口腔扁平苔藓的治疗:系统综述

Sm Anwar Sadat, R. Akter, Sharmin Ferdaus Emu
{"title":"口腔扁平苔藓的治疗:系统综述","authors":"Sm Anwar Sadat, R. Akter, Sharmin Ferdaus Emu","doi":"10.3329/jbcps.v41i3.66937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Oral Lichen Planus (OLP) treatment or clinical management is challenging. This systematic review aims to discuss the main therapy used in the management of OLP and the efficacy of every type of treatment to improve the quality of patient life.\nMethodology: We discussed the publications on the clinical management of oral lichen planus on the PubMed database. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) conducted in humans were considered. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) published from 2005/1/1 to 2021/5/28 with symptomatic, clinically, or histologically diagnosed OLP. We compared different active treatments or between active treatment and placebo.\nResults: Twenty randomized controlled trials involving 931 patient samples were included in the analysis. For the short time treatment (on average 2-8 weeks) of OLP, TCI, including Tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, and Ciclosporin, were similar to TCS, including Clobetasol, triamcinolone in efficacy. Tacrolimus–Triamcinolone resulted in similar outcomes. In addition, Tacrolimus and Ciclosporin showed a statistically higher incidence of local adverse events than triamcinolone and Clobetasol. A few systemic adverse events occurred in the tacrolimus and ciclosporin groups, but they were not serious.\nConclusion: Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% should be the first drug of choice when selecting TCS, and Tacrolimus 0.1% should be the drug of choice when selecting TCI.\nJ Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2023; 41: 219-233","PeriodicalId":89579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians & Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Sm Anwar Sadat, R. Akter, Sharmin Ferdaus Emu\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jbcps.v41i3.66937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Oral Lichen Planus (OLP) treatment or clinical management is challenging. This systematic review aims to discuss the main therapy used in the management of OLP and the efficacy of every type of treatment to improve the quality of patient life.\\nMethodology: We discussed the publications on the clinical management of oral lichen planus on the PubMed database. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) conducted in humans were considered. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) published from 2005/1/1 to 2021/5/28 with symptomatic, clinically, or histologically diagnosed OLP. We compared different active treatments or between active treatment and placebo.\\nResults: Twenty randomized controlled trials involving 931 patient samples were included in the analysis. For the short time treatment (on average 2-8 weeks) of OLP, TCI, including Tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, and Ciclosporin, were similar to TCS, including Clobetasol, triamcinolone in efficacy. Tacrolimus–Triamcinolone resulted in similar outcomes. In addition, Tacrolimus and Ciclosporin showed a statistically higher incidence of local adverse events than triamcinolone and Clobetasol. A few systemic adverse events occurred in the tacrolimus and ciclosporin groups, but they were not serious.\\nConclusion: Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% should be the first drug of choice when selecting TCS, and Tacrolimus 0.1% should be the drug of choice when selecting TCI.\\nJ Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2023; 41: 219-233\",\"PeriodicalId\":89579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians & Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians & Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcps.v41i3.66937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians & Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcps.v41i3.66937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)的治疗或临床管理具有挑战性。本系统综述旨在讨论用于OLP管理的主要治疗方法以及每种治疗方法对改善患者生活质量的疗效。方法:我们讨论了PubMed数据库中有关口腔扁平苔藓临床管理的出版物。只考虑了在人类中进行的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们纳入了2005年1月1日至2021年5月28日发表的有症状、临床或组织学诊断的OLP的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们比较了不同的积极治疗或积极治疗和安慰剂之间的差异。结果:纳入20项随机对照试验931例患者样本。短期治疗(平均2-8周),TCI(包括他克莫司、吡美莫司、环孢素)的疗效与TCI(包括氯倍他索、曲安奈德)相似。他克莫司-曲安奈德也有类似的结果。此外,他克莫司和环孢素局部不良事件发生率明显高于曲安奈德和氯倍他索。他克莫司组和环孢素组发生了一些全身不良事件,但不严重。结论:0.1%曲安奈德应作为TCS的首选药物,0.1%他克莫司应作为TCI的首选药物。[J]孟加拉大学物理外科20123;41: 219 - 233
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review
Objective: Oral Lichen Planus (OLP) treatment or clinical management is challenging. This systematic review aims to discuss the main therapy used in the management of OLP and the efficacy of every type of treatment to improve the quality of patient life. Methodology: We discussed the publications on the clinical management of oral lichen planus on the PubMed database. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) conducted in humans were considered. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) published from 2005/1/1 to 2021/5/28 with symptomatic, clinically, or histologically diagnosed OLP. We compared different active treatments or between active treatment and placebo. Results: Twenty randomized controlled trials involving 931 patient samples were included in the analysis. For the short time treatment (on average 2-8 weeks) of OLP, TCI, including Tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, and Ciclosporin, were similar to TCS, including Clobetasol, triamcinolone in efficacy. Tacrolimus–Triamcinolone resulted in similar outcomes. In addition, Tacrolimus and Ciclosporin showed a statistically higher incidence of local adverse events than triamcinolone and Clobetasol. A few systemic adverse events occurred in the tacrolimus and ciclosporin groups, but they were not serious. Conclusion: Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% should be the first drug of choice when selecting TCS, and Tacrolimus 0.1% should be the drug of choice when selecting TCI. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2023; 41: 219-233
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinicodemographic Characteristics of COVID-19 Infection Among Patients with Rheumatic Diseases Primary Myelofibrosis in a Young Girl- A Case Report Gastric Xanthoma – A Case Report An Observational Study on Levels of Serum Fibrin Degradation Product (FDP), D-Dimer and Procalcitonin in Burn Sepsis Tolosa Hunt Syndrome- A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1