沉默的死亡:对英国与挥发性药物滥用有关的新死亡率数据的评论

IF 0.9 Q3 Psychology Drugs and Alcohol Today Pub Date : 2019-01-07 DOI:10.1108/DAT-08-2018-0039
V. Leigh, S. Maclean
{"title":"沉默的死亡:对英国与挥发性药物滥用有关的新死亡率数据的评论","authors":"V. Leigh, S. Maclean","doi":"10.1108/DAT-08-2018-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on new information from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on deaths caused by volatile substance abuse (VSA) in Great Britain which occurred between 2001 and 2016.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nComparing the new study with previous mortality data, the authors consider the strengths and some limitations of the analysis provided by ONS.\n\n\nFindings\nBy utilising a broader range of codes and collating additional information from death certificates, the new report provides a more comprehensive measure of VSA mortality than was previously available, showing increasing prevalence of deaths. The age profile of people dying is older than in previous studies. Most deaths were associated with inhalation of gases and almost three-quarters of deaths involved volatile substances alone.\n\n\nPractical implications\nUnderstanding VSA mortality is essential for service planning. It is important that we identify why so many people whose deaths are associated with VSA are not accessing treatment, with particular concern about treatment access for those who only use volatiles. Training to support drug and alcohol and other health service staff to respond to VSA is essential. In future reports, data to identify socioeconomic correlations of VSA deaths would enable targeted responses. Additionally, information on whether deaths occur in long term rather than episodic or one-off users could enable risk reduction education.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper shows how data on VSA deaths may inform for policy and service planning.\n","PeriodicalId":44780,"journal":{"name":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/DAT-08-2018-0039","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Silent deaths: a commentary on new mortality data relating to volatile substance abuse in Great Britain\",\"authors\":\"V. Leigh, S. Maclean\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/DAT-08-2018-0039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on new information from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on deaths caused by volatile substance abuse (VSA) in Great Britain which occurred between 2001 and 2016.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nComparing the new study with previous mortality data, the authors consider the strengths and some limitations of the analysis provided by ONS.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nBy utilising a broader range of codes and collating additional information from death certificates, the new report provides a more comprehensive measure of VSA mortality than was previously available, showing increasing prevalence of deaths. The age profile of people dying is older than in previous studies. Most deaths were associated with inhalation of gases and almost three-quarters of deaths involved volatile substances alone.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nUnderstanding VSA mortality is essential for service planning. It is important that we identify why so many people whose deaths are associated with VSA are not accessing treatment, with particular concern about treatment access for those who only use volatiles. Training to support drug and alcohol and other health service staff to respond to VSA is essential. In future reports, data to identify socioeconomic correlations of VSA deaths would enable targeted responses. Additionally, information on whether deaths occur in long term rather than episodic or one-off users could enable risk reduction education.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper shows how data on VSA deaths may inform for policy and service planning.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs and Alcohol Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/DAT-08-2018-0039\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs and Alcohol Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-08-2018-0039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-08-2018-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是对国家统计局(ONS)关于2001年至2016年英国挥发性物质滥用(VSA)导致的死亡的新信息进行评论。设计/方法/方法将新研究与以前的死亡率数据进行比较,作者认为国家统计局提供的分析的优势和一些局限性。通过使用更广泛的代码并整理死亡证明中的其他信息,新报告提供了比以前更全面的VSA死亡率衡量标准,显示出死亡率的上升。死亡人数的年龄比以前的研究要大。大多数死亡与吸入气体有关,几乎四分之三的死亡仅与挥发性物质有关。实际意义了解VSA死亡率对于服务规划至关重要。重要的是,我们要确定为什么这么多与VSA相关的死亡患者没有获得治疗,特别要关注那些只使用挥发物的患者的治疗可及性。培训支持毒品和酒精以及其他保健服务人员应对VSA至关重要。在未来的报告中,确定VSA死亡的社会经济相关性的数据将使有针对性的反应成为可能。此外,关于死亡是否发生在长期而非偶发或一次性使用者中的信息,可有助于开展减少风险教育。原创性/价值本文展示了VSA死亡数据如何为政策和服务规划提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Silent deaths: a commentary on new mortality data relating to volatile substance abuse in Great Britain
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on new information from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on deaths caused by volatile substance abuse (VSA) in Great Britain which occurred between 2001 and 2016. Design/methodology/approach Comparing the new study with previous mortality data, the authors consider the strengths and some limitations of the analysis provided by ONS. Findings By utilising a broader range of codes and collating additional information from death certificates, the new report provides a more comprehensive measure of VSA mortality than was previously available, showing increasing prevalence of deaths. The age profile of people dying is older than in previous studies. Most deaths were associated with inhalation of gases and almost three-quarters of deaths involved volatile substances alone. Practical implications Understanding VSA mortality is essential for service planning. It is important that we identify why so many people whose deaths are associated with VSA are not accessing treatment, with particular concern about treatment access for those who only use volatiles. Training to support drug and alcohol and other health service staff to respond to VSA is essential. In future reports, data to identify socioeconomic correlations of VSA deaths would enable targeted responses. Additionally, information on whether deaths occur in long term rather than episodic or one-off users could enable risk reduction education. Originality/value This paper shows how data on VSA deaths may inform for policy and service planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs and Alcohol Today
Drugs and Alcohol Today SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The misuse of drugs act – a user perspective More harm than good? Cannabis, harm and the misuse of drugs act Risk perception, health stressors and reduction in sharing cannabis products during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study From law to regulation: re-appraising the misuse of Drugs Act 1971 Fifty years of the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971: the legislative contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1