{"title":"一位本土人类学家对“阿尔泰公主”问题的研究","authors":"N. Tadina","doi":"10.1080/10611959.2020.1950477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores conflicts between the Altai community and archeologists due to the discovery of a woman’s mummy, the “Altai Princess,” found in a burial mound of the Pazyryk time (5th–3rd centuries BCE) in the south of Siberia, in the Republic of Altai (Russia). It is argued that a “Native anthropologist” studying her own people and a “visiting anthropologist” illuminates the problem each in their own ways. Attention is drawn to facts indicating the importance of using Indigenous methodologies and research approaches from within a given ethnic culture to understand folk interpretations adequately. Key positions concerning the Altai are outlined on the basis of the author’s field materials. It is emphasized that the demand to (re)bury the “Altai Princess” is based on the tradition of observing the “border” between the earthly and the other world. This corresponds to a key idea of Burkhanism in ritual and everyday life. Discourse about the “Altai princess” can be understood through Altai traditional sacral concepts and practices. Outsider anthropologists’ abstract assertions claiming that the Altai national intelligentsia is responsible for social conflict with archeologists are questioned.","PeriodicalId":35495,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Native Anthropologist’s View on Covering the “Altai Princess” Problem\",\"authors\":\"N. Tadina\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611959.2020.1950477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article explores conflicts between the Altai community and archeologists due to the discovery of a woman’s mummy, the “Altai Princess,” found in a burial mound of the Pazyryk time (5th–3rd centuries BCE) in the south of Siberia, in the Republic of Altai (Russia). It is argued that a “Native anthropologist” studying her own people and a “visiting anthropologist” illuminates the problem each in their own ways. Attention is drawn to facts indicating the importance of using Indigenous methodologies and research approaches from within a given ethnic culture to understand folk interpretations adequately. Key positions concerning the Altai are outlined on the basis of the author’s field materials. It is emphasized that the demand to (re)bury the “Altai Princess” is based on the tradition of observing the “border” between the earthly and the other world. This corresponds to a key idea of Burkhanism in ritual and everyday life. Discourse about the “Altai princess” can be understood through Altai traditional sacral concepts and practices. Outsider anthropologists’ abstract assertions claiming that the Altai national intelligentsia is responsible for social conflict with archeologists are questioned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2020.1950477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2020.1950477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Native Anthropologist’s View on Covering the “Altai Princess” Problem
ABSTRACT This article explores conflicts between the Altai community and archeologists due to the discovery of a woman’s mummy, the “Altai Princess,” found in a burial mound of the Pazyryk time (5th–3rd centuries BCE) in the south of Siberia, in the Republic of Altai (Russia). It is argued that a “Native anthropologist” studying her own people and a “visiting anthropologist” illuminates the problem each in their own ways. Attention is drawn to facts indicating the importance of using Indigenous methodologies and research approaches from within a given ethnic culture to understand folk interpretations adequately. Key positions concerning the Altai are outlined on the basis of the author’s field materials. It is emphasized that the demand to (re)bury the “Altai Princess” is based on the tradition of observing the “border” between the earthly and the other world. This corresponds to a key idea of Burkhanism in ritual and everyday life. Discourse about the “Altai princess” can be understood through Altai traditional sacral concepts and practices. Outsider anthropologists’ abstract assertions claiming that the Altai national intelligentsia is responsible for social conflict with archeologists are questioned.
期刊介绍:
Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia presents scholarship from Russia, Siberia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia, the vast region that stretches from the Baltic to the Black Sea and from Lake Baikal to the Bering Strait. Each thematic issue, with a substantive introduction to the topic by the editor, features expertly translated and annotated manuscripts, articles, and book excerpts reporting fieldwork from every part of the region and theoretical studies on topics of special interest.