基于流固耦合的双超纤织物结构在变风速下的响应

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures Pub Date : 2021-03-03 DOI:10.1590/1679-78256367
J. Valdés-Vázquez, A. García-Soto, M. Chiumenti
{"title":"基于流固耦合的双超纤织物结构在变风速下的响应","authors":"J. Valdés-Vázquez, A. García-Soto, M. Chiumenti","doi":"10.1590/1679-78256367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"WIND EFFECTS ON TENSILE FABRIC STRUCTURES (TFS) ARE NOT EXTENSIVELY INVESTIGATED. AVAILABLE STUDIES IN THE LITERATURE CONSIDER SIMPLIFIED TFS SUPPORT CONDITIONS. COMPARISONS BETWEEN STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ARE LACKING. THE RESPONSE OF A DOUBLE HYPAR TFS UNDER VARYING WIND SPEED IS CARRIED OUT BY USING FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION (FSI). REALISTIC SUPPORT CONDITIONS ARE CONSIDERED. THE DOUBLE HYPAR GEOMETRY IS DETERMINED THROUGH FORM-FINDING. COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) IS THE BASIS TO PERFORM DYNAMIC ANALYSIS TO PROPOSE PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS USEFUL FOR DESIGN. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DYNAMIC AND STATIC ANALYSES ARE ASSESSED. IT IS FOUND THAT THE STRESSES IN THE FABRIC AND AXIAL FORCES IN THE SUPPORTS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FOR EACH TYPE OF ANALYSIS, WHICH CANNOT BE CAPTURED BY SIMPLIFIED UNIFORM UPLIFT WIND AND SNOW LOADINGS. STATIC ANALYSIS USING PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS LEADS TO DIFFERENCES OF UP TO 17.3% FOR STRESSES IN THE FABRIC, 10.5% FOR THE COMPRESSIVE FORCE IN THE MASTS AND 33.5% FOR THE TENSILE FORCE IN THE CABLES, COMPARED TO A FSI ANALYSIS. RESULTS GIVE FURTHER INSIGHT INTO THE WIND RESPONSE OF REALISTIC TFSS.","PeriodicalId":18192,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of a Double Hypar Fabric Structure Under Varying Wind Speed Using Fluid-Structure Interaction\",\"authors\":\"J. Valdés-Vázquez, A. García-Soto, M. Chiumenti\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1679-78256367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"WIND EFFECTS ON TENSILE FABRIC STRUCTURES (TFS) ARE NOT EXTENSIVELY INVESTIGATED. AVAILABLE STUDIES IN THE LITERATURE CONSIDER SIMPLIFIED TFS SUPPORT CONDITIONS. COMPARISONS BETWEEN STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ARE LACKING. THE RESPONSE OF A DOUBLE HYPAR TFS UNDER VARYING WIND SPEED IS CARRIED OUT BY USING FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION (FSI). REALISTIC SUPPORT CONDITIONS ARE CONSIDERED. THE DOUBLE HYPAR GEOMETRY IS DETERMINED THROUGH FORM-FINDING. COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) IS THE BASIS TO PERFORM DYNAMIC ANALYSIS TO PROPOSE PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS USEFUL FOR DESIGN. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DYNAMIC AND STATIC ANALYSES ARE ASSESSED. IT IS FOUND THAT THE STRESSES IN THE FABRIC AND AXIAL FORCES IN THE SUPPORTS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FOR EACH TYPE OF ANALYSIS, WHICH CANNOT BE CAPTURED BY SIMPLIFIED UNIFORM UPLIFT WIND AND SNOW LOADINGS. STATIC ANALYSIS USING PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS LEADS TO DIFFERENCES OF UP TO 17.3% FOR STRESSES IN THE FABRIC, 10.5% FOR THE COMPRESSIVE FORCE IN THE MASTS AND 33.5% FOR THE TENSILE FORCE IN THE CABLES, COMPARED TO A FSI ANALYSIS. RESULTS GIVE FURTHER INSIGHT INTO THE WIND RESPONSE OF REALISTIC TFSS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78256367\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78256367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

风对拉伸织物结构(tfs)的影响尚未得到广泛研究。文献中已有的研究考虑了简化的TFS支持条件。缺乏静态和动态分析之间的比较。利用流固相互作用(fsi)方法,研究了双超高压TFS在不同风速下的响应。考虑了实际的支撑条件。通过寻形确定双超平面几何。计算流体动力学(cfd)是进行动力分析以提出对设计有用的压力系数的基础。动态和静态分析之间的差异进行了评估。研究发现,在不同的分析类型中,织物中的应力和支撑中的轴向力存在显著差异,这无法通过简化的均匀抬升风和雪荷载来捕捉。与fsi分析相比,使用压力系数的静态分析导致织物应力差异达17.3%,桅杆压缩力差异达10.5%,电缆拉伸力差异达33.5%。研究结果进一步揭示了现实tss的风响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response of a Double Hypar Fabric Structure Under Varying Wind Speed Using Fluid-Structure Interaction
WIND EFFECTS ON TENSILE FABRIC STRUCTURES (TFS) ARE NOT EXTENSIVELY INVESTIGATED. AVAILABLE STUDIES IN THE LITERATURE CONSIDER SIMPLIFIED TFS SUPPORT CONDITIONS. COMPARISONS BETWEEN STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ARE LACKING. THE RESPONSE OF A DOUBLE HYPAR TFS UNDER VARYING WIND SPEED IS CARRIED OUT BY USING FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION (FSI). REALISTIC SUPPORT CONDITIONS ARE CONSIDERED. THE DOUBLE HYPAR GEOMETRY IS DETERMINED THROUGH FORM-FINDING. COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) IS THE BASIS TO PERFORM DYNAMIC ANALYSIS TO PROPOSE PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS USEFUL FOR DESIGN. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DYNAMIC AND STATIC ANALYSES ARE ASSESSED. IT IS FOUND THAT THE STRESSES IN THE FABRIC AND AXIAL FORCES IN THE SUPPORTS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FOR EACH TYPE OF ANALYSIS, WHICH CANNOT BE CAPTURED BY SIMPLIFIED UNIFORM UPLIFT WIND AND SNOW LOADINGS. STATIC ANALYSIS USING PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS LEADS TO DIFFERENCES OF UP TO 17.3% FOR STRESSES IN THE FABRIC, 10.5% FOR THE COMPRESSIVE FORCE IN THE MASTS AND 33.5% FOR THE TENSILE FORCE IN THE CABLES, COMPARED TO A FSI ANALYSIS. RESULTS GIVE FURTHER INSIGHT INTO THE WIND RESPONSE OF REALISTIC TFSS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reliability-based design of reinforced concrete pipes to satisfy the TEBT Innovative Approach for Enhancing GLULAM Performance with Reinforcing Steel Bars: A BESO-based Study Sequential method of topological optimization in multi-component systems Coupling Modal Analysis with the BEM for the Transient Response of Bar Structures Interacting with Three-Dimensional Soil Profiles Experimental and Numerical Study on Ballistic Impact Response of Vehicle Tires
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1