南苏拉威西岛缺失的沉积物:更新世/全新世考古过渡的新证据来源

Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ara.2022.100408
Kim Newman , Budianto Hakim , Adhi Agus Oktaviana , Basran Burhan , David McGahan , Adam Brumm
{"title":"南苏拉威西岛缺失的沉积物:更新世/全新世考古过渡的新证据来源","authors":"Kim Newman ,&nbsp;Budianto Hakim ,&nbsp;Adhi Agus Oktaviana ,&nbsp;Basran Burhan ,&nbsp;David McGahan ,&nbsp;Adam Brumm","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2022.100408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The Indonesian island of Sulawesi, located in the ‘Wallacean’ biogeographical zone at the axis of </span>human migration<span><span> between the super-continents of Sunda and Sahul, has been linked to many research questions relating to the early movements of humans in the region between the landmasses of Asia and Australia. From an archaeological perspective, South Sulawesi is one of the most intensively investigated parts of Indonesia, although much about the early human story in this region remains unknown. While Pleistocene<span> assemblages are scarce, South Sulawesi contains sites with deposits &gt;50,000 years old, along with rock art of a broadly similar antiquity. Mid-Holocene assemblages reveal a regionally unique technocomplex known as the Toalean. However, knowledge of how these two cultural periods are related has been obscured by a gap in the archaeological record between c.20,000–10,000 years ago. This gap has prevented us from understanding the origins of major developments in stone tool technologies, environmental adaptations, and changes in material culture. Cemented archaeological deposits adhering to cave walls, known as breccias, may prove the solution for researchers interested in these poorly understood time periods. Samples taken from archaeological breccias for radiocarbon dating have shown that the deposits currently missing from the archaeological record can still be found attached to cave walls. These breccias contain archaeological deposits that have been consolidated by </span></span>calcite<span> precipitation and have remained attached to the walls of caves and rockshelters, while the majority of uncemented deposits were removed from the site by erosion or physical action. The identification of these ‘time capsules’ affirms environmental conditions did not restrict nor prevent occupation or site formation in South Sulawesi during the early Holocene period, and confirms archaeological breccias are a valid source of archaeological data and should be examined to a greater extent in the future. This paper identifies these missing archaeological deposits by dating material from archaeological breccias at the site, Leang Bulu Bettue, in the Maros Regency of South Sulawesi. It suggests that archaeological breccias are a valid and important source of information for consideration in future research.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The missing deposits of South Sulawesi: New sources of evidence for the Pleistocene/Holocene archaeological transition\",\"authors\":\"Kim Newman ,&nbsp;Budianto Hakim ,&nbsp;Adhi Agus Oktaviana ,&nbsp;Basran Burhan ,&nbsp;David McGahan ,&nbsp;Adam Brumm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ara.2022.100408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>The Indonesian island of Sulawesi, located in the ‘Wallacean’ biogeographical zone at the axis of </span>human migration<span><span> between the super-continents of Sunda and Sahul, has been linked to many research questions relating to the early movements of humans in the region between the landmasses of Asia and Australia. From an archaeological perspective, South Sulawesi is one of the most intensively investigated parts of Indonesia, although much about the early human story in this region remains unknown. While Pleistocene<span> assemblages are scarce, South Sulawesi contains sites with deposits &gt;50,000 years old, along with rock art of a broadly similar antiquity. Mid-Holocene assemblages reveal a regionally unique technocomplex known as the Toalean. However, knowledge of how these two cultural periods are related has been obscured by a gap in the archaeological record between c.20,000–10,000 years ago. This gap has prevented us from understanding the origins of major developments in stone tool technologies, environmental adaptations, and changes in material culture. Cemented archaeological deposits adhering to cave walls, known as breccias, may prove the solution for researchers interested in these poorly understood time periods. Samples taken from archaeological breccias for radiocarbon dating have shown that the deposits currently missing from the archaeological record can still be found attached to cave walls. These breccias contain archaeological deposits that have been consolidated by </span></span>calcite<span> precipitation and have remained attached to the walls of caves and rockshelters, while the majority of uncemented deposits were removed from the site by erosion or physical action. The identification of these ‘time capsules’ affirms environmental conditions did not restrict nor prevent occupation or site formation in South Sulawesi during the early Holocene period, and confirms archaeological breccias are a valid source of archaeological data and should be examined to a greater extent in the future. This paper identifies these missing archaeological deposits by dating material from archaeological breccias at the site, Leang Bulu Bettue, in the Maros Regency of South Sulawesi. It suggests that archaeological breccias are a valid and important source of information for consideration in future research.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226722000599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226722000599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

