金融公司的高级管理人员和认证制度:组织文化分析

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of Corporate Law Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14735970.2022.2054165
A. Keller, A. Kokkinis
{"title":"金融公司的高级管理人员和认证制度:组织文化分析","authors":"A. Keller, A. Kokkinis","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2022.2054165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article critically interrogates the experience of the implementation and enforcement of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR) in light of interdisciplinary literature on organisational culture. We demonstrate that the SMCR brings the promise of enhancing effective regulatory supervision of firm culture, supporting the incipient professionalisation of senior manager functions in the financial sector and discerning tangible aspects of artefacts and behaviours that constitute the external layer of good culture. However, we argue that, apart from the more obvious risk of too little enforcement or enforcement targeted at misconduct in the private sphere, there is a risk that a perception of rigidity in enforcement may lead to the development of a counterproductive culture, especially if firms unduly rely upon tick-box quantitative measurement approaches to culture management, and that sound culture may be simplistically equated to compliance with the SMCR. This necessitates a careful and nuanced approach to supervision.","PeriodicalId":44517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"299 - 334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The senior managers and certification regime in financial firms: an organisational culture analysis\",\"authors\":\"A. Keller, A. Kokkinis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14735970.2022.2054165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article critically interrogates the experience of the implementation and enforcement of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR) in light of interdisciplinary literature on organisational culture. We demonstrate that the SMCR brings the promise of enhancing effective regulatory supervision of firm culture, supporting the incipient professionalisation of senior manager functions in the financial sector and discerning tangible aspects of artefacts and behaviours that constitute the external layer of good culture. However, we argue that, apart from the more obvious risk of too little enforcement or enforcement targeted at misconduct in the private sphere, there is a risk that a perception of rigidity in enforcement may lead to the development of a counterproductive culture, especially if firms unduly rely upon tick-box quantitative measurement approaches to culture management, and that sound culture may be simplistically equated to compliance with the SMCR. This necessitates a careful and nuanced approach to supervision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"299 - 334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2022.2054165\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2022.2054165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文根据跨学科的组织文化文献,批判性地探讨了高级管理人员和认证制度(SMCR)的实施和执行经验。我们证明,SMCR有望加强对企业文化的有效监管,支持金融部门高级管理人员职能的初步专业化,并识别构成良好文化外部层面的人工制品和行为的有形方面。然而,我们认为,除了执法力度过少或针对私人领域不当行为的执法的更明显的风险之外,还有一种风险是,执法中僵化的观念可能会导致适得其反的文化的发展,特别是如果公司过度依赖于文化管理的复选框定量测量方法,并且健全的文化可能被简单地等同于遵守SMCR。这就需要一种细致入微的监管方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The senior managers and certification regime in financial firms: an organisational culture analysis
ABSTRACT This article critically interrogates the experience of the implementation and enforcement of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR) in light of interdisciplinary literature on organisational culture. We demonstrate that the SMCR brings the promise of enhancing effective regulatory supervision of firm culture, supporting the incipient professionalisation of senior manager functions in the financial sector and discerning tangible aspects of artefacts and behaviours that constitute the external layer of good culture. However, we argue that, apart from the more obvious risk of too little enforcement or enforcement targeted at misconduct in the private sphere, there is a risk that a perception of rigidity in enforcement may lead to the development of a counterproductive culture, especially if firms unduly rely upon tick-box quantitative measurement approaches to culture management, and that sound culture may be simplistically equated to compliance with the SMCR. This necessitates a careful and nuanced approach to supervision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The extension of vicarious liability in corporate groups Investor personhood: the case against paternalism and welfarism in corporate law Separate legal personality – an explanation and a defence Directors’ positive duty to act in the interests of the entity: shareholders’ interests bounded by corporate purpose Private credit: a renaissance in corporate finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1