在人权课程中“消极权利”和“积极权利”之间的对比

Mirza Satria Buana
{"title":"在人权课程中“消极权利”和“积极权利”之间的对比","authors":"Mirza Satria Buana","doi":"10.25123/vej.v9i1.6042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the conceptual dichotomy between ‘negative right’ and ‘positive right’ in the current discourse of human rights. The dichotomy has been embedded due to the historical description of generations of human rights, encompassing the civil and political rights that have liberalism influences, to the economic, social, and cultural rights that have socialist influences, and the last generation of rights being the collective and solidarity rights. This paper analyses the dichotomy from the standpoint of the right to development, with some pivotal approaches, including conceptual, case law, and comparative constitutional law approaches. It concludes that the dichotomy can only be used in a teaching and pedagogical setting of human rights, but the dichotomy cannot sustain the test in theoretical-conceptual and practical analyses.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KELINDAN ANTARA ‘HAK NEGATIF’ DENGAN ‘HAK POSITIF’ DALAM DISKURSUS HAK ASASI MANUSIA\",\"authors\":\"Mirza Satria Buana\",\"doi\":\"10.25123/vej.v9i1.6042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the conceptual dichotomy between ‘negative right’ and ‘positive right’ in the current discourse of human rights. The dichotomy has been embedded due to the historical description of generations of human rights, encompassing the civil and political rights that have liberalism influences, to the economic, social, and cultural rights that have socialist influences, and the last generation of rights being the collective and solidarity rights. This paper analyses the dichotomy from the standpoint of the right to development, with some pivotal approaches, including conceptual, case law, and comparative constitutional law approaches. It concludes that the dichotomy can only be used in a teaching and pedagogical setting of human rights, but the dichotomy cannot sustain the test in theoretical-conceptual and practical analyses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veritas et Justitia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veritas et Justitia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v9i1.6042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veritas et Justitia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v9i1.6042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了当前人权话语中“消极权利”和“积极权利”的概念二分法。由于对几代人权的历史描述,这种二分法已经根深蒂固,包括受自由主义影响的公民权利和政治权利,以及受社会主义影响的经济、社会和文化权利,最后一代权利是集体权利和团结权利。本文从发展权的角度分析了这种二分法,采用了一些关键的方法,包括概念法、判例法和比较宪法法。它得出的结论是,这种二分法只能在人权的教学和教学环境中使用,但在理论、概念和实践分析中,这种二分法无法经受住考验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KELINDAN ANTARA ‘HAK NEGATIF’ DENGAN ‘HAK POSITIF’ DALAM DISKURSUS HAK ASASI MANUSIA
This paper examines the conceptual dichotomy between ‘negative right’ and ‘positive right’ in the current discourse of human rights. The dichotomy has been embedded due to the historical description of generations of human rights, encompassing the civil and political rights that have liberalism influences, to the economic, social, and cultural rights that have socialist influences, and the last generation of rights being the collective and solidarity rights. This paper analyses the dichotomy from the standpoint of the right to development, with some pivotal approaches, including conceptual, case law, and comparative constitutional law approaches. It concludes that the dichotomy can only be used in a teaching and pedagogical setting of human rights, but the dichotomy cannot sustain the test in theoretical-conceptual and practical analyses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
FORMULASI PIDANA PENUTUPAN KORPORASI ATAS DELIK LINGKUNGAN HIDUP KEDARURATAN KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT DAN PEMBATASAN HAM DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA PARADIGMA POLITIK HUKUM PENGUPAHAN INDONESIA: STUDI HAK ATAS UPAH LAYAK BAGI BURUH INFORMAL KELINDAN ANTARA ‘HAK NEGATIF’ DENGAN ‘HAK POSITIF’ DALAM DISKURSUS HAK ASASI MANUSIA PERAN FAKULTAS HUKUM DALAM PENYIAPAN KESIAPSIAGAAN NASIONAL MENANGGULANGI TERORISME DI ERA REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4.0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1