数学教育中的STEM教育:关注小学学生的申论

Narumon Changsri, Maitree Inprasitha
{"title":"数学教育中的STEM教育:关注小学学生的申论","authors":"Narumon Changsri, Maitree Inprasitha","doi":"10.14456/EASR.2018.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to explore student argumentation in a mathematics classroom using lesson study and an open approach. The research methodology employed a qualitative approach that focused on the protocols of student problem solving and the results of the study are presented as an analytical description. The target group was 14 third grade students, divided into four groups in the 2016 academic year. This research collected data while teaching with a lesson study and open approach, analyzing student argumentation. The results revealed that the students who attended mathematics classes with a lesson study and open approach went through the four steps of the argumentation process, which occurred in the second step of the open approach, promoting student self-learning.","PeriodicalId":37310,"journal":{"name":"Engineering and Applied Science Research","volume":"45 1","pages":"316-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STEM education in mathematics education: focusing on students’ argumentation in primary school\",\"authors\":\"Narumon Changsri, Maitree Inprasitha\",\"doi\":\"10.14456/EASR.2018.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to explore student argumentation in a mathematics classroom using lesson study and an open approach. The research methodology employed a qualitative approach that focused on the protocols of student problem solving and the results of the study are presented as an analytical description. The target group was 14 third grade students, divided into four groups in the 2016 academic year. This research collected data while teaching with a lesson study and open approach, analyzing student argumentation. The results revealed that the students who attended mathematics classes with a lesson study and open approach went through the four steps of the argumentation process, which occurred in the second step of the open approach, promoting student self-learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering and Applied Science Research\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"316-319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering and Applied Science Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14456/EASR.2018.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering and Applied Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14456/EASR.2018.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在探讨学生在数学课堂上运用课堂研究和开放的方法进行辩论。研究方法采用定性方法,重点关注学生解决问题的协议,研究结果以分析描述的形式呈现。目标群体为14名三年级学生,在2016学年分为四组。本研究采用课堂研究和开放式教学的方法,在教学中收集数据,分析学生的论证。结果表明,采用课堂学习和开放式教学的数学学生经历了开放式教学第二阶段的论证过程的四个步骤,促进了学生的自主学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STEM education in mathematics education: focusing on students’ argumentation in primary school
This study aimed to explore student argumentation in a mathematics classroom using lesson study and an open approach. The research methodology employed a qualitative approach that focused on the protocols of student problem solving and the results of the study are presented as an analytical description. The target group was 14 third grade students, divided into four groups in the 2016 academic year. This research collected data while teaching with a lesson study and open approach, analyzing student argumentation. The results revealed that the students who attended mathematics classes with a lesson study and open approach went through the four steps of the argumentation process, which occurred in the second step of the open approach, promoting student self-learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering and Applied Science Research
Engineering and Applied Science Research Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Publication of the journal started in 1974. Its original name was “KKU Engineering Journal”. English and Thai manuscripts were accepted. The journal was originally aimed at publishing research that was conducted and implemented in the northeast of Thailand. It is regarded a national journal and has been indexed in the Thai-journal Citation Index (TCI) database since 2004. The journal now accepts only English language manuscripts and became open-access in 2015 to attract more international readers. It was renamed Engineering and Applied Science Research in 2017. The editorial team agreed to publish more international papers, therefore, the new journal title is more appropriate. The journal focuses on research in the field of engineering that not only presents highly original ideas and advanced technology, but also are practical applications of appropriate technology.
期刊最新文献
Logistic model for adherence to ministry of health protocols and guidelines by public transport vehicles in Kenya during covid-19 pandemic Disclosing fast moving consumer goods demand forecasting predictor using multi linear regression Evaluation of ground-based, daily, gridded precipitation products for Upper Benue River basin, Nigeria Corrosion behavior of ca6nm in simulated geothermal brine highlighted by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (Eis) Exploring determinants of travel-mode choice during the covid-19 pandemic outbreak: A case study of Islamabad, Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1