威廉·金对古人类学早期发展的贡献

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences Irish Journal of Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3318/IJES.2015.33.1
J. Murray, H. Nasheuer, C. Seoighe, G. McCormack, D. M. Williams, D. Harper
{"title":"威廉·金对古人类学早期发展的贡献","authors":"J. Murray, H. Nasheuer, C. Seoighe, G. McCormack, D. M. Williams, D. Harper","doi":"10.3318/IJES.2015.33.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:AbstractThe study of human evolution began in earnest with the discovery of fossil human remains in a cave in the Neander Valley of Germany in 1856. William King (1809–1886), Professor of Geology and Mineralogy at Queen's College Galway, as NUI Galway was then known, obtained a plaster replica of the skullcap and, following careful examination, proposed the name Homo neanderthalensis for the specimen at the 1863 meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. This suggestion was both extraordinary and revolutionary for its time. To his lasting credit, William King remains the first scientist to name a new and extinct species of human based on actual fossil hominin material. King's proposal effectively marked the beginning of one of the longest standing debates in human evolutionary studies—the precise taxonomic and phylogenetic position of Neanderthals. Opinion remains divided as to whether they should be given specific (sensu King) or subspecific status, and studies of Neanderthal ancient DNA have further fuelled this debate. Palaeoanthropology as a scientific discipline began with the acceptance that different species of human had existed in the past and King made a singular contribution to that development.","PeriodicalId":35911,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Earth Sciences","volume":"33 1","pages":"1 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3318/IJES.2015.33.1","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Contribution of William King to the Early Development of Palaeoanthropology\",\"authors\":\"J. Murray, H. Nasheuer, C. Seoighe, G. McCormack, D. M. Williams, D. Harper\",\"doi\":\"10.3318/IJES.2015.33.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:AbstractThe study of human evolution began in earnest with the discovery of fossil human remains in a cave in the Neander Valley of Germany in 1856. William King (1809–1886), Professor of Geology and Mineralogy at Queen's College Galway, as NUI Galway was then known, obtained a plaster replica of the skullcap and, following careful examination, proposed the name Homo neanderthalensis for the specimen at the 1863 meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. This suggestion was both extraordinary and revolutionary for its time. To his lasting credit, William King remains the first scientist to name a new and extinct species of human based on actual fossil hominin material. King's proposal effectively marked the beginning of one of the longest standing debates in human evolutionary studies—the precise taxonomic and phylogenetic position of Neanderthals. Opinion remains divided as to whether they should be given specific (sensu King) or subspecific status, and studies of Neanderthal ancient DNA have further fuelled this debate. Palaeoanthropology as a scientific discipline began with the acceptance that different species of human had existed in the past and King made a singular contribution to that development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3318/IJES.2015.33.1\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3318/IJES.2015.33.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3318/IJES.2015.33.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要:人类进化的研究始于1856年在德国尼安德河谷的一个洞穴中发现的人类遗骸化石。威廉·金(1809-1886),戈尔韦女王学院地质学和矿物学教授,也就是当时的NUI戈尔韦,获得了一个头骨的石膏复制品,经过仔细检查,在1863年的英国科学促进会会议上为该标本命名为尼安德特人。这一建议在当时既是非同寻常的,也是革命性的。值得称赞的是,威廉·金仍然是第一位根据原始人化石材料命名新的和已灭绝的人类物种的科学家。金的提议实际上标志着人类进化研究中持续时间最长的争论之一的开始——尼安德特人的确切分类和系统发育位置。对于他们是否应该被赋予特定的(感性国王)或亚种地位,意见仍然存在分歧,对尼安德特人古代DNA的研究进一步推动了这场争论。古人类学作为一门科学学科,始于人们接受过去存在过不同种类的人类,而金对这一发展做出了独特的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Contribution of William King to the Early Development of Palaeoanthropology
Abstract:AbstractThe study of human evolution began in earnest with the discovery of fossil human remains in a cave in the Neander Valley of Germany in 1856. William King (1809–1886), Professor of Geology and Mineralogy at Queen's College Galway, as NUI Galway was then known, obtained a plaster replica of the skullcap and, following careful examination, proposed the name Homo neanderthalensis for the specimen at the 1863 meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. This suggestion was both extraordinary and revolutionary for its time. To his lasting credit, William King remains the first scientist to name a new and extinct species of human based on actual fossil hominin material. King's proposal effectively marked the beginning of one of the longest standing debates in human evolutionary studies—the precise taxonomic and phylogenetic position of Neanderthals. Opinion remains divided as to whether they should be given specific (sensu King) or subspecific status, and studies of Neanderthal ancient DNA have further fuelled this debate. Palaeoanthropology as a scientific discipline began with the acceptance that different species of human had existed in the past and King made a singular contribution to that development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Earth Sciences
Irish Journal of Earth Sciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
The Distribution and Engineering Properties of Interglacial Deposits in Cork City and Harbour The Impact of Topography and Rotation in Shaping the Basin-Scale Circulation in Lough Corrib, Ireland, Under Homogenous Conditions Deposition in the Northwest Porcupine Basin During the Cretaceous New Light on the Oughterard Granite: Connemara’s S-Type Granite, Ireland New Data on the Ben Levy Anticline, With Reverse Reactivation on the Coolin Fault Giving Up-Side-Down Silurian Rocks in Joyces Country, Connemara
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1