克林霉素管理:伊朗拉希特拉齐医院住院病人的机会

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrptps.JRPTPS_74_19
S. Ala, A. Kamali, Razieh Avan
{"title":"克林霉素管理:伊朗拉希特拉齐医院住院病人的机会","authors":"S. Ala, A. Kamali, Razieh Avan","doi":"10.4103/jrptps.JRPTPS_74_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In hospitalized patients, the most common used drugs are antibiotics. Programs designed to rational use of antibiotics improve the quality of care and infection management, and reduce costs. Aims and Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the rational use of clindamycin in Razi Hospital, Rasht, Iran. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed in Razi Hospital, Rasht, Iran. All hospitalized patients who received clindamycin were included. Patient’s demographic, duration of use and dose of clindamycin therapy, and other concomitant antibiotics were collected from patients’ medical records. Rational clindamycin prescribing was evaluated based on recommendations of UpToDate software, version 21.6, Waltham, MA, United States. Analysis of data was performed by the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, version 16.0. Results: A total of 607 patients receiving clindamycin during 15 months of study were evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 51.51 ± 15.92 years (range: 16–87 years). The most hospitalized patients receiving clindamycin were in internal ward (86%). The most frequently coadministered antibiotics with clindamycin were third-generation cephalosporins (47.9%). The majority of patients admitted in the winter (40.4%). The most frequently primary and final diagnosis in patients receiving clindamycin was reported pneumonia, respectively, 33.1% and 32.1%. Indication, dose, and duration of clindamycin were appropriate in 583 (96%), 277(47.5%), and 208 (35.7%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: The rate of incorrect dose and duration of clindamycin in our hospital were significantly high. Also, the majority of its prescription were as off-label indications. Programs for more justified administration of clindamycin to improve quality of care and decrease antibacterial resistance and cost are necessary.","PeriodicalId":16966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clindamycin stewardship: An opportunity for hospitalized patients in Razi Hospital, Rasht, Iran\",\"authors\":\"S. Ala, A. Kamali, Razieh Avan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jrptps.JRPTPS_74_19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In hospitalized patients, the most common used drugs are antibiotics. Programs designed to rational use of antibiotics improve the quality of care and infection management, and reduce costs. Aims and Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the rational use of clindamycin in Razi Hospital, Rasht, Iran. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed in Razi Hospital, Rasht, Iran. All hospitalized patients who received clindamycin were included. Patient’s demographic, duration of use and dose of clindamycin therapy, and other concomitant antibiotics were collected from patients’ medical records. Rational clindamycin prescribing was evaluated based on recommendations of UpToDate software, version 21.6, Waltham, MA, United States. Analysis of data was performed by the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, version 16.0. Results: A total of 607 patients receiving clindamycin during 15 months of study were evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 51.51 ± 15.92 years (range: 16–87 years). The most hospitalized patients receiving clindamycin were in internal ward (86%). The most frequently coadministered antibiotics with clindamycin were third-generation cephalosporins (47.9%). The majority of patients admitted in the winter (40.4%). The most frequently primary and final diagnosis in patients receiving clindamycin was reported pneumonia, respectively, 33.1% and 32.1%. Indication, dose, and duration of clindamycin were appropriate in 583 (96%), 277(47.5%), and 208 (35.7%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: The rate of incorrect dose and duration of clindamycin in our hospital were significantly high. Also, the majority of its prescription were as off-label indications. Programs for more justified administration of clindamycin to improve quality of care and decrease antibacterial resistance and cost are necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrptps.JRPTPS_74_19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrptps.JRPTPS_74_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在住院患者中,最常用的药物是抗生素。旨在合理使用抗生素的规划提高了护理和感染管理的质量,并降低了成本。目的和目的:本研究的目的是评估克林霉素在伊朗Rasht Razi医院的合理使用情况。材料和方法:本回顾性横断面研究在伊朗Rasht的Razi医院进行。所有接受克林霉素治疗的住院患者均纳入研究。从患者的医疗记录中收集患者的人口统计、克林霉素治疗的使用时间和剂量以及其他伴随抗生素。根据UpToDate软件版本21.6,Waltham, MA, usa的推荐对克林霉素合理处方进行评价。数据分析使用社会科学统计软件包16.0版软件进行。结果:在15个月的研究期间,共有607例患者接受了克林霉素治疗。患者平均年龄51.51±15.92岁(范围16 ~ 87岁)。接受克林霉素治疗的住院患者以内科病房居多(86%)。与克林霉素共同使用最多的抗生素是第三代头孢菌素(47.9%)。以冬季住院患者居多(40.4%)。在接受克林霉素治疗的患者中,最常见的最初诊断和最终诊断分别为肺炎,分别为33.1%和32.1%。583例(96%)、277例(47.5%)和208例(35.7%)患者克林霉素的适应症、剂量和持续时间合适。结论:我院克林霉素用药剂量和用药时间错误发生率较高。此外,它的大多数处方都是标签外适应症。有必要制定更合理的克林霉素管理方案,以提高护理质量,降低抗菌药物耐药性和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clindamycin stewardship: An opportunity for hospitalized patients in Razi Hospital, Rasht, Iran
Background: In hospitalized patients, the most common used drugs are antibiotics. Programs designed to rational use of antibiotics improve the quality of care and infection management, and reduce costs. Aims and Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the rational use of clindamycin in Razi Hospital, Rasht, Iran. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed in Razi Hospital, Rasht, Iran. All hospitalized patients who received clindamycin were included. Patient’s demographic, duration of use and dose of clindamycin therapy, and other concomitant antibiotics were collected from patients’ medical records. Rational clindamycin prescribing was evaluated based on recommendations of UpToDate software, version 21.6, Waltham, MA, United States. Analysis of data was performed by the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, version 16.0. Results: A total of 607 patients receiving clindamycin during 15 months of study were evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 51.51 ± 15.92 years (range: 16–87 years). The most hospitalized patients receiving clindamycin were in internal ward (86%). The most frequently coadministered antibiotics with clindamycin were third-generation cephalosporins (47.9%). The majority of patients admitted in the winter (40.4%). The most frequently primary and final diagnosis in patients receiving clindamycin was reported pneumonia, respectively, 33.1% and 32.1%. Indication, dose, and duration of clindamycin were appropriate in 583 (96%), 277(47.5%), and 208 (35.7%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: The rate of incorrect dose and duration of clindamycin in our hospital were significantly high. Also, the majority of its prescription were as off-label indications. Programs for more justified administration of clindamycin to improve quality of care and decrease antibacterial resistance and cost are necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences
Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences(JRPS) is a biannually peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary pharmaceutical publication to serve as a means for scientific information exchange in the international pharmaceutical forum. It accepts novel findings that contribute to advancement of scientific knowledge in pharmaceutical fields that not published or under consideration for publication anywhere else for publication in JRPS as original research article. all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences consist of medicinal chemistry, molecular modeling, drug design, pharmaceutics, biopharmacy, pharmaceutical nanotechnology, pharmacognosy, natural products, pharmaceutical biotechnology, pharmacology, toxicology and clinical pharmacy.
期刊最新文献
Safety assessment of hydro-ethanolic extract of Falcaria vulgaris in Wistar rats: Acute and subchronic toxicities Amalgam of ternary solid dispersion and P-gp efflux inhibition in development of colon-targeted tablets of rifaximin Does resveratrol enhance recovery from acute ischemic stroke? A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial Growth inhibitory activity of Brassica oleracea var. Alboglabra on human gastric cancer cells 3D printing in capsule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1