体育迷问卷的Rasch校正与最优分类

IF 3 4区 教育学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship Pub Date : 2021-05-17 DOI:10.1108/IJSMS-11-2020-0208
Han Soo Kim, Minsoo Kang, Minjung Kim
{"title":"体育迷问卷的Rasch校正与最优分类","authors":"Han Soo Kim, Minsoo Kang, Minjung Kim","doi":"10.1108/IJSMS-11-2020-0208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the category function of the sport fandom questionnaire (SFQ), determine the optimal categorization of the SFQ and calibrate the measurement qualities of the newly modified rating scale option using Rasch analysis.Design/methodology/approachThis paper relies on the Rasch analysis to validate the SFQ. A series of studies are performed based on analysis procedures for the responses from 244 (study 1) and 477 (study 2) participants.FindingsThe results revealed that the original SFQ consisting of the eight-category rating scale is flagged due to irregular observation distribution and disordering of thresholds, whereas both six-category and seven-category rating scales meet the guidelines for the optimal categorization. However, only the seven-category rating scale showed desirable model-data fit indices. Furthermore, the results of the Rasch calibration model showed that all items of the SFQ have large variability, and a person's ability level varied moderately along the continuum.Originality/valueUnlike previous studies, examining the psychometric properties of the SFQ, the current study provides information about the optimal categorization and presents a novel reconstruction category in measuring individuals' sport fandom level. In measuring the level of sport fandom, the authors suggest the use of a seven-category rating scale that the current study found to exhibit reliability and construct validity.","PeriodicalId":47102,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rasch calibration and optimal categorization of the sport fandom questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Han Soo Kim, Minsoo Kang, Minjung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/IJSMS-11-2020-0208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the category function of the sport fandom questionnaire (SFQ), determine the optimal categorization of the SFQ and calibrate the measurement qualities of the newly modified rating scale option using Rasch analysis.Design/methodology/approachThis paper relies on the Rasch analysis to validate the SFQ. A series of studies are performed based on analysis procedures for the responses from 244 (study 1) and 477 (study 2) participants.FindingsThe results revealed that the original SFQ consisting of the eight-category rating scale is flagged due to irregular observation distribution and disordering of thresholds, whereas both six-category and seven-category rating scales meet the guidelines for the optimal categorization. However, only the seven-category rating scale showed desirable model-data fit indices. Furthermore, the results of the Rasch calibration model showed that all items of the SFQ have large variability, and a person's ability level varied moderately along the continuum.Originality/valueUnlike previous studies, examining the psychometric properties of the SFQ, the current study provides information about the optimal categorization and presents a novel reconstruction category in measuring individuals' sport fandom level. In measuring the level of sport fandom, the authors suggest the use of a seven-category rating scale that the current study found to exhibit reliability and construct validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-11-2020-0208\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-11-2020-0208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的本研究旨在评估体育迷问卷(SFQ)的分类功能,确定SFQ的最佳分类,并使用Rasch分析对新修改的评分量表选项的测量质量进行校准。设计/方法论/方法本文依靠Rasch分析来验证SFQ。根据244(研究1)和477(研究2)参与者的反应分析程序进行了一系列研究。结果表明,由八类评分量表组成的原始SFQ由于观察分布不规则和阈值无序而被标记,而六类和七类评分量都符合最佳分类准则。然而,只有七类评级量表显示出理想的模型数据拟合指数。此外,Rasch校准模型的结果表明,SFQ的所有项目都具有很大的可变性,并且一个人的能力水平沿着连续体适度变化。独创性/价值与之前的研究不同,目前的研究提供了关于最佳分类的信息,并提出了一个新的重建类别来衡量个人的运动粉丝水平。在衡量体育迷的水平时,作者建议使用七类评分量表,目前的研究发现该量表具有可靠性和结构有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rasch calibration and optimal categorization of the sport fandom questionnaire
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the category function of the sport fandom questionnaire (SFQ), determine the optimal categorization of the SFQ and calibrate the measurement qualities of the newly modified rating scale option using Rasch analysis.Design/methodology/approachThis paper relies on the Rasch analysis to validate the SFQ. A series of studies are performed based on analysis procedures for the responses from 244 (study 1) and 477 (study 2) participants.FindingsThe results revealed that the original SFQ consisting of the eight-category rating scale is flagged due to irregular observation distribution and disordering of thresholds, whereas both six-category and seven-category rating scales meet the guidelines for the optimal categorization. However, only the seven-category rating scale showed desirable model-data fit indices. Furthermore, the results of the Rasch calibration model showed that all items of the SFQ have large variability, and a person's ability level varied moderately along the continuum.Originality/valueUnlike previous studies, examining the psychometric properties of the SFQ, the current study provides information about the optimal categorization and presents a novel reconstruction category in measuring individuals' sport fandom level. In measuring the level of sport fandom, the authors suggest the use of a seven-category rating scale that the current study found to exhibit reliability and construct validity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship
International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship is the world’s leading journal for the sports marketing industry. Published quarterly, it has met the rigorous standards required for a listing by both PsycINFO and the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI).
期刊最新文献
Why do fans go to football games? A discrete choice analysis of ticket buyers' preferences The impact of brand attribution for an innovative sports product introduced on the fitness market in France Government-public relationships in the context of mega sport events: conceptualisation and scale development Consumer perceptions of a secondary ticket market: the case of StubHub and major league baseball Once upon a time: using brand stories to sell signature sneakers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1