动机操纵与神经反馈方法对注意缺陷/多动障碍儿童奖励敏感性、延迟折扣和冲动性的影响比较

Siyamak Tahmasebi Garmtani, Alireza Karimpour Vazifehkhorani
{"title":"动机操纵与神经反馈方法对注意缺陷/多动障碍儿童奖励敏感性、延迟折扣和冲动性的影响比较","authors":"Siyamak Tahmasebi Garmtani, Alireza Karimpour Vazifehkhorani","doi":"10.32598/IJPCP.27.4.3572.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose; The aim of this study was to comparison of the effectiveness of two methods of motivational manipulation and neurofeedback on sensitivity to reward, delay discounting and impulsivity in children with attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder. Methods; The present study was an experimental study with pre-test, post-test, follow-up and control group. The study population consisted of children aged 7 to 12 years with ADHD. Available sampling method was used for sampling in this study. Sample size was selected based on the purpose and method of research (in experimental research, the sample size of at least 30 people in each group is recommended) 90 people. In this study, neurofeedback and motivational manipulation were performed on the intervention group as an intervention, each session was performed for 12 sessions and each session was performed for 45 minutes. Balloon risk test and delay discounting test were used to collect data in pre-test, post-test and follow-up stages and the data were analyzed using MANCOVA statistical method in SPSS-23. Results; By controlling the effects of pretest on posttest, the difference between the groups in the posttest was statistically significant between the variables of impulsivity and delay at the level of P <0.01 and between the variables of reward sensitivity at the level of P <0.05. The results also showed that neurofeedback method (M = 4.66) had a greater effect on reward processing than motivational manipulation method (M = 2.31) compared to the control group, which was significant at the level of P <0.01. But the difference between the mean of motivational manipulation (M = 2.31) in comparison with the control group was not significant. Conclusion; Voluntary activation of dopaminergic regions of the brain by neurofeedback and motivational manipulation leads to endogenous dopamine control in these structures, leading to successful regulation or inhibitory control and reduced cravings, which reduces impulsivity, delay discounting, and sensitivity to reward.","PeriodicalId":43609,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Motivational Manipulation and Neurofeedback Methods on Sensitivity to Reward, Delay Discounting and Impulsivity in Children with Attention Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder\",\"authors\":\"Siyamak Tahmasebi Garmtani, Alireza Karimpour Vazifehkhorani\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/IJPCP.27.4.3572.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose; The aim of this study was to comparison of the effectiveness of two methods of motivational manipulation and neurofeedback on sensitivity to reward, delay discounting and impulsivity in children with attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder. Methods; The present study was an experimental study with pre-test, post-test, follow-up and control group. The study population consisted of children aged 7 to 12 years with ADHD. Available sampling method was used for sampling in this study. Sample size was selected based on the purpose and method of research (in experimental research, the sample size of at least 30 people in each group is recommended) 90 people. In this study, neurofeedback and motivational manipulation were performed on the intervention group as an intervention, each session was performed for 12 sessions and each session was performed for 45 minutes. Balloon risk test and delay discounting test were used to collect data in pre-test, post-test and follow-up stages and the data were analyzed using MANCOVA statistical method in SPSS-23. Results; By controlling the effects of pretest on posttest, the difference between the groups in the posttest was statistically significant between the variables of impulsivity and delay at the level of P <0.01 and between the variables of reward sensitivity at the level of P <0.05. The results also showed that neurofeedback method (M = 4.66) had a greater effect on reward processing than motivational manipulation method (M = 2.31) compared to the control group, which was significant at the level of P <0.01. But the difference between the mean of motivational manipulation (M = 2.31) in comparison with the control group was not significant. Conclusion; Voluntary activation of dopaminergic regions of the brain by neurofeedback and motivational manipulation leads to endogenous dopamine control in these structures, leading to successful regulation or inhibitory control and reduced cravings, which reduces impulsivity, delay discounting, and sensitivity to reward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/IJPCP.27.4.3572.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/IJPCP.27.4.3572.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的;本研究的目的是比较动机操纵和神经反馈两种方法对注意缺陷/多动障碍儿童奖励敏感性、延迟折扣和冲动性的影响。方法;本研究为实验研究,分为前测、后测、随访和对照组。研究人群包括7至12岁患有多动症的儿童。本研究采用现有抽样方法进行抽样。样本量根据研究目的和研究方法选择(在实验研究中,建议每组至少30人的样本量)90人。本研究对干预组进行神经反馈和动机操纵作为干预,每组12次,每次45分钟。采用气球风险测试和延迟折现测试收集测试前、测试后和随访阶段的数据,采用SPSS-23中的MANCOVA统计方法对数据进行分析。结果;在控制前测对后测的影响后,冲动性和延迟性变量在P <0.01水平上,奖励敏感性变量在P <0.05水平上,组间后测差异有统计学意义。与对照组相比,神经反馈法(M = 4.66)对奖励加工的影响显著高于动机操纵法(M = 2.31),差异有统计学意义(P <0.01)。但动机操纵的均值(M = 2.31)与对照组比较差异无统计学意义。结论;通过神经反馈和动机操纵,大脑多巴胺能区域的自愿激活导致这些结构中的内源性多巴胺控制,导致成功的调节或抑制控制和减少渴望,从而减少冲动,延迟折扣和对奖励的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Motivational Manipulation and Neurofeedback Methods on Sensitivity to Reward, Delay Discounting and Impulsivity in Children with Attention Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder
Purpose; The aim of this study was to comparison of the effectiveness of two methods of motivational manipulation and neurofeedback on sensitivity to reward, delay discounting and impulsivity in children with attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder. Methods; The present study was an experimental study with pre-test, post-test, follow-up and control group. The study population consisted of children aged 7 to 12 years with ADHD. Available sampling method was used for sampling in this study. Sample size was selected based on the purpose and method of research (in experimental research, the sample size of at least 30 people in each group is recommended) 90 people. In this study, neurofeedback and motivational manipulation were performed on the intervention group as an intervention, each session was performed for 12 sessions and each session was performed for 45 minutes. Balloon risk test and delay discounting test were used to collect data in pre-test, post-test and follow-up stages and the data were analyzed using MANCOVA statistical method in SPSS-23. Results; By controlling the effects of pretest on posttest, the difference between the groups in the posttest was statistically significant between the variables of impulsivity and delay at the level of P <0.01 and between the variables of reward sensitivity at the level of P <0.05. The results also showed that neurofeedback method (M = 4.66) had a greater effect on reward processing than motivational manipulation method (M = 2.31) compared to the control group, which was significant at the level of P <0.01. But the difference between the mean of motivational manipulation (M = 2.31) in comparison with the control group was not significant. Conclusion; Voluntary activation of dopaminergic regions of the brain by neurofeedback and motivational manipulation leads to endogenous dopamine control in these structures, leading to successful regulation or inhibitory control and reduced cravings, which reduces impulsivity, delay discounting, and sensitivity to reward.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
22.20%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Alzheimer’s disease: is there a way out of the deaf corner? Psychoanalysis and evidence-based practice in mental health Energy for treating trauma/PTSD Professional Quality of Life, Empathy, and Coping Strategies of Young Clinical Psychologists in Lahore, Pakistan Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Craving and Problematic Pornography Use in Young Men: A Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1