日本的系列电影制作:介绍

IF 0.6 Q2 AREA STUDIES Japan Forum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/09555803.2022.2160479
R. Denison, C. Verevis
{"title":"日本的系列电影制作:介绍","authors":"R. Denison, C. Verevis","doi":"10.1080/09555803.2022.2160479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years an expanding field of academic enquiry has centred upon issues of serial film and media production and formats (including: Forrest 2010; Herbert 2017; Herbert and Verevis 2020; Henderson 2014; Hudelet and Cr emieux 2020; Jess-Cooke 2009; Jess-Cooke and Verevis 2010; Johnson 2013; Kelleter 2017a; Klein and Palmer 2016; Kramer and Rudiger 2015; Krutnik and Loock 2017; Loock and Verevis 2012; Perkins and Verevis 2012; Smith and Verevis 2017; Verevis 2006; Verevis 2017). In the main, this work has been focused on either Hollywood cinema, or on the transnational and transcultural facets of remaking and adaptation flowing from and to Hollywood. This special issue – ‘Serial Filmmaking in Japan’ – seeks to demonstrate how Japan might usefully become the focus for a recentring of these debates (Iwabuchi 2002). We use Japan as a representative of the many nations that have their own histories, traditions and cultures of serialisation. As the articles in this issue demonstrate, film production in Japan provides an especially productive example with a wide range of industrial structures that encourage adaptations, remakes, series and other serial formats. Moreover, like extant work in the field of seriality studies, these essays seek to emphasise the possibility of serialisation as both an industrial and an aesthetic principle, at once showing ‘the dependency of culture on serial reproduction’ (Kelleter 2017b, 14), and tracing how various formatting practices ‘[do] not simply follow an original but [recognise] new versions as free adaptations or variations that actualise an implicit potentiality at the source’ (Verevis 2017, 149). Taking up this type of approach to explore some examples of Japan’s serial film worlds, this special issue demonstrates the ways in which serial media formats are","PeriodicalId":44495,"journal":{"name":"Japan Forum","volume":"35 1","pages":"1 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serial Filmmaking in Japan: Introduction\",\"authors\":\"R. Denison, C. Verevis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09555803.2022.2160479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years an expanding field of academic enquiry has centred upon issues of serial film and media production and formats (including: Forrest 2010; Herbert 2017; Herbert and Verevis 2020; Henderson 2014; Hudelet and Cr emieux 2020; Jess-Cooke 2009; Jess-Cooke and Verevis 2010; Johnson 2013; Kelleter 2017a; Klein and Palmer 2016; Kramer and Rudiger 2015; Krutnik and Loock 2017; Loock and Verevis 2012; Perkins and Verevis 2012; Smith and Verevis 2017; Verevis 2006; Verevis 2017). In the main, this work has been focused on either Hollywood cinema, or on the transnational and transcultural facets of remaking and adaptation flowing from and to Hollywood. This special issue – ‘Serial Filmmaking in Japan’ – seeks to demonstrate how Japan might usefully become the focus for a recentring of these debates (Iwabuchi 2002). We use Japan as a representative of the many nations that have their own histories, traditions and cultures of serialisation. As the articles in this issue demonstrate, film production in Japan provides an especially productive example with a wide range of industrial structures that encourage adaptations, remakes, series and other serial formats. Moreover, like extant work in the field of seriality studies, these essays seek to emphasise the possibility of serialisation as both an industrial and an aesthetic principle, at once showing ‘the dependency of culture on serial reproduction’ (Kelleter 2017b, 14), and tracing how various formatting practices ‘[do] not simply follow an original but [recognise] new versions as free adaptations or variations that actualise an implicit potentiality at the source’ (Verevis 2017, 149). Taking up this type of approach to explore some examples of Japan’s serial film worlds, this special issue demonstrates the ways in which serial media formats are\",\"PeriodicalId\":44495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japan Forum\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japan Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2022.2160479\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2022.2160479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,一个不断扩大的学术研究领域集中在系列电影和媒体制作和格式问题上(包括:Forrest 2010;Herbert 2017;Herbert and Verevis 2020;Henderson 2014;Hudelet and Cr emieux 2020;Jess Cooke 2009;Jess库克和Verevis 2010;Johnson 2013;Kelleter 2017a;Klein和Palmer 2016;Kramer和Rudiger 2015;Krutnik和Loock 2017;Loock和Vereviss 2012;Perkins和Vereviis 2012;Smith和Verevius 2017;Verevis 2006;Vereviis 2017)。总的来说,这部作品要么关注好莱坞电影,要么关注从好莱坞到好莱坞的翻拍和改编的跨国和跨文化方面。这期特刊——“日本的系列电影制作”——试图展示日本如何成为这些争论的焦点(岩部彻,2002年)。我们用日本作为许多国家的代表,这些国家有自己的历史、传统和文化。正如本期文章所展示的那样,日本的电影制作提供了一个特别富有成效的例子,其产业结构广泛,鼓励改编、翻拍、系列和其他系列形式。此外,与连载研究领域的现有工作一样,这些文章试图强调连载作为一种工业原则和美学原则的可能性,同时显示出“文化对连载复制的依赖”(Kelleter 2017b,14),以及追踪各种格式化实践如何“[不]简单地遵循原始版本,而是[认识到]新版本是自由改编或变体,在源头上实现隐含的潜力”(Verevis 2017149)。采用这种方法来探索日本系列电影世界的一些例子,本期特刊展示了系列媒体格式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Serial Filmmaking in Japan: Introduction
In recent years an expanding field of academic enquiry has centred upon issues of serial film and media production and formats (including: Forrest 2010; Herbert 2017; Herbert and Verevis 2020; Henderson 2014; Hudelet and Cr emieux 2020; Jess-Cooke 2009; Jess-Cooke and Verevis 2010; Johnson 2013; Kelleter 2017a; Klein and Palmer 2016; Kramer and Rudiger 2015; Krutnik and Loock 2017; Loock and Verevis 2012; Perkins and Verevis 2012; Smith and Verevis 2017; Verevis 2006; Verevis 2017). In the main, this work has been focused on either Hollywood cinema, or on the transnational and transcultural facets of remaking and adaptation flowing from and to Hollywood. This special issue – ‘Serial Filmmaking in Japan’ – seeks to demonstrate how Japan might usefully become the focus for a recentring of these debates (Iwabuchi 2002). We use Japan as a representative of the many nations that have their own histories, traditions and cultures of serialisation. As the articles in this issue demonstrate, film production in Japan provides an especially productive example with a wide range of industrial structures that encourage adaptations, remakes, series and other serial formats. Moreover, like extant work in the field of seriality studies, these essays seek to emphasise the possibility of serialisation as both an industrial and an aesthetic principle, at once showing ‘the dependency of culture on serial reproduction’ (Kelleter 2017b, 14), and tracing how various formatting practices ‘[do] not simply follow an original but [recognise] new versions as free adaptations or variations that actualise an implicit potentiality at the source’ (Verevis 2017, 149). Taking up this type of approach to explore some examples of Japan’s serial film worlds, this special issue demonstrates the ways in which serial media formats are
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japan Forum
Japan Forum AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Hey! Say Ishin: Ōmae Ken’ichi’s and Hashimoto Tōru’s policy entrepreneurship and the neoliberal reorientation of contemporary Ishin politics Shakaijin, shadow education, & the entrepreneurial self: fabricating personhood in neoliberal Japan Eight Dogs, or Hakkenden, Part Two—His Master’s Blade The Work of Gender: Service, Performance and Fantasy in Contemporary Japan Tokyo Jazz Joints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1