engaging with local established partnerships around alcohol licensing. Qualitative data were collected through twenty-one interviews in a purposeful sample of London boroughs. These data were combined with analyses of relevant area documentation and observations of fourteen licensing sub-committee meetings in one London borough over a seven-month period. Thematic analysis of all data sources was conducted to identify emerging themes. \n \nThis study highlighted the importance of successful navigation of the ‘contested space’ (Hunter and Perkins, 2014) surrounding both public health practice and licensing partnerships. In some instances, contested spaces were successfully negotiated and public health departments achieved an increased level of participation within the partnership. Ultimately, improvements in engagement levels of public health teams within licensing could be achieved. \n \nThe paper explores a neglected aspect of research around partnership working and highlights the issues arising when a new partner attempts to enter an existing partnership.","PeriodicalId":44780,"journal":{"name":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/dat-05-2020-0025","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public health participation in alcohol licensing decisions in England: the importance of navigating “contested space”\",\"authors\":\"Linda Somerville, B. Thom, R. Herring\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dat-05-2020-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act of 2011, added ‘health bodies’ as responsible authorities in licensing and, in practice, Directors of Public Health undertook this role. Despite this legislation facilitating the inclusion of public health in partnerships around licensing in England, wide variations in involvement levels by Public Health professionals persist This article is based on the findings from interviews that explored the experiences of public health professionals engaging with local established partnerships around alcohol licensing. Qualitative data were collected through twenty-one interviews in a purposeful sample of London boroughs. These data were combined with analyses of relevant area documentation and observations of fourteen licensing sub-committee meetings in one London borough over a seven-month period. Thematic analysis of all data sources was conducted to identify emerging themes. \\n \\nThis study highlighted the importance of successful navigation of the ‘contested space’ (Hunter and Perkins, 2014) surrounding both public health practice and licensing partnerships. In some instances, contested spaces were successfully negotiated and public health departments achieved an increased level of participation within the partnership. Ultimately, improvements in engagement levels of public health teams within licensing could be achieved. \\n \\nThe paper explores a neglected aspect of research around partnership working and highlights the issues arising when a new partner attempts to enter an existing partnership.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs and Alcohol Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/dat-05-2020-0025\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs and Alcohol Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dat-05-2020-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dat-05-2020-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2011年的《警察改革和社会责任法》增加了“卫生机构”作为发放许可证的负责机构,在实践中,公共卫生总监承担了这一职责。尽管这项立法有助于将公共卫生纳入英格兰的许可证合作伙伴关系,但公共卫生专业人员的参与程度仍然存在很大差异。本文基于采访的结果,这些采访探讨了公共卫生专业人士参与当地建立的酒精许可证合作的经验。定性数据是通过对伦敦各行政区的21次访谈收集的。这些数据与相关地区文件的分析以及在七个月内在伦敦一个行政区举行的十四次许可证小组委员会会议的观察结果相结合。对所有数据来源进行了专题分析,以确定新出现的专题。这项研究强调了围绕公共卫生实践和许可合作伙伴关系成功导航“有争议的空间”(Hunter和Perkins,2014)的重要性。在某些情况下,有争议的空间谈判成功,公共卫生部门在伙伴关系中的参与程度有所提高。最终,可以在许可范围内提高公共卫生团队的参与水平。本文探讨了围绕伙伴关系工作的研究中被忽视的一个方面,并强调了新伙伴试图加入现有伙伴关系时出现的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public health participation in alcohol licensing decisions in England: the importance of navigating “contested space”
The Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act of 2011, added ‘health bodies’ as responsible authorities in licensing and, in practice, Directors of Public Health undertook this role. Despite this legislation facilitating the inclusion of public health in partnerships around licensing in England, wide variations in involvement levels by Public Health professionals persist This article is based on the findings from interviews that explored the experiences of public health professionals engaging with local established partnerships around alcohol licensing. Qualitative data were collected through twenty-one interviews in a purposeful sample of London boroughs. These data were combined with analyses of relevant area documentation and observations of fourteen licensing sub-committee meetings in one London borough over a seven-month period. Thematic analysis of all data sources was conducted to identify emerging themes. This study highlighted the importance of successful navigation of the ‘contested space’ (Hunter and Perkins, 2014) surrounding both public health practice and licensing partnerships. In some instances, contested spaces were successfully negotiated and public health departments achieved an increased level of participation within the partnership. Ultimately, improvements in engagement levels of public health teams within licensing could be achieved. The paper explores a neglected aspect of research around partnership working and highlights the issues arising when a new partner attempts to enter an existing partnership.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs and Alcohol Today
Drugs and Alcohol Today SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The misuse of drugs act – a user perspective More harm than good? Cannabis, harm and the misuse of drugs act Risk perception, health stressors and reduction in sharing cannabis products during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study From law to regulation: re-appraising the misuse of Drugs Act 1971 Fifty years of the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971: the legislative contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1