相互依赖公司决策的现金流敏感性——财务约束和套期保值需求的作用

Q4 Social Sciences Credit and Capital Markets Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.3790/ccm.51.2.259
C. Bannier, C. Schürg
{"title":"相互依赖公司决策的现金流敏感性——财务约束和套期保值需求的作用","authors":"C. Bannier, C. Schürg","doi":"10.3790/ccm.51.2.259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We examine the cash-flow sensitivities of firms’ simultaneous choice of investment, liquidity, dividends and net debt respectively equity financing in a large sample of US corporates between 1971 and 2016. We differentiate firms according to their (external) financial constraints and their (internal) needs to hedge against future shortfalls in operating income. Our estimation approach shows that financially constrained firms in our sample save more future funding capacity but invest and pay out less out of free cash flows than unconstrained firms. In the financial crisis 2007–2009, all firms invested less out of cash flow and raised their debt repayments, cash holdings and dividend payments. Constrained firms, however, show particularly strong increases in their cash savings but much smaller debt reductions compared to unconstrained firms – both in the crisis and post-crisis period. Internal hedging needs have different effects than external constraints: They weaken the build-up of future debt ca...","PeriodicalId":36966,"journal":{"name":"Credit and Capital Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cash-flow Sensitivities of Interdependent Corporate Decisions – The Role of Financial Constraints and Hedging Needs\",\"authors\":\"C. Bannier, C. Schürg\",\"doi\":\"10.3790/ccm.51.2.259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We examine the cash-flow sensitivities of firms’ simultaneous choice of investment, liquidity, dividends and net debt respectively equity financing in a large sample of US corporates between 1971 and 2016. We differentiate firms according to their (external) financial constraints and their (internal) needs to hedge against future shortfalls in operating income. Our estimation approach shows that financially constrained firms in our sample save more future funding capacity but invest and pay out less out of free cash flows than unconstrained firms. In the financial crisis 2007–2009, all firms invested less out of cash flow and raised their debt repayments, cash holdings and dividend payments. Constrained firms, however, show particularly strong increases in their cash savings but much smaller debt reductions compared to unconstrained firms – both in the crisis and post-crisis period. Internal hedging needs have different effects than external constraints: They weaken the build-up of future debt ca...\",\"PeriodicalId\":36966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Credit and Capital Markets\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Credit and Capital Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.51.2.259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Credit and Capital Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.51.2.259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要我们研究了1971年至2016年间,在大量美国企业样本中,企业同时选择投资、流动性、股息和净债务股权融资的现金流敏感性。我们根据公司(外部)的财务约束和(内部)对冲未来营业收入短缺的需求来区分公司。我们的估计方法表明,在我们的样本中,财务受限的公司比不受约束的公司节省了更多的未来融资能力,但从自由现金流中投资和支付的更少。在2007-2009年的金融危机中,所有公司的现金流投资都减少了,并增加了债务偿还、现金持有和股息支付。然而,无论是在危机期间还是危机后时期,受约束的公司的现金储蓄都表现出特别强劲的增长,但与不受约束的企业相比,债务减少幅度要小得多。内部对冲需求与外部约束有不同的影响:它们削弱了未来债务的积累。。。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cash-flow Sensitivities of Interdependent Corporate Decisions – The Role of Financial Constraints and Hedging Needs
Abstract We examine the cash-flow sensitivities of firms’ simultaneous choice of investment, liquidity, dividends and net debt respectively equity financing in a large sample of US corporates between 1971 and 2016. We differentiate firms according to their (external) financial constraints and their (internal) needs to hedge against future shortfalls in operating income. Our estimation approach shows that financially constrained firms in our sample save more future funding capacity but invest and pay out less out of free cash flows than unconstrained firms. In the financial crisis 2007–2009, all firms invested less out of cash flow and raised their debt repayments, cash holdings and dividend payments. Constrained firms, however, show particularly strong increases in their cash savings but much smaller debt reductions compared to unconstrained firms – both in the crisis and post-crisis period. Internal hedging needs have different effects than external constraints: They weaken the build-up of future debt ca...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Credit and Capital Markets
Credit and Capital Markets Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
54th Konstanz Seminar on Monetary Theory and Policy 2023 A Novel Default Risk Prediction and Feature Importance Analysis Technique for Marketplace Lending using Machine Learning German FinTech Companies: A Market Overview and Volume Estimates FinTech and the Digital Transformation in the Financial Industry Towards a Theory on Dominant Business Model Emergence of Marketplace Lending in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1