立法意图性质中的中心案例法

Q2 Social Sciences American Journal of Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2019-05-06 DOI:10.1093/AJJ/AUZ008
A. Dolcetti
{"title":"立法意图性质中的中心案例法","authors":"A. Dolcetti","doi":"10.1093/AJJ/AUZ008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In The Nature of Legislative Intent, Richard Ekins explores the nature of legislative intent and, in doing so, the nature of the legislature. More precisely, Ekins aims ‘to perceive and explain the shape of the well-formed legislature’; and seeks to identify the central case of the legislature – that is to say, ‘the form that the legislature has, if any, when it is chosen and maintained by practically reasonable persons’. To approach the nature of the legislature, Ekins employs the central case method. Although there are good reasons to employ this method (which I endorse), the book does not include a full explanation of the methodology that underpins its approach.","PeriodicalId":39920,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Jurisprudence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/AJJ/AUZ008","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Central Case Method in The Nature of Legislative Intent\",\"authors\":\"A. Dolcetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/AJJ/AUZ008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In The Nature of Legislative Intent, Richard Ekins explores the nature of legislative intent and, in doing so, the nature of the legislature. More precisely, Ekins aims ‘to perceive and explain the shape of the well-formed legislature’; and seeks to identify the central case of the legislature – that is to say, ‘the form that the legislature has, if any, when it is chosen and maintained by practically reasonable persons’. To approach the nature of the legislature, Ekins employs the central case method. Although there are good reasons to employ this method (which I endorse), the book does not include a full explanation of the methodology that underpins its approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Jurisprudence\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/AJJ/AUZ008\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Jurisprudence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/AJJ/AUZ008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/AJJ/AUZ008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在《立法意图的本质》一书中,Richard Ekins探讨了立法意图的性质,并在这样做的过程中探讨了立法机构的性质。更确切地说,埃金斯的目标是“感知和解释形成良好的立法机构的形状”;并试图确定立法机构的核心案例,也就是说,“当立法机构由实际合理的人选择和维护时,立法机构的形式(如果有的话)”。为了接近立法机构的性质,埃金斯采用了中心案例法。尽管有充分的理由采用这种方法(我对此表示赞同),但这本书并没有全面解释其方法的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Central Case Method in The Nature of Legislative Intent
In The Nature of Legislative Intent, Richard Ekins explores the nature of legislative intent and, in doing so, the nature of the legislature. More precisely, Ekins aims ‘to perceive and explain the shape of the well-formed legislature’; and seeks to identify the central case of the legislature – that is to say, ‘the form that the legislature has, if any, when it is chosen and maintained by practically reasonable persons’. To approach the nature of the legislature, Ekins employs the central case method. Although there are good reasons to employ this method (which I endorse), the book does not include a full explanation of the methodology that underpins its approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Jurisprudence
American Journal of Jurisprudence Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Practical Reason and Private Law: Some Sketches Specifying Interpersonal Responsibilities in Private Law: Property Perspectives Public-Private Drift and the Shattering Polity NDAs: A Study in Rights, Wrongs, and Civil Recourse Poverty and Private Law: Beyond Distributive Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1