Khafifatul Fian, M. Munawir
{"title":"KOMPARASI KEHUJJAHAN HADITS DHA’IF PERSPEKTIF IMAM ABU HANIFAH DAN IMAM AHMAD BIN HANBAL","authors":"Khafifatul Fian, M. Munawir","doi":"10.52431/tafaqquh.v11i1.1169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explain the hadith dha'if by comparing the thoughts of Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal. The type of research used is a literature review through data collection techniques by tracing sources either from articles, books, or other sources relevant to the topic of discussion. After the data is collected, the researchers descriptively analyze and the next step is to conclude. The results showed that on the thought of Imam Abu Hanifah related to the hadith dha'if it is permissible to practice it for something related to the practice or law of sharia and with the provision that the level is not very weak and there are no other postulates that have conflicts with the hadith. Meanwhile, according to Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, it is the same as his thought that Imam Abu Hanifah to allow for the use of hadith dha'if with provisions on discussions related to Practice but not something that discusses the law.","PeriodicalId":31825,"journal":{"name":"Tafaqquh Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Keislaman","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tafaqquh Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Keislaman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52431/tafaqquh.v11i1.1169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过比较伊玛目阿布·哈尼法和伊玛目艾哈迈德·本·汉巴尔的思想来解释圣训。所使用的研究类型是通过数据收集技术进行的文献综述,通过追踪与讨论主题相关的文章、书籍或其他来源。数据收集后,研究人员进行描述性分析,下一步是得出结论。结果表明,根据伊玛目阿布·哈尼法与圣训有关的思想,如果允许为与伊斯兰教法的实践或法律有关的事情实践它,并且规定水平不是很弱,并且没有其他与圣训相冲突的假设。与此同时,根据伊玛目Ahmad bin Hanbal的说法,这与他的想法相同,伊玛目Abu Hanifah允许使用圣训dha’if,其中规定了与实践有关的讨论,而不是讨论法律的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KOMPARASI KEHUJJAHAN HADITS DHA’IF PERSPEKTIF IMAM ABU HANIFAH DAN IMAM AHMAD BIN HANBAL
This study aims to explain the hadith dha'if by comparing the thoughts of Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal. The type of research used is a literature review through data collection techniques by tracing sources either from articles, books, or other sources relevant to the topic of discussion. After the data is collected, the researchers descriptively analyze and the next step is to conclude. The results showed that on the thought of Imam Abu Hanifah related to the hadith dha'if it is permissible to practice it for something related to the practice or law of sharia and with the provision that the level is not very weak and there are no other postulates that have conflicts with the hadith. Meanwhile, according to Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, it is the same as his thought that Imam Abu Hanifah to allow for the use of hadith dha'if with provisions on discussions related to Practice but not something that discusses the law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
EFISIENSI PEMBERIAN PAKAN PADA USAHA PEMBESARAN UDANG VANAME (Litopenaeus vannamei) POLA TAMBAK INTENSIF PUSAT UNGGULAN TEKNOLOGI (PUT) POLITEKNIK NEGERI PONTIANAK DI MEMPAWAH EFEKTIVITAS EKSTRAK BIJI PEPAYA (Carica papaya) TERHADAP KESEMBUHAN DAN KELANGSUNGAN HIDUP IKAN JELAWAT (Leptobarbus hoevenii) YANG DIINFEKSI BAKTERI Aeromonas hydrophila ARTIKEL REVIEW: TEKNIK PEMBENIHAN UDANG GALAH (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) DENGAN METODE PEMIJAHAN ALAMI PERSENTASE JANTAN IKAN NILA (Oreochromis niloticus) HASIL PERENDAMAN DENGAN EKSTRAK DAUN SENGGANI (Melastoma candidum) DOSIS BERBEDA TEKNIK BUDIDAYA IKAN ARWANA SUPER RED Scleropages formosus UNTUK MENGHASILKAN BENIH SIAP TEBAR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1