{"title":"非法行为:英国的家庭与耻辱,1660–1834","authors":"S. Fox","doi":"10.1080/09612025.2023.2240525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"as her interviewees’. The power of these conversations, or ‘critical dialogues’ as Littler puts it, is rooted in this orality. One drawback, however, is Littler’s neglect to include any in-depth explanation of oral history method and theory. More insight may have also been achieved through a life story method or placing the interviews in dialogue with her own critical analysis, perhaps providing more background on some of the lesser-known interviewees. However, this would go beyond the scope of the book and what the interviews were intended for: as an accessible resource for readers to ‘read, reflect and draw their own conclusions’. Left Feminisms is an ideal starting point for any reader looking to explore different strands of socialist-feminist theory and practice, past and present, as well as the lived experience of these. It is by no means a comprehensive study of left feminisms, which Littler admits, but it succeeds as a resource for encouraging readers to think through the ‘developments and difficulties, promise and potential of feminism and left politics’. Although slightly geared towards the already converted, the text’s engaging and accessible format will ensure it is used as a springboard for further research and activism by a wide readership.","PeriodicalId":46582,"journal":{"name":"WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW","volume":"32 1","pages":"922 - 923"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illegitimacy: family & stigma in England, 1660–1834\",\"authors\":\"S. Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09612025.2023.2240525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"as her interviewees’. The power of these conversations, or ‘critical dialogues’ as Littler puts it, is rooted in this orality. One drawback, however, is Littler’s neglect to include any in-depth explanation of oral history method and theory. More insight may have also been achieved through a life story method or placing the interviews in dialogue with her own critical analysis, perhaps providing more background on some of the lesser-known interviewees. However, this would go beyond the scope of the book and what the interviews were intended for: as an accessible resource for readers to ‘read, reflect and draw their own conclusions’. Left Feminisms is an ideal starting point for any reader looking to explore different strands of socialist-feminist theory and practice, past and present, as well as the lived experience of these. It is by no means a comprehensive study of left feminisms, which Littler admits, but it succeeds as a resource for encouraging readers to think through the ‘developments and difficulties, promise and potential of feminism and left politics’. Although slightly geared towards the already converted, the text’s engaging and accessible format will ensure it is used as a springboard for further research and activism by a wide readership.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"922 - 923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2023.2240525\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2023.2240525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Illegitimacy: family & stigma in England, 1660–1834
as her interviewees’. The power of these conversations, or ‘critical dialogues’ as Littler puts it, is rooted in this orality. One drawback, however, is Littler’s neglect to include any in-depth explanation of oral history method and theory. More insight may have also been achieved through a life story method or placing the interviews in dialogue with her own critical analysis, perhaps providing more background on some of the lesser-known interviewees. However, this would go beyond the scope of the book and what the interviews were intended for: as an accessible resource for readers to ‘read, reflect and draw their own conclusions’. Left Feminisms is an ideal starting point for any reader looking to explore different strands of socialist-feminist theory and practice, past and present, as well as the lived experience of these. It is by no means a comprehensive study of left feminisms, which Littler admits, but it succeeds as a resource for encouraging readers to think through the ‘developments and difficulties, promise and potential of feminism and left politics’. Although slightly geared towards the already converted, the text’s engaging and accessible format will ensure it is used as a springboard for further research and activism by a wide readership.
期刊介绍:
Women"s History Review is a major international journal whose aim is to provide a forum for the publication of new scholarly articles in the field of womens" history. The time span covered by the journal includes the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries as well as earlier times. The journal seeks to publish contributions from a range of disciplines (for example, women"s studies, history, sociology, cultural studies, literature, political science, anthropology, philosophy and media studies) that further feminist knowledge and debate about women and/or gender relations in history. The Editors welcome a variety of approaches from people from different countries and backgrounds.