对话语料库:当“大即美”

IF 0.1 Q4 LINGUISTICS CogniTextes Pub Date : 2019-06-17 DOI:10.4000/COGNITEXTES.1584
F. Newmeyer
{"title":"对话语料库:当“大即美”","authors":"F. Newmeyer","doi":"10.4000/COGNITEXTES.1584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to examine the relationship between corpus size and conclusions drawn from corpora regarding questions of grammatical theory. Many linguists, typically those with a ‘usage-based’ orientation, assert that introspective data, unlike corpus-derived data, is of little relevance to the construction of the correct theory of language. This paper challenges that view, arguing that introspective data and corpus-derived data do not lead to different conclusions about the nature of linguistic theory.","PeriodicalId":53774,"journal":{"name":"CogniTextes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversational corpora : when “big is beautiful”\",\"authors\":\"F. Newmeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/COGNITEXTES.1584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of this paper is to examine the relationship between corpus size and conclusions drawn from corpora regarding questions of grammatical theory. Many linguists, typically those with a ‘usage-based’ orientation, assert that introspective data, unlike corpus-derived data, is of little relevance to the construction of the correct theory of language. This paper challenges that view, arguing that introspective data and corpus-derived data do not lead to different conclusions about the nature of linguistic theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CogniTextes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CogniTextes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/COGNITEXTES.1584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CogniTextes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/COGNITEXTES.1584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是研究语料库大小与从语料库中得出的关于语法理论问题的结论之间的关系。许多语言学家,通常是那些“基于用法”的语言学家,断言内省数据与语料库衍生的数据不同,与正确的语言理论的构建无关。本文对这一观点提出了质疑,认为内省数据和语料库衍生数据不会导致对语言学理论本质的不同结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conversational corpora : when “big is beautiful”
The goal of this paper is to examine the relationship between corpus size and conclusions drawn from corpora regarding questions of grammatical theory. Many linguists, typically those with a ‘usage-based’ orientation, assert that introspective data, unlike corpus-derived data, is of little relevance to the construction of the correct theory of language. This paper challenges that view, arguing that introspective data and corpus-derived data do not lead to different conclusions about the nature of linguistic theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CogniTextes
CogniTextes LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating English clippings experimentally: Why markedness is always local: the case of Russian aspect Bounding in French and Romance Probing the role of bounding, definiteness and other factors: bare noun and determiner use in Guianese French Creole Reference, Deixis and Perspective.Aspectual Readings of Italian Ecco- and French
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1