基于合成数据的可解释人工智能全局方法的评价指标研究

IF 3.8 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Applied System Innovation Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI:10.3390/asi6010026
Alexander D. Oblizanov, Natalya V. Shevskaya, A. Kazak, Marina Rudenko, Anna Dorofeeva
{"title":"基于合成数据的可解释人工智能全局方法的评价指标研究","authors":"Alexander D. Oblizanov, Natalya V. Shevskaya, A. Kazak, Marina Rudenko, Anna Dorofeeva","doi":"10.3390/asi6010026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, artificial intelligence technologies have been developing more and more rapidly, and a lot of research is aimed at solving the problem of explainable artificial intelligence. Various XAI methods are being developed to allow the user to understand the logic of how machine learning models work, and in order to compare the methods, it is necessary to evaluate them. The paper analyzes various approaches to the evaluation of XAI methods, defines the requirements for the evaluation system and suggests metrics to determine the various technical characteristics of the methods. A study was conducted, using these metrics, which determined the degradation in the explanation quality of the SHAP and LIME methods with increasing correlation in the input data. Recommendations are also given for further research in the field of practical implementation of metrics, expanding the scope of their use.","PeriodicalId":36273,"journal":{"name":"Applied System Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation Metrics Research for Explainable Artificial Intelligence Global Methods Using Synthetic Data\",\"authors\":\"Alexander D. Oblizanov, Natalya V. Shevskaya, A. Kazak, Marina Rudenko, Anna Dorofeeva\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/asi6010026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, artificial intelligence technologies have been developing more and more rapidly, and a lot of research is aimed at solving the problem of explainable artificial intelligence. Various XAI methods are being developed to allow the user to understand the logic of how machine learning models work, and in order to compare the methods, it is necessary to evaluate them. The paper analyzes various approaches to the evaluation of XAI methods, defines the requirements for the evaluation system and suggests metrics to determine the various technical characteristics of the methods. A study was conducted, using these metrics, which determined the degradation in the explanation quality of the SHAP and LIME methods with increasing correlation in the input data. Recommendations are also given for further research in the field of practical implementation of metrics, expanding the scope of their use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied System Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied System Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/asi6010026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied System Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/asi6010026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,人工智能技术发展越来越快,许多研究都是为了解决可解释的人工智能问题。正在开发各种XAI方法,以允许用户理解机器学习模型如何工作的逻辑,为了比较这些方法,有必要对它们进行评估。本文分析了XAI方法评估的各种方法,定义了评估系统的要求,并提出了确定方法各种技术特征的指标。使用这些指标进行了一项研究,确定了随着输入数据相关性的增加,SHAP和LIME方法的解释质量的下降。还提出了在度量的实际实现领域进行进一步研究的建议,扩大了它们的使用范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation Metrics Research for Explainable Artificial Intelligence Global Methods Using Synthetic Data
In recent years, artificial intelligence technologies have been developing more and more rapidly, and a lot of research is aimed at solving the problem of explainable artificial intelligence. Various XAI methods are being developed to allow the user to understand the logic of how machine learning models work, and in order to compare the methods, it is necessary to evaluate them. The paper analyzes various approaches to the evaluation of XAI methods, defines the requirements for the evaluation system and suggests metrics to determine the various technical characteristics of the methods. A study was conducted, using these metrics, which determined the degradation in the explanation quality of the SHAP and LIME methods with increasing correlation in the input data. Recommendations are also given for further research in the field of practical implementation of metrics, expanding the scope of their use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied System Innovation
Applied System Innovation Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
102
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Research on Chinese Nested Entity Recognition Based on IDCNNLR and GlobalPointer AI-Powered Academic Guidance and Counseling System Based on Student Profile and Interests Using Smart Traffic Lights to Reduce CO2 Emissions and Improve Traffic Flow at Intersections: Simulation of an Intersection in a Small Portuguese City Predictive Modeling of Light–Matter Interaction in One Dimension: A Dynamic Deep Learning Approach Project Management Efficiency Measurement with Data Envelopment Analysis: A Case in a Petrochemical Company
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1