{"title":"内容狭窄,参数泛滥","authors":"Ori Simchen","doi":"10.1111/phib.12237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A centerpiece of Juhani Yli-Vakkuri and John Hawthorne's <i>Narrow Content</i> (OUP 2018) is the parameter proliferation argument. The authors consider a series of cleverly constructed cases of pairs of corresponding thoughts of qualitatively identical twins and argue that divergence in truth value for such thoughts forces the internalist to admit novel alethic parameters for semantic evaluation that are not independently motivated. I argue that the internalist will resist this argument by denying that such pairs of thoughts diverge in truth value. I then argue that the construal of content presupposed by the argument should be rejected or amended by the internalist on independent grounds. I end in a more diagnostic vein by considering why parameter proliferation might have seemed pressing for internalism to begin with.</p>","PeriodicalId":45646,"journal":{"name":"Analytic Philosophy","volume":"63 3","pages":"204-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Narrow content and parameter proliferation\",\"authors\":\"Ori Simchen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/phib.12237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A centerpiece of Juhani Yli-Vakkuri and John Hawthorne's <i>Narrow Content</i> (OUP 2018) is the parameter proliferation argument. The authors consider a series of cleverly constructed cases of pairs of corresponding thoughts of qualitatively identical twins and argue that divergence in truth value for such thoughts forces the internalist to admit novel alethic parameters for semantic evaluation that are not independently motivated. I argue that the internalist will resist this argument by denying that such pairs of thoughts diverge in truth value. I then argue that the construal of content presupposed by the argument should be rejected or amended by the internalist on independent grounds. I end in a more diagnostic vein by considering why parameter proliferation might have seemed pressing for internalism to begin with.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytic Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"63 3\",\"pages\":\"204-212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytic Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phib.12237\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytic Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phib.12237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
Juhani Yli-Vakkuri和John Hawthorne的窄内容(OUP 2018)的核心是参数扩散论点。作者考虑了一系列巧妙构建的对定性同卵双胞胎的相应思想的案例,并认为这些思想的真值分歧迫使内部主义者承认语义评价的新真性参数,这些参数不是独立动机的。我认为,内部主义者会通过否认这种思想对在真理价值上的分歧来抵制这种论点。然后,我认为,由论证预设的内容解释应该被内部主义者以独立的理由拒绝或修正。最后,我将以一种更具诊断性的方式来思考,为什么参数扩散一开始似乎迫切需要内部主义。
A centerpiece of Juhani Yli-Vakkuri and John Hawthorne's Narrow Content (OUP 2018) is the parameter proliferation argument. The authors consider a series of cleverly constructed cases of pairs of corresponding thoughts of qualitatively identical twins and argue that divergence in truth value for such thoughts forces the internalist to admit novel alethic parameters for semantic evaluation that are not independently motivated. I argue that the internalist will resist this argument by denying that such pairs of thoughts diverge in truth value. I then argue that the construal of content presupposed by the argument should be rejected or amended by the internalist on independent grounds. I end in a more diagnostic vein by considering why parameter proliferation might have seemed pressing for internalism to begin with.