土工合成筋墙承载力破坏试验分析

IF 2.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geosynthetics International Pub Date : 2022-09-29 DOI:10.1680/jgein.22.00296
J. Derksen, M. Ziegler, R. Fuentes
{"title":"土工合成筋墙承载力破坏试验分析","authors":"J. Derksen, M. Ziegler, R. Fuentes","doi":"10.1680/jgein.22.00296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small- and large-scale 1g experiments were conducted to investigate the bearing capacity failure of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls. The small-scale experiments (1/10) provided fundamental insights into the development of failure based on digital image correlation analysis. Since these tests suffered from scale effects, large-scale tests (1/1.67) were performed to quantify the ultimate load-bearing capacity of a 1.2 m high wall. A vertical load was applied on top of the structures and internal soil movements and stresses, wall deformations and reinforcement strains were measured. The experimental results revealed that the failure was initially triggered at the rear end of the bottom reinforcement. The wall rotated to the backfill and the ground surface in front of the wall was uplifted. The results confirmed the quasi-monolithic behaviour of the reinforced zone. A multi-body failure mechanism was observed below the base of the wall, consisting of an active and passive wedge connected by a transition zone. Important scaling factors were discussed using the two different scales which has shown important conclusions that are relevant for experimental studies. The analytical calculations revealed that a reduced reinforcement length needs to be considered in the analytical approach to predict a rather conservative load-bearing capacity.","PeriodicalId":12616,"journal":{"name":"Geosynthetics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental analysis of bearing capacity failure of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls\",\"authors\":\"J. Derksen, M. Ziegler, R. Fuentes\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jgein.22.00296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Small- and large-scale 1g experiments were conducted to investigate the bearing capacity failure of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls. The small-scale experiments (1/10) provided fundamental insights into the development of failure based on digital image correlation analysis. Since these tests suffered from scale effects, large-scale tests (1/1.67) were performed to quantify the ultimate load-bearing capacity of a 1.2 m high wall. A vertical load was applied on top of the structures and internal soil movements and stresses, wall deformations and reinforcement strains were measured. The experimental results revealed that the failure was initially triggered at the rear end of the bottom reinforcement. The wall rotated to the backfill and the ground surface in front of the wall was uplifted. The results confirmed the quasi-monolithic behaviour of the reinforced zone. A multi-body failure mechanism was observed below the base of the wall, consisting of an active and passive wedge connected by a transition zone. Important scaling factors were discussed using the two different scales which has shown important conclusions that are relevant for experimental studies. The analytical calculations revealed that a reduced reinforcement length needs to be considered in the analytical approach to predict a rather conservative load-bearing capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geosynthetics International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geosynthetics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.22.00296\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosynthetics International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.22.00296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

采用小型和大型1g试验研究了土工合成筋墙的承载力破坏。小规模实验(1/10)为基于数字图像相关分析的失效发展提供了基本见解。由于这些试验受到尺度效应的影响,因此进行了大规模试验(1/1.67),以量化1.2米高墙体的极限承载能力。在结构顶部施加垂直荷载,测量内部土体运动和应力、墙体变形和钢筋应变。试验结果表明,破坏最初是在底部钢筋的后端触发的。墙体向回填体旋转,墙体前的地表被抬升。结果证实了加固区的准整体行为。在墙底以下观察到多体破坏机制,由过渡区连接的主动和被动楔组成。用两种不同的量表讨论了重要的比例因子,得出了与实验研究相关的重要结论。分析计算表明,在分析方法中需要考虑减小的钢筋长度以预测相当保守的承载能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental analysis of bearing capacity failure of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls
Small- and large-scale 1g experiments were conducted to investigate the bearing capacity failure of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls. The small-scale experiments (1/10) provided fundamental insights into the development of failure based on digital image correlation analysis. Since these tests suffered from scale effects, large-scale tests (1/1.67) were performed to quantify the ultimate load-bearing capacity of a 1.2 m high wall. A vertical load was applied on top of the structures and internal soil movements and stresses, wall deformations and reinforcement strains were measured. The experimental results revealed that the failure was initially triggered at the rear end of the bottom reinforcement. The wall rotated to the backfill and the ground surface in front of the wall was uplifted. The results confirmed the quasi-monolithic behaviour of the reinforced zone. A multi-body failure mechanism was observed below the base of the wall, consisting of an active and passive wedge connected by a transition zone. Important scaling factors were discussed using the two different scales which has shown important conclusions that are relevant for experimental studies. The analytical calculations revealed that a reduced reinforcement length needs to be considered in the analytical approach to predict a rather conservative load-bearing capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geosynthetics International
Geosynthetics International ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An online only, rapid publication journal, Geosynthetics International – an official journal of the International Geosynthetics Society (IGS) – publishes the best information on current geosynthetics technology in research, design innovation, new materials and construction practice. Topics covered The whole of geosynthetic materials (including natural fibre products) such as research, behaviour, performance analysis, testing, design, construction methods, case histories and field experience. Geosynthetics International is received by all members of the IGS as part of their membership, and is published in e-only format six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Na-CMC-amended clay: effect of mixing method on hydraulic conductivity and polymer elution A nonlinear analytical model for consolidated geotextile-encased sand columns Geotextile filters: from idealization to real behaviour (Giroud Lecture 2023) Mechanical characteristics of geogrids produced from recycled polyester Natural weathering effects of nonwoven geotextile exposed to different climate conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1