非法行为:英国的家庭与耻辱,1660–1834

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1080/09612025.2023.2240525
S. Fox
{"title":"非法行为:英国的家庭与耻辱,1660–1834","authors":"S. Fox","doi":"10.1080/09612025.2023.2240525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"as her interviewees’. The power of these conversations, or ‘critical dialogues’ as Littler puts it, is rooted in this orality. One drawback, however, is Littler’s neglect to include any in-depth explanation of oral history method and theory. More insight may have also been achieved through a life story method or placing the interviews in dialogue with her own critical analysis, perhaps providing more background on some of the lesser-known interviewees. However, this would go beyond the scope of the book and what the interviews were intended for: as an accessible resource for readers to ‘read, reflect and draw their own conclusions’. Left Feminisms is an ideal starting point for any reader looking to explore different strands of socialist-feminist theory and practice, past and present, as well as the lived experience of these. It is by no means a comprehensive study of left feminisms, which Littler admits, but it succeeds as a resource for encouraging readers to think through the ‘developments and difficulties, promise and potential of feminism and left politics’. Although slightly geared towards the already converted, the text’s engaging and accessible format will ensure it is used as a springboard for further research and activism by a wide readership.","PeriodicalId":46582,"journal":{"name":"WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW","volume":"32 1","pages":"922 - 923"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illegitimacy: family & stigma in England, 1660–1834\",\"authors\":\"S. Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09612025.2023.2240525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"as her interviewees’. The power of these conversations, or ‘critical dialogues’ as Littler puts it, is rooted in this orality. One drawback, however, is Littler’s neglect to include any in-depth explanation of oral history method and theory. More insight may have also been achieved through a life story method or placing the interviews in dialogue with her own critical analysis, perhaps providing more background on some of the lesser-known interviewees. However, this would go beyond the scope of the book and what the interviews were intended for: as an accessible resource for readers to ‘read, reflect and draw their own conclusions’. Left Feminisms is an ideal starting point for any reader looking to explore different strands of socialist-feminist theory and practice, past and present, as well as the lived experience of these. It is by no means a comprehensive study of left feminisms, which Littler admits, but it succeeds as a resource for encouraging readers to think through the ‘developments and difficulties, promise and potential of feminism and left politics’. Although slightly geared towards the already converted, the text’s engaging and accessible format will ensure it is used as a springboard for further research and activism by a wide readership.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"922 - 923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2023.2240525\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2023.2240525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为她的受访者。这些对话的力量,或利特勒所说的“批判性对话”,根植于这种口语化。然而,一个缺点是利特勒忽略了对口述历史方法和理论的任何深入解释。通过生活故事的方法或将访谈与她自己的批判性分析进行对话,也许可以为一些不太知名的受访者提供更多的背景信息,也可以获得更多的见解。然而,这超出了这本书的范围,也超出了采访的本意:作为读者“阅读、反思和得出自己结论”的可访问资源。左派女权主义是一个理想的起点,任何读者希望探索不同的社会主义女权主义理论和实践,过去和现在,以及他们的生活经验。利特勒承认,这本书绝不是对左翼女权主义的全面研究,但它成功地作为一种资源,鼓励读者思考“女权主义和左翼政治的发展和困难,希望和潜力”。虽然稍微面向已经转换,文本的引人入胜和易于访问的格式将确保它被广泛的读者用作进一步研究和行动主义的跳板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Illegitimacy: family & stigma in England, 1660–1834
as her interviewees’. The power of these conversations, or ‘critical dialogues’ as Littler puts it, is rooted in this orality. One drawback, however, is Littler’s neglect to include any in-depth explanation of oral history method and theory. More insight may have also been achieved through a life story method or placing the interviews in dialogue with her own critical analysis, perhaps providing more background on some of the lesser-known interviewees. However, this would go beyond the scope of the book and what the interviews were intended for: as an accessible resource for readers to ‘read, reflect and draw their own conclusions’. Left Feminisms is an ideal starting point for any reader looking to explore different strands of socialist-feminist theory and practice, past and present, as well as the lived experience of these. It is by no means a comprehensive study of left feminisms, which Littler admits, but it succeeds as a resource for encouraging readers to think through the ‘developments and difficulties, promise and potential of feminism and left politics’. Although slightly geared towards the already converted, the text’s engaging and accessible format will ensure it is used as a springboard for further research and activism by a wide readership.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Women"s History Review is a major international journal whose aim is to provide a forum for the publication of new scholarly articles in the field of womens" history. The time span covered by the journal includes the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries as well as earlier times. The journal seeks to publish contributions from a range of disciplines (for example, women"s studies, history, sociology, cultural studies, literature, political science, anthropology, philosophy and media studies) that further feminist knowledge and debate about women and/or gender relations in history. The Editors welcome a variety of approaches from people from different countries and backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
Gender in urban development of post-war Europe. Women’s social position in the planning strategies of Basildon (UK) and Pernik (Bulgaria) in the long 1950s Congratulations to Rachel Reeves who, in 2024, becomes the first woman to be Chancellor of the Exchequer in the UK Two lost women and an unlikely French connection The great Miss Lydia Becker Dale Spender (1943–2023): some personal reflections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1