1-2-3-4 !衡量现场音乐的价值:方法、模式和动机

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS Arts and the Market Pub Date : 2021-02-26 DOI:10.1108/AAM-09-2020-0041
Arno van der Hoeven, Adam Behr, C. Hamilton, M. Mulder, Patrycja Rozbicka
{"title":"1-2-3-4 !衡量现场音乐的价值:方法、模式和动机","authors":"Arno van der Hoeven, Adam Behr, C. Hamilton, M. Mulder, Patrycja Rozbicka","doi":"10.1108/AAM-09-2020-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper sets out to compare different methodologies for measuring the value(s) of live popular music and to explore the different motivations amongst a range of organisations engaged in that work.Design/methodology/approachThe authors analyse how the values of live music are measured, who does it and why. Based on this analysis the authors present a model that visualises the myriad of organisations, methods, aims and objectives involved.FindingsThe authors identify three approaches to measuring the impact of live music (economic impact studies, mapping and censuses and social sciences and humanities) and three types of actors (industry, policy and academia). The analysis of these demonstrates that measuring live music is not a neutral activity, but itself constructs a vision on how live music ecologies functionPractical implicationsFor cultural organisations, demonstrating the outcomes of their work is important in acquiring various forms of support. The model presented in this paper helps them to select adequate methodologies and to reflect on the consequences of particular approaches to measuring live music activities.Originality/valueWhile the number of studies measuring live music's impact is growing, theoretical and methodological reflection on these activities is missing. The authors compare the different methodologies by discussing strengths and weaknesses. This results in a model that identifies gaps in existing studies and explores new directions for future live music research. It enhances understanding of how different ways of measuring live music affect policymaking and conceptions of what live music is and should be.","PeriodicalId":42080,"journal":{"name":"Arts and the Market","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1-2-3-4! Measuring the values of live music: methods, models and motivations\",\"authors\":\"Arno van der Hoeven, Adam Behr, C. Hamilton, M. Mulder, Patrycja Rozbicka\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/AAM-09-2020-0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper sets out to compare different methodologies for measuring the value(s) of live popular music and to explore the different motivations amongst a range of organisations engaged in that work.Design/methodology/approachThe authors analyse how the values of live music are measured, who does it and why. Based on this analysis the authors present a model that visualises the myriad of organisations, methods, aims and objectives involved.FindingsThe authors identify three approaches to measuring the impact of live music (economic impact studies, mapping and censuses and social sciences and humanities) and three types of actors (industry, policy and academia). The analysis of these demonstrates that measuring live music is not a neutral activity, but itself constructs a vision on how live music ecologies functionPractical implicationsFor cultural organisations, demonstrating the outcomes of their work is important in acquiring various forms of support. The model presented in this paper helps them to select adequate methodologies and to reflect on the consequences of particular approaches to measuring live music activities.Originality/valueWhile the number of studies measuring live music's impact is growing, theoretical and methodological reflection on these activities is missing. The authors compare the different methodologies by discussing strengths and weaknesses. This results in a model that identifies gaps in existing studies and explores new directions for future live music research. It enhances understanding of how different ways of measuring live music affect policymaking and conceptions of what live music is and should be.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts and the Market\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts and the Market\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/AAM-09-2020-0041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts and the Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/AAM-09-2020-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在比较衡量现场流行音乐价值的不同方法,并探讨从事这项工作的一系列组织之间的不同动机。设计/方法/方法作者分析了现场音乐的价值是如何衡量的,是谁做的,为什么。基于这一分析,作者提出了一个模型,将所涉及的无数组织、方法、目的和目标可视化。作者确定了三种衡量现场音乐影响的方法(经济影响研究、地图绘制和人口普查、社会科学和人文科学)和三种类型的参与者(行业、政策和学术界)。这些分析表明,测量现场音乐不是一个中立的活动,而是它本身构建了一个关于现场音乐生态如何发挥作用的愿景。实际意义对于文化组织来说,展示他们的工作成果对于获得各种形式的支持很重要。本文中提出的模型帮助他们选择适当的方法,并反思测量现场音乐活动的特定方法的后果。原创性/价值虽然衡量现场音乐影响的研究越来越多,但对这些活动的理论和方法反思却缺失。作者通过讨论优缺点来比较不同的方法。这就产生了一个模型,可以识别现有研究中的差距,并为未来的现场音乐研究探索新的方向。它增强了对衡量现场音乐的不同方法如何影响政策制定和现场音乐是什么以及应该是什么的概念的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1-2-3-4! Measuring the values of live music: methods, models and motivations
PurposeThis paper sets out to compare different methodologies for measuring the value(s) of live popular music and to explore the different motivations amongst a range of organisations engaged in that work.Design/methodology/approachThe authors analyse how the values of live music are measured, who does it and why. Based on this analysis the authors present a model that visualises the myriad of organisations, methods, aims and objectives involved.FindingsThe authors identify three approaches to measuring the impact of live music (economic impact studies, mapping and censuses and social sciences and humanities) and three types of actors (industry, policy and academia). The analysis of these demonstrates that measuring live music is not a neutral activity, but itself constructs a vision on how live music ecologies functionPractical implicationsFor cultural organisations, demonstrating the outcomes of their work is important in acquiring various forms of support. The model presented in this paper helps them to select adequate methodologies and to reflect on the consequences of particular approaches to measuring live music activities.Originality/valueWhile the number of studies measuring live music's impact is growing, theoretical and methodological reflection on these activities is missing. The authors compare the different methodologies by discussing strengths and weaknesses. This results in a model that identifies gaps in existing studies and explores new directions for future live music research. It enhances understanding of how different ways of measuring live music affect policymaking and conceptions of what live music is and should be.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Influence of movie-related online consumer reviews on movie choice: are there generational differences in processing information cues? Dance consumption and mood changes: Examining the role of gender and generational cohorts Participant-oriented evaluation through participatory action research: a case study of a community engagement approach Reading relationally: a proposal for relational-comparative research concerning city/capital of culture events Towards an “Evaluation Dilemmas Model” – designing an evaluation scheme for a European capital of culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1