根据2021年12月修正案,民事诉讼时效期间的中止

Przemysław Buczkowski
{"title":"根据2021年12月修正案,民事诉讼时效期间的中止","authors":"Przemysław Buczkowski","doi":"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.3.2022.28-p.buczkowski","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The purpose of this study was to analyse and assess the accuracy and completeness of the solutions introduced to the provisions of the Civil Code under the amendment of December 2, 2021 in the scope regarding the effects of mediation and submitting an invitation to a settlement attempt for the running of the limitation period for claims. The paper presents the leading views of science and judicature presented before the amendment which formed a basis for further considerations regarding the amended law. The analysis carried out with the use of the formal-dogmatic method made it possible to confirm the hypothesis about the accuracy and completeness of the amendment in regard with the issue concerning invitation to a settlement attempt. The legal norm introduced into the provisions of the Civil Code is exhaustive and allows a precise determination of the period for which the limitation period is suspended. The opposite conclusion can be drawn from the analysis of the solution to the issue of the effects of submitting a request for mediation. In this case, the regulation provided for by the legislator does not provide a sufficient answer to the question of when the period of suspension of the limitation period commences and ends. Thus, there is no precise regulation that would dispel doubts as to what specific circumstances determine the suspension of the limitation period.","PeriodicalId":33501,"journal":{"name":"Ius Novum","volume":"16 1","pages":"91 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suspension of the Limitation Period in Civil Law in the Light of the Amendment of December, 2021\",\"authors\":\"Przemysław Buczkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.3.2022.28-p.buczkowski\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The purpose of this study was to analyse and assess the accuracy and completeness of the solutions introduced to the provisions of the Civil Code under the amendment of December 2, 2021 in the scope regarding the effects of mediation and submitting an invitation to a settlement attempt for the running of the limitation period for claims. The paper presents the leading views of science and judicature presented before the amendment which formed a basis for further considerations regarding the amended law. The analysis carried out with the use of the formal-dogmatic method made it possible to confirm the hypothesis about the accuracy and completeness of the amendment in regard with the issue concerning invitation to a settlement attempt. The legal norm introduced into the provisions of the Civil Code is exhaustive and allows a precise determination of the period for which the limitation period is suspended. The opposite conclusion can be drawn from the analysis of the solution to the issue of the effects of submitting a request for mediation. In this case, the regulation provided for by the legislator does not provide a sufficient answer to the question of when the period of suspension of the limitation period commences and ends. Thus, there is no precise regulation that would dispel doubts as to what specific circumstances determine the suspension of the limitation period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ius Novum\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"91 - 109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ius Novum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.3.2022.28-p.buczkowski\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Novum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.3.2022.28-p.buczkowski","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是分析和评估根据2021年12月2日修正案对《民法典》条款提出的解决方案在调解效果范围内的准确性和完整性,并就索赔时效期的运行提交和解尝试邀请。本文介绍了修正案前提出的科学和司法的主要观点,为进一步思考修正案奠定了基础。使用正式教条主义方法进行的分析使我们能够证实关于邀请解决尝试问题的修正案的准确性和完整性的假设。《民法典》条款中引入的法律规范是详尽无遗的,可以准确确定诉讼时效的中止期限。从对提交调解请求的效果问题的解决办法的分析中可以得出相反的结论。在这种情况下,立法者规定的条例并没有充分回答诉讼时效中止期何时开始和结束的问题。因此,对于是什么具体情况决定了时效期的中止,没有确切的规定可以消除疑虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Suspension of the Limitation Period in Civil Law in the Light of the Amendment of December, 2021
Summary The purpose of this study was to analyse and assess the accuracy and completeness of the solutions introduced to the provisions of the Civil Code under the amendment of December 2, 2021 in the scope regarding the effects of mediation and submitting an invitation to a settlement attempt for the running of the limitation period for claims. The paper presents the leading views of science and judicature presented before the amendment which formed a basis for further considerations regarding the amended law. The analysis carried out with the use of the formal-dogmatic method made it possible to confirm the hypothesis about the accuracy and completeness of the amendment in regard with the issue concerning invitation to a settlement attempt. The legal norm introduced into the provisions of the Civil Code is exhaustive and allows a precise determination of the period for which the limitation period is suspended. The opposite conclusion can be drawn from the analysis of the solution to the issue of the effects of submitting a request for mediation. In this case, the regulation provided for by the legislator does not provide a sufficient answer to the question of when the period of suspension of the limitation period commences and ends. Thus, there is no precise regulation that would dispel doubts as to what specific circumstances determine the suspension of the limitation period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Paradox of Democratic Strengthening: Criminalisation of Political Terrorism as a Legal Discrediting Mechanism The Attack on the Protected Legal Interest: A Criminalisation Principle and an Element of the Criminal Offence? Amendment to the Rights and Obligations of a Journalist in Act: Press Law from the Perspective of Conscience Clause Key Elements of the Criminal Law Conflict System, with Special Reference to Spanish Criminal Law On the Concept of an Appellate Measure in a Criminal Proceeding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1