德国物理治疗师的疼痛:疼痛患病率和止痛药摄入量的分析

IF 0.4 Q4 REHABILITATION Physioscience Pub Date : 2021-08-11 DOI:10.1055/a-1397-6166
Sarah Steiner, L. Möckel
{"title":"德国物理治疗师的疼痛:疼痛患病率和止痛药摄入量的分析","authors":"Sarah Steiner, L. Möckel","doi":"10.1055/a-1397-6166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Healthcare professionals of different occupations report pain, in particular back pain. It is known that the handling of patients and standing for long periods of time – like physiotherapists do, as well as working in bent posture – are causes of back pain. A high prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in German physiotherapists is to be expected. Objective To determine pain point prevalence, severity of pain, type of pain (acute, chronic, recurrent), most affected body locations and extent of analgesics intake in German physiotherapists. Method This was a nationwide online survey with German physiotherapists. Univariable and multivariable methods were applied to identify associations between sociodemographic variables and pain, type of pain and pain location as well as analgesic intake by type of pain. In addition, severity of pain by type was examined using the Kruska-Wallis Test. Results A total of 550 physiotherapists were included in the analysis. Prevalence of pain was 63.09 % (acute: 4.18 %, chronic: 15.27 %, recurrent: 43.64 %). Most frequently mentioned pain locations were lumbar spine (49.27 %), cervical spine (48.39 %) and head (40.47 %). Participants with chronic pain reported a higher pain severity than physiotherapists with recurrent pain. Analgesics were used by 35.29 % of study participants with pain. Participants with chronic pain indicated a significantly higher probability of using analgesics compared to physiotherapists with recurrent pain. Conclusion This study indicates a high prevalence of pain and analgesics intake in participating physiotherapists. Therefore, measures are needed to reduce pain in German physiotherapists.","PeriodicalId":41765,"journal":{"name":"Physioscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain in German physiotherapists: an analysis of pain prevalence and analgesics intake\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Steiner, L. Möckel\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-1397-6166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Healthcare professionals of different occupations report pain, in particular back pain. It is known that the handling of patients and standing for long periods of time – like physiotherapists do, as well as working in bent posture – are causes of back pain. A high prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in German physiotherapists is to be expected. Objective To determine pain point prevalence, severity of pain, type of pain (acute, chronic, recurrent), most affected body locations and extent of analgesics intake in German physiotherapists. Method This was a nationwide online survey with German physiotherapists. Univariable and multivariable methods were applied to identify associations between sociodemographic variables and pain, type of pain and pain location as well as analgesic intake by type of pain. In addition, severity of pain by type was examined using the Kruska-Wallis Test. Results A total of 550 physiotherapists were included in the analysis. Prevalence of pain was 63.09 % (acute: 4.18 %, chronic: 15.27 %, recurrent: 43.64 %). Most frequently mentioned pain locations were lumbar spine (49.27 %), cervical spine (48.39 %) and head (40.47 %). Participants with chronic pain reported a higher pain severity than physiotherapists with recurrent pain. Analgesics were used by 35.29 % of study participants with pain. Participants with chronic pain indicated a significantly higher probability of using analgesics compared to physiotherapists with recurrent pain. Conclusion This study indicates a high prevalence of pain and analgesics intake in participating physiotherapists. Therefore, measures are needed to reduce pain in German physiotherapists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physioscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physioscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1397-6166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physioscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1397-6166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景不同职业的医疗保健专业人员报告疼痛,特别是背部疼痛。众所周知,处理病人和长时间站立——就像物理治疗师所做的那样,以及弯腰工作——都是背部疼痛的原因。高流行的腰痛(LBP)在德国物理治疗师是可以预期的。目的了解德国物理治疗师的痛点患病率、疼痛严重程度、疼痛类型(急性、慢性、复发性)、最受影响的身体部位和镇痛药的摄入程度。方法对德国物理治疗师进行全国性在线调查。采用单变量和多变量方法来确定社会人口学变量与疼痛、疼痛类型和疼痛位置以及疼痛类型的止痛药摄入量之间的关系。此外,使用Kruska-Wallis测试检查不同类型疼痛的严重程度。结果共纳入550名物理治疗师。疼痛发生率为63.09%(急性:4.18%,慢性:15.27%,复发:43.64%)。最常提到的疼痛部位是腰椎(49.27%)、颈椎(48.39%)和头部(40.47%)。慢性疼痛的参与者报告的疼痛严重程度高于复发性疼痛的物理治疗师。35.29%的疼痛患者使用了镇痛药。与复发性疼痛的物理治疗师相比,慢性疼痛的参与者使用镇痛药的可能性明显更高。结论本研究表明,参与治疗的物理治疗师中存在较高的疼痛发生率和止痛药的摄入量。因此,需要采取措施来减轻德国物理治疗师的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pain in German physiotherapists: an analysis of pain prevalence and analgesics intake
Abstract Background Healthcare professionals of different occupations report pain, in particular back pain. It is known that the handling of patients and standing for long periods of time – like physiotherapists do, as well as working in bent posture – are causes of back pain. A high prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in German physiotherapists is to be expected. Objective To determine pain point prevalence, severity of pain, type of pain (acute, chronic, recurrent), most affected body locations and extent of analgesics intake in German physiotherapists. Method This was a nationwide online survey with German physiotherapists. Univariable and multivariable methods were applied to identify associations between sociodemographic variables and pain, type of pain and pain location as well as analgesic intake by type of pain. In addition, severity of pain by type was examined using the Kruska-Wallis Test. Results A total of 550 physiotherapists were included in the analysis. Prevalence of pain was 63.09 % (acute: 4.18 %, chronic: 15.27 %, recurrent: 43.64 %). Most frequently mentioned pain locations were lumbar spine (49.27 %), cervical spine (48.39 %) and head (40.47 %). Participants with chronic pain reported a higher pain severity than physiotherapists with recurrent pain. Analgesics were used by 35.29 % of study participants with pain. Participants with chronic pain indicated a significantly higher probability of using analgesics compared to physiotherapists with recurrent pain. Conclusion This study indicates a high prevalence of pain and analgesics intake in participating physiotherapists. Therefore, measures are needed to reduce pain in German physiotherapists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physioscience
Physioscience REHABILITATION-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Diffusionstheorie in der Physiotherapie – eine qualitative Untersuchung des Innovations-Entscheidungsprozesses bei deutschen Early Adoptern physiokongress 2024 – für jeden etwas dabei Effekt der Dosiskomponenten von Krafttraining zur Behandlung von Tendinopathien: eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit mit Meta-Analyse Die Ergänzung einer strukturierten Lebensstiländerung zum traditionellen Trainingsprogramm zur Behandlung von Patient*innen mit Kniearthrose: eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit und Metaanalyse randomisierter Studien Videotherapie: Gekommen, um zu bleiben?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1