基于数字钻井的岩石各向异性及各向异性对刀具磨损的影响

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1144/qjegh2022-103
Haoteng Wang, Mingming He, Jian-bin Zhao, Yonghao Zhang
{"title":"基于数字钻井的岩石各向异性及各向异性对刀具磨损的影响","authors":"Haoteng Wang, Mingming He, Jian-bin Zhao, Yonghao Zhang","doi":"10.1144/qjegh2022-103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Anisotropy affects the mechanical behaviours of rock, especially for application in rock engineering. In this study, a digital drilling method is proposed to evaluate the mechanical anisotropy of rock. In consideration with the critical friction, the cutting efficiency and contact stress are determined from the revised drilling model to characterize the drilling process. For six types of rock, a series of drilling tests are conducted on three axial directions using the coring bit. The anisotropy of rock strength is obtained from the point load test to compare with the anisotropy of drilling characteristics. Correspondingly, an anisotropy criterion is established. A critical point is identified in the evolution of contact stress and the plot of drilling parameters, corresponding to the critical friction. Result indicates that the evolution of contact stress with inclination angle suggests the similar elastic and plastic stages (inclination angles of 5 and 12, respectively). The typical evolution is also confirmed by the critical depth of the friction point. Moreover, the cutting efficiency and contact stress at the critical point show the evident anisotropic characteristic. A comparison of\n A\n 1\n and\n A\n 2\n is conducted to determine the anisotropy index of drilling characteristics. Contact stress present the anisotropy sequence as shale (22.45) > gneiss (14.21) > schist 302 (10.74) and blue sandstone (10.07) > granite (7.29) > red sandstone (5.09). The consistency examination with strength anisotropy index suggests that the contact stress has a fitting correlation with an accuracy of 91 %. In summary, the digital drilling-based method provides a reliable evaluation for rock anisotropy, showing potential in practical application.\n","PeriodicalId":20937,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital drilling-based determination of rock anisotropy and anisotropic effect on cutter wear\",\"authors\":\"Haoteng Wang, Mingming He, Jian-bin Zhao, Yonghao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/qjegh2022-103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Anisotropy affects the mechanical behaviours of rock, especially for application in rock engineering. In this study, a digital drilling method is proposed to evaluate the mechanical anisotropy of rock. In consideration with the critical friction, the cutting efficiency and contact stress are determined from the revised drilling model to characterize the drilling process. For six types of rock, a series of drilling tests are conducted on three axial directions using the coring bit. The anisotropy of rock strength is obtained from the point load test to compare with the anisotropy of drilling characteristics. Correspondingly, an anisotropy criterion is established. A critical point is identified in the evolution of contact stress and the plot of drilling parameters, corresponding to the critical friction. Result indicates that the evolution of contact stress with inclination angle suggests the similar elastic and plastic stages (inclination angles of 5 and 12, respectively). The typical evolution is also confirmed by the critical depth of the friction point. Moreover, the cutting efficiency and contact stress at the critical point show the evident anisotropic characteristic. A comparison of\\n A\\n 1\\n and\\n A\\n 2\\n is conducted to determine the anisotropy index of drilling characteristics. Contact stress present the anisotropy sequence as shale (22.45) > gneiss (14.21) > schist 302 (10.74) and blue sandstone (10.07) > granite (7.29) > red sandstone (5.09). The consistency examination with strength anisotropy index suggests that the contact stress has a fitting correlation with an accuracy of 91 %. In summary, the digital drilling-based method provides a reliable evaluation for rock anisotropy, showing potential in practical application.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":20937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2022-103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2022-103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

各向异性影响着岩石的力学行为,特别是在岩石工程中的应用。本文提出了一种评价岩石力学各向异性的数字钻井方法。在考虑临界摩擦的情况下,根据修正的钻孔模型确定了切削效率和接触应力,以表征钻孔过程。针对6种岩石,采用取心钻头在3个轴向上进行了一系列钻孔试验。通过点荷载试验得到岩石强度的各向异性,并与钻孔特性的各向异性进行比较。相应的,建立了各向异性判据。在接触应力演化和钻削参数图中确定了一个临界点,该临界点对应于临界摩擦。结果表明:接触应力随倾角的演化呈现出相似的弹性和塑性阶段(倾角分别为5和12);摩擦点的临界深度也证实了典型的演化。切削效率和临界点处的接触应力表现出明显的各向异性特征。将a1与a2进行对比,确定钻井特征各向异性指数。接触应力各向异性顺序为页岩(22.45)>片麻岩(14.21)>片岩302(10.74)和蓝砂岩(10.07)>花岗岩(7.29)>红砂岩(5.09)。与强度各向异性指标的一致性检验表明,接触应力的拟合相关精度为91%。综上所述,基于数字钻井的方法为岩石各向异性提供了可靠的评价,具有实际应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital drilling-based determination of rock anisotropy and anisotropic effect on cutter wear
Anisotropy affects the mechanical behaviours of rock, especially for application in rock engineering. In this study, a digital drilling method is proposed to evaluate the mechanical anisotropy of rock. In consideration with the critical friction, the cutting efficiency and contact stress are determined from the revised drilling model to characterize the drilling process. For six types of rock, a series of drilling tests are conducted on three axial directions using the coring bit. The anisotropy of rock strength is obtained from the point load test to compare with the anisotropy of drilling characteristics. Correspondingly, an anisotropy criterion is established. A critical point is identified in the evolution of contact stress and the plot of drilling parameters, corresponding to the critical friction. Result indicates that the evolution of contact stress with inclination angle suggests the similar elastic and plastic stages (inclination angles of 5 and 12, respectively). The typical evolution is also confirmed by the critical depth of the friction point. Moreover, the cutting efficiency and contact stress at the critical point show the evident anisotropic characteristic. A comparison of A 1 and A 2 is conducted to determine the anisotropy index of drilling characteristics. Contact stress present the anisotropy sequence as shale (22.45) > gneiss (14.21) > schist 302 (10.74) and blue sandstone (10.07) > granite (7.29) > red sandstone (5.09). The consistency examination with strength anisotropy index suggests that the contact stress has a fitting correlation with an accuracy of 91 %. In summary, the digital drilling-based method provides a reliable evaluation for rock anisotropy, showing potential in practical application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology is owned by the Geological Society of London and published by the Geological Society Publishing House. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology (QJEGH) is an established peer reviewed international journal featuring papers on geology as applied to civil engineering mining practice and water resources. Papers are invited from, and about, all areas of the world on engineering geology and hydrogeology topics. This includes but is not limited to: applied geophysics, engineering geomorphology, environmental geology, hydrogeology, groundwater quality, ground source heat, contaminated land, waste management, land use planning, geotechnics, rock mechanics, geomaterials and geological hazards. The journal publishes the prestigious Glossop and Ineson lectures, research papers, case studies, review articles, technical notes, photographic features, thematic sets, discussion papers, editorial opinion and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Degradation and protection of cut slopes in weathered gneiss; a 40-year case study Development of a drought-resilient water supply from dolomitized limestones of the Irish Midlands Understanding the Behavior of Seismically Derived Poisson's Ratio in Near Surface Characterization Jet grouting to new depths in the Lambeth Group and Thanet Formation beneath London Size Effect of Anisotropy in Rocks Spatial Variability: Evaluating through Digital Drilling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1