老化方法对牙本质腔内黏合剂体系推出强度的影响

IF 1.68 Q2 Dentistry Applied Adhesion Science Pub Date : 2017-01-03 DOI:10.1186/s40563-016-0079-z
Letícia Virgínia de Freitas Chaves, Tuany Arantxa de Medeiros, Boniek Castillo Dutra Borges, Maria do Carmo Aguiar Jordão Mainardi, Anderson Catelan, Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar
{"title":"老化方法对牙本质腔内黏合剂体系推出强度的影响","authors":"Letícia Virgínia de Freitas Chaves,&nbsp;Tuany Arantxa de Medeiros,&nbsp;Boniek Castillo Dutra Borges,&nbsp;Maria do Carmo Aguiar Jordão Mainardi,&nbsp;Anderson Catelan,&nbsp;Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar","doi":"10.1186/s40563-016-0079-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluated the effect of aging methods on the bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems to dentin cavities. Eighty bovine incisors were used to prepare dentin cavities, which were bonded with different adhesive systems [Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose (SBMP), and Adper Single Bond 2 (SB)], and restored with composite resin. The specimens were stored in water for 24?h, and subjected to each aging method (n?=?10): control group (not exposed to additional aging), thermal cycling (TC) (10,000 cycles; at temperatures of 5, 37, and 55?°C), mechanical loading (ML) (100,000 cycles; Hz; 60?N load), and TC?+?ML. The push-out bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α?=?0.05). For SBMP, only TC?+?ML decreased the bond strength compared to control group. For SB, all aging methods decreased similarly the bond strength compared to control group. A high number of adhesive failures were observed. Therefore, SB was sensitive to all aging methods, whilst only TC?+?ML was able to decrease the bond strength for SBMP.</p>","PeriodicalId":464,"journal":{"name":"Applied Adhesion Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6800,"publicationDate":"2017-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-016-0079-z","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of aging methods on push-out bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin cavities\",\"authors\":\"Letícia Virgínia de Freitas Chaves,&nbsp;Tuany Arantxa de Medeiros,&nbsp;Boniek Castillo Dutra Borges,&nbsp;Maria do Carmo Aguiar Jordão Mainardi,&nbsp;Anderson Catelan,&nbsp;Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40563-016-0079-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study evaluated the effect of aging methods on the bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems to dentin cavities. Eighty bovine incisors were used to prepare dentin cavities, which were bonded with different adhesive systems [Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose (SBMP), and Adper Single Bond 2 (SB)], and restored with composite resin. The specimens were stored in water for 24?h, and subjected to each aging method (n?=?10): control group (not exposed to additional aging), thermal cycling (TC) (10,000 cycles; at temperatures of 5, 37, and 55?°C), mechanical loading (ML) (100,000 cycles; Hz; 60?N load), and TC?+?ML. The push-out bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α?=?0.05). For SBMP, only TC?+?ML decreased the bond strength compared to control group. For SB, all aging methods decreased similarly the bond strength compared to control group. A high number of adhesive failures were observed. Therefore, SB was sensitive to all aging methods, whilst only TC?+?ML was able to decrease the bond strength for SBMP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6800,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-016-0079-z\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-016-0079-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Adhesion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-016-0079-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究评估了老化方法对蚀刻-冲洗胶粘剂系统与牙本质腔的结合强度的影响。用80只牛切牙制备牙本质空腔,分别用不同的粘接体系[Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose (SBMP), and Adper Single Bond 2 (SB)]进行粘接,并用复合树脂进行修复。标本在水中保存24?h,并接受每种老化方法(n?=?10):对照组(不暴露于额外老化),热循环(TC)(10,000次循环;在5、37和55°C的温度下),机械加载(ML)(100,000循环;赫兹;60吗?N负载),TC + ML。推出粘结强度试验采用万能试验机进行。通过扫描电镜对失效模式进行了评估。数据采用双因素方差分析和Tukey检验(α?=?0.05)。对于SBMP,只有TC?+?与对照组相比,ML降低了粘接强度。对于SB,与对照组相比,所有老化方法的结合强度下降相似。观察到大量的粘合剂失效。因此,SB对所有老化方法都敏感,而TC?+?ML能够降低SBMP的结合强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of aging methods on push-out bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin cavities

This study evaluated the effect of aging methods on the bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems to dentin cavities. Eighty bovine incisors were used to prepare dentin cavities, which were bonded with different adhesive systems [Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose (SBMP), and Adper Single Bond 2 (SB)], and restored with composite resin. The specimens were stored in water for 24?h, and subjected to each aging method (n?=?10): control group (not exposed to additional aging), thermal cycling (TC) (10,000 cycles; at temperatures of 5, 37, and 55?°C), mechanical loading (ML) (100,000 cycles; Hz; 60?N load), and TC?+?ML. The push-out bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α?=?0.05). For SBMP, only TC?+?ML decreased the bond strength compared to control group. For SB, all aging methods decreased similarly the bond strength compared to control group. A high number of adhesive failures were observed. Therefore, SB was sensitive to all aging methods, whilst only TC?+?ML was able to decrease the bond strength for SBMP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Adhesion Science
Applied Adhesion Science Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Adhesion Science focuses on practical applications of adhesives, with special emphasis in fields such as oil industry, aerospace and biomedicine. Topics related to the phenomena of adhesion and the application of adhesive materials are welcome, especially in biomedical areas such as adhesive dentistry. Both theoretical and experimental works are considered for publication. Applied Adhesion Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal''s open access policy offers a fast publication workflow whilst maintaining rigorous peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Effect of interface-active proteins on the salt crystal size in waterborne hybrid materials Mechanical properties of unmodified and montmorillonite-modified epoxy compounds. Part I: compression test Influence of biobased polyol type on the properties of polyurethane hotmelt adhesives for footwear joints In vitro antibacterial effect of fifth generation dentin bonding agent incorporated with nisin on Streptococcus mutans Antioxidant pre-treatments are able to reduce waiting time for restorative treatment after dental bleaching: a microtensile bond strength exploratory study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1