印度尼西亚的苏拉威西岛位于巽他和萨胡尔这两个超级大陆之间人类迁徙轴线上的“瓦拉西亚”生物地理地带,它与许多有关人类在亚洲和澳大利亚大陆之间地区早期迁徙的研究问题有关。从考古学的角度来看,南苏拉威西岛是印度尼西亚被调查最多的地区之一,尽管这个地区的早期人类故事仍然未知。虽然更新世的组合很少,但南苏拉威西岛有5万年的矿床,以及大致相似的古代岩石艺术。中全新世的组合揭示了一个区域独特的技术综合体,称为托勒世。然而,关于这两个文化时期之间的关系的知识,由于大约2万到1万年前的考古记录的空白而变得模糊不清。这一差距使我们无法理解石器技术、环境适应和物质文化变化的主要发展的起源。粘在洞穴壁上的考古沉积物被称为角砾岩,可能会为研究这些鲜为人知的时期的研究人员提供解决方案。从考古角砾岩中采集的放射性碳定年样本表明,目前在考古记录中缺失的沉积物仍然可以在洞穴壁上找到。这些角砾岩含有考古沉积物,这些沉积物被方解石沉淀巩固,并一直附着在洞穴和岩石避难所的墙壁上,而大多数未胶结的沉积物因侵蚀或物理作用而从现场移走。这些“时间胶囊”的发现证实了环境条件并没有限制或阻止全新世早期南苏拉威西岛的占领或遗址形成,并证实了考古角砾岩是考古数据的有效来源,应该在未来进行更大程度的研究。本文通过在南苏拉威西岛马洛斯摄摄区的Leang Bulu Bettue遗址的考古角砾岩中发现的材料确定了这些失踪的考古沉积物的年代。这表明,考古角砾岩是一个有效的、重要的信息来源,可供今后的研究参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
The missing deposits of South Sulawesi: New sources of evidence for the Pleistocene/Holocene archaeological transition

The Indonesian island of Sulawesi, located in the ‘Wallacean’ biogeographical zone at the axis of human migration between the super-continents of Sunda and Sahul, has been linked to many research questions relating to the early movements of humans in the region between the landmasses of Asia and Australia. From an archaeological perspective, South Sulawesi is one of the most intensively investigated parts of Indonesia, although much about the early human story in this region remains unknown. While Pleistocene assemblages are scarce, South Sulawesi contains sites with deposits >50,000 years old, along with rock art of a broadly similar antiquity. Mid-Holocene assemblages reveal a regionally unique technocomplex known as the Toalean. However, knowledge of how these two cultural periods are related has been obscured by a gap in the archaeological record between c.20,000–10,000 years ago. This gap has prevented us from understanding the origins of major developments in stone tool technologies, environmental adaptations, and changes in material culture. Cemented archaeological deposits adhering to cave walls, known as breccias, may prove the solution for researchers interested in these poorly understood time periods. Samples taken from archaeological breccias for radiocarbon dating have shown that the deposits currently missing from the archaeological record can still be found attached to cave walls. These breccias contain archaeological deposits that have been consolidated by calcite precipitation and have remained attached to the walls of caves and rockshelters, while the majority of uncemented deposits were removed from the site by erosion or physical action. The identification of these ‘time capsules’ affirms environmental conditions did not restrict nor prevent occupation or site formation in South Sulawesi during the early Holocene period, and confirms archaeological breccias are a valid source of archaeological data and should be examined to a greater extent in the future. This paper identifies these missing archaeological deposits by dating material from archaeological breccias at the site, Leang Bulu Bettue, in the Maros Regency of South Sulawesi. It suggests that archaeological breccias are a valid and important source of information for consideration in future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1