评估重症监护人员认为最佳肠内营养做法的障碍

IF 3.4 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1186/s43094-023-00507-y
Eman Mohamed Elmokadem, Maha Gamil Hanna, Ebtissam Abdelghaffar Darweesh, Ahmed Mohamed Bassiouny, Nagwa A. Sabri, Radwa Maher El Borolossy
{"title":"评估重症监护人员认为最佳肠内营养做法的障碍","authors":"Eman Mohamed Elmokadem,&nbsp;Maha Gamil Hanna,&nbsp;Ebtissam Abdelghaffar Darweesh,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohamed Bassiouny,&nbsp;Nagwa A. Sabri,&nbsp;Radwa Maher El Borolossy","doi":"10.1186/s43094-023-00507-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nutritional support is a vital intervention for critically ill patients. Despite the existence of several clinical practice guidelines focused on enteral nutrition of critically ill, there is still a gap between guideline recommendations and actual nutrition practices. The purpose of this study is to understand the role of the clinical pharmacist in identifying the barriers to applying optimum enteral nutritional practices from the perspective of critical care providers. A descriptive cross-sectional design was utilized using self-administered questionnaire. A total of 90 critical care providers comprising of 3 categories: physicians (n = 30), clinical pharmacists (n = 30), and nurses (n = 30) were recruited. \"The barriers to enteral feeding critically ill patients\" questionnaire was used to explore the barriers that hinder them from optimal delivery of enteral nutrition.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Not enough dietitian coverage during holidays was the most important barrier facing the physicians. As for the clinical pharmacists, the most important barrier was waiting for the dietitian to assess the patient. Regarding the nurses, familiarity with nutrition guidelines was the most important barrier. There was a highly significant difference between physicians, clinical pharmacists, and nurses regarding subscales’ scores and overall scores of Barriers Questionnaire except for the resources and provider attitudes.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Barriers to optimum enteral nutrition practices were explored with more attention on barriers regarding dietitian support and critical care providers' attitudes. This article provides the basis for the creation of interventions intended to overcome these barriers and enhance enteral nutrition practices.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":577,"journal":{"name":"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://fjps.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43094-023-00507-y","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of barriers to optimum enteral nutrition practices as perceived by critical care providers\",\"authors\":\"Eman Mohamed Elmokadem,&nbsp;Maha Gamil Hanna,&nbsp;Ebtissam Abdelghaffar Darweesh,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohamed Bassiouny,&nbsp;Nagwa A. Sabri,&nbsp;Radwa Maher El Borolossy\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43094-023-00507-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nutritional support is a vital intervention for critically ill patients. Despite the existence of several clinical practice guidelines focused on enteral nutrition of critically ill, there is still a gap between guideline recommendations and actual nutrition practices. The purpose of this study is to understand the role of the clinical pharmacist in identifying the barriers to applying optimum enteral nutritional practices from the perspective of critical care providers. A descriptive cross-sectional design was utilized using self-administered questionnaire. A total of 90 critical care providers comprising of 3 categories: physicians (n = 30), clinical pharmacists (n = 30), and nurses (n = 30) were recruited. \\\"The barriers to enteral feeding critically ill patients\\\" questionnaire was used to explore the barriers that hinder them from optimal delivery of enteral nutrition.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Not enough dietitian coverage during holidays was the most important barrier facing the physicians. As for the clinical pharmacists, the most important barrier was waiting for the dietitian to assess the patient. Regarding the nurses, familiarity with nutrition guidelines was the most important barrier. There was a highly significant difference between physicians, clinical pharmacists, and nurses regarding subscales’ scores and overall scores of Barriers Questionnaire except for the resources and provider attitudes.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Barriers to optimum enteral nutrition practices were explored with more attention on barriers regarding dietitian support and critical care providers' attitudes. This article provides the basis for the creation of interventions intended to overcome these barriers and enhance enteral nutrition practices.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://fjps.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43094-023-00507-y\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43094-023-00507-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43094-023-00507-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

营养支持是危重患者的重要干预措施。尽管有一些临床实践指南侧重于危重病人的肠内营养,但指南建议与实际营养实践之间仍存在差距。本研究的目的是了解临床药师在从重症监护提供者的角度确定应用最佳肠内营养实践的障碍方面的作用。采用自填问卷,采用描述性横断面设计。共招募90名重症监护提供者,包括3类:医生(n = 30)、临床药师(n = 30)和护士(n = 30)。采用“危重病人肠内营养障碍”问卷调查,探讨阻碍危重病人肠内营养最佳递送的障碍。结果假期营养师覆盖率不高是医生面临的最大障碍。对于临床药师来说,最重要的障碍是等待营养师对患者进行评估。对于护士而言,对营养指南的熟悉程度是最重要的障碍。医师、临床药师和护士在障碍问卷的分项得分和总分上存在极显著差异,但在资源和提供者态度上存在显著差异。结论探讨最佳肠内营养实践的障碍,重点关注营养学家支持和重症监护提供者态度方面的障碍。本文为制定旨在克服这些障碍和加强肠内营养实践的干预措施提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of barriers to optimum enteral nutrition practices as perceived by critical care providers

Background

Nutritional support is a vital intervention for critically ill patients. Despite the existence of several clinical practice guidelines focused on enteral nutrition of critically ill, there is still a gap between guideline recommendations and actual nutrition practices. The purpose of this study is to understand the role of the clinical pharmacist in identifying the barriers to applying optimum enteral nutritional practices from the perspective of critical care providers. A descriptive cross-sectional design was utilized using self-administered questionnaire. A total of 90 critical care providers comprising of 3 categories: physicians (n = 30), clinical pharmacists (n = 30), and nurses (n = 30) were recruited. "The barriers to enteral feeding critically ill patients" questionnaire was used to explore the barriers that hinder them from optimal delivery of enteral nutrition.

Results

Not enough dietitian coverage during holidays was the most important barrier facing the physicians. As for the clinical pharmacists, the most important barrier was waiting for the dietitian to assess the patient. Regarding the nurses, familiarity with nutrition guidelines was the most important barrier. There was a highly significant difference between physicians, clinical pharmacists, and nurses regarding subscales’ scores and overall scores of Barriers Questionnaire except for the resources and provider attitudes.

Conclusion

Barriers to optimum enteral nutrition practices were explored with more attention on barriers regarding dietitian support and critical care providers' attitudes. This article provides the basis for the creation of interventions intended to overcome these barriers and enhance enteral nutrition practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FJPS) is the official journal of the Future University in Egypt. It is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and case studies on all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences and technologies, pharmacy practice and related clinical aspects, and pharmacy education. The journal publishes articles covering developments in drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and dynamics, drug delivery systems, drug targeting and nano-technology. It also covers development of new systems, methods and techniques in pharmacy education and practice. The scope of the journal also extends to cover advancements in toxicology, cell and molecular biology, biomedical research, clinical and pharmaceutical microbiology, pharmaceutical biotechnology, medicinal chemistry, phytochemistry and nutraceuticals.
期刊最新文献
Lignin-chitosan-based biocomposite film for the localized delivery of TLR7 agonist imiquimod Development, characterization, and assessment of PLAROsomal vesicular system of curcumin for enhanced stability and therapeutic efficacy Biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Hylocereus undatus peel waste: exploring EGFR inhibition for targeted therapy of cervical and breast carcinomas Metabolic syndrome severity z-score in non-diabetic non-obese Egyptian patients with chronic hepatitis c virus infection Molecular modeling and implications of Biochanin A on ghrelin and IGF-1/myostatin signaling in radiation triggered cachexia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1