GRE®ScoreSelect®对GRE®普通考试成绩亚组差异的可能影响研究

Q3 Social Sciences ETS Research Report Series Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI:10.1002/ets2.12356
David M. Klieger, Lauren J. Kotloff, Vinetha Belur, Megan E. Schramm-Possinger, Steven L. Holtzman, Hezekiah Bunde
{"title":"GRE®ScoreSelect®对GRE®普通考试成绩亚组差异的可能影响研究","authors":"David M. Klieger,&nbsp;Lauren J. Kotloff,&nbsp;Vinetha Belur,&nbsp;Megan E. Schramm-Possinger,&nbsp;Steven L. Holtzman,&nbsp;Hezekiah Bunde","doi":"10.1002/ets2.12356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intended consequences of giving applicants the option to select which test scores to report include potentially reducing measurement error and inequity in applicants' prior test familiarity. Our first study determined whether score choice options resulted in unintended consequences for lower performing subgroups by detrimentally increasing score gaps in ways and for reasons that the research literature had suggested. Our follow-up study explored possible determinants of changes in score gaps attributable to score choice options. Using <i>GRE® SCORESELECT®</i>, the score choice system for the GRE general test, we concluded that unintended consequences were few, small in magnitude, and usually undetectable. To the extent that unintended consequences occurred, they were limited to effects for citizenship subgroups and generally benefited lower performing subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":11972,"journal":{"name":"ETS Research Report Series","volume":"2022 1","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ets2.12356","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studies of Possible Effects of GRE® ScoreSelect® on Subgroup Differences in GRE® General Test Scores\",\"authors\":\"David M. Klieger,&nbsp;Lauren J. Kotloff,&nbsp;Vinetha Belur,&nbsp;Megan E. Schramm-Possinger,&nbsp;Steven L. Holtzman,&nbsp;Hezekiah Bunde\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ets2.12356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Intended consequences of giving applicants the option to select which test scores to report include potentially reducing measurement error and inequity in applicants' prior test familiarity. Our first study determined whether score choice options resulted in unintended consequences for lower performing subgroups by detrimentally increasing score gaps in ways and for reasons that the research literature had suggested. Our follow-up study explored possible determinants of changes in score gaps attributable to score choice options. Using <i>GRE® SCORESELECT®</i>, the score choice system for the GRE general test, we concluded that unintended consequences were few, small in magnitude, and usually undetectable. To the extent that unintended consequences occurred, they were limited to effects for citizenship subgroups and generally benefited lower performing subgroups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ETS Research Report Series\",\"volume\":\"2022 1\",\"pages\":\"1-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ets2.12356\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ETS Research Report Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ets2.12356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ETS Research Report Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ets2.12356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

让申请人选择报告哪些考试成绩的预期后果包括潜在地减少测量误差和申请人对先前考试熟悉程度的不平等。我们的第一项研究确定了分数选择选项是否会对表现较差的亚组造成意想不到的后果,因为它以研究文献所建议的方式和原因有害地增加了分数差距。我们的后续研究探讨了分数选择选项导致分数差距变化的可能决定因素。使用GRE普通考试的分数选择系统GRE®SCORESELECT®,我们得出的结论是,意外后果很少,幅度小,通常无法检测到。在某种程度上,意想不到的后果发生了,它们仅限于对公民身份子群体的影响,并且通常使表现较差的子群体受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Studies of Possible Effects of GRE® ScoreSelect® on Subgroup Differences in GRE® General Test Scores

Intended consequences of giving applicants the option to select which test scores to report include potentially reducing measurement error and inequity in applicants' prior test familiarity. Our first study determined whether score choice options resulted in unintended consequences for lower performing subgroups by detrimentally increasing score gaps in ways and for reasons that the research literature had suggested. Our follow-up study explored possible determinants of changes in score gaps attributable to score choice options. Using GRE® SCORESELECT®, the score choice system for the GRE general test, we concluded that unintended consequences were few, small in magnitude, and usually undetectable. To the extent that unintended consequences occurred, they were limited to effects for citizenship subgroups and generally benefited lower performing subgroups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ETS Research Report Series
ETS Research Report Series Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Building a Validity Argument for the TOEFL Junior® Tests Validity, Reliability, and Fairness Evidence for the JD‐Next Exam Practical Considerations in Item Calibration With Small Samples Under Multistage Test Design: A Case Study Practical Considerations in Item Calibration With Small Samples Under Multistage Test Design: A Case Study Modeling Writing Traits in a Formative Essay Corpus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1