Empiriomonism:哲学论文,第1-3卷,亚历山大·博格达诺夫,大卫·G·罗利编辑和翻译。莱顿:布里尔,2020年。

M. Chehonadskih
{"title":"Empiriomonism:哲学论文,第1-3卷,亚历山大·博格达诺夫,大卫·G·罗利编辑和翻译。莱顿:布里尔,2020年。","authors":"M. Chehonadskih","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2022.2026754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The translation of Alexander Bogdanov’s Empiriomonism into English may be considered either belated or well timed. First crafted between 1904 and 1906, its three volumes were produced for and by the revolution in Russia, constituting what may be considered a manifesto of heretical tendencies in Marxism, uniting a generation against Plekhanov’s orthodoxy; a collection of essays; or an ambitious philosophical treatise. Empiriomonism expresses a style of 1905 revolutionary thought but has philosophically outlived the urgencies and contexts of its publication. This review essay examines Bogdanov’s contribution as an attempt to unite empiricism and Marxism, as a theory of technics and of the mutually constituted ideological organization of social forms, and as a relevant philosophical tool for engaging with speculative, political, and ecological issues abandoned by the Marxist canon.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empiriomonism: Essays in Philosophy, Books 1–3, by Alexander Bogdanov, edited and translated by David G. Rowley. Leiden: Brill, 2020.\",\"authors\":\"M. Chehonadskih\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2022.2026754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The translation of Alexander Bogdanov’s Empiriomonism into English may be considered either belated or well timed. First crafted between 1904 and 1906, its three volumes were produced for and by the revolution in Russia, constituting what may be considered a manifesto of heretical tendencies in Marxism, uniting a generation against Plekhanov’s orthodoxy; a collection of essays; or an ambitious philosophical treatise. Empiriomonism expresses a style of 1905 revolutionary thought but has philosophically outlived the urgencies and contexts of its publication. This review essay examines Bogdanov’s contribution as an attempt to unite empiricism and Marxism, as a theory of technics and of the mutually constituted ideological organization of social forms, and as a relevant philosophical tool for engaging with speculative, political, and ecological issues abandoned by the Marxist canon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2026754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2026754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将亚历山大·博格丹诺夫的帝国主义翻译成英语可能被认为是姗姗来迟,也可能是恰逢其时。该书于1904年至1906年首次出版,三卷本是为俄罗斯革命制作的,构成了马克思主义异端倾向的宣言,团结了一代人反对普列汉诺夫的正统观念;散文集;或者是一篇雄心勃勃的哲学论文。Empiriomonish表达了1905年革命思想的风格,但在哲学上已经超越了其出版的紧迫性和背景。这篇综述文章考察了博格丹诺夫的贡献,他试图将经验主义和马克思主义结合起来,将其作为一种技术理论和相互构成的社会形式的意识形态组织,并将其作为处理马克思主义经典所抛弃的思辨、政治和生态问题的相关哲学工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empiriomonism: Essays in Philosophy, Books 1–3, by Alexander Bogdanov, edited and translated by David G. Rowley. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
The translation of Alexander Bogdanov’s Empiriomonism into English may be considered either belated or well timed. First crafted between 1904 and 1906, its three volumes were produced for and by the revolution in Russia, constituting what may be considered a manifesto of heretical tendencies in Marxism, uniting a generation against Plekhanov’s orthodoxy; a collection of essays; or an ambitious philosophical treatise. Empiriomonism expresses a style of 1905 revolutionary thought but has philosophically outlived the urgencies and contexts of its publication. This review essay examines Bogdanov’s contribution as an attempt to unite empiricism and Marxism, as a theory of technics and of the mutually constituted ideological organization of social forms, and as a relevant philosophical tool for engaging with speculative, political, and ecological issues abandoned by the Marxist canon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The Vulgar (in) Marxism: Vacillating between Exchange and Production Toward a Vulgar Transgender Marxism Vulgar, Crude, Foolish: Brecht, Teaching, Fascism Airbrushing Out Revolutionary Social Democracy: Lenin, Stalin, and Potresov on the Second International Editors’ Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1