在日常和紧急情况下开展知识管理活动的动机

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Aslib Journal of Information Management Pub Date : 2023-03-30 DOI:10.1108/ajim-10-2022-0458
Maayan Nakash, D. Bouhnik
{"title":"在日常和紧急情况下开展知识管理活动的动机","authors":"Maayan Nakash, D. Bouhnik","doi":"10.1108/ajim-10-2022-0458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research seeks to understand, for the first time, what motivates knowledge-intensive organizations (KIOs) to initiate knowledge management (KM) activities in times of routine and emergency. The COVID-19 pandemic was placed at the center as a case study of an extreme crisis.Design/methodology/approachBased on the adoption of the qualitative-constructivist paradigm, the study was conducted among 52 KM professionals through in-depth interviews and focus groups. The data were analyzed using a thematic analysis method, according to the principles of the grounded theory approach.FindingsThe findings reveal that opportunities and risks are two types of catalysts which accelerate KM efforts in times of routine and emergency respectively. Due to KM’s support of the transition to flexible employment during COVID-19, the authors show that this field experienced real growth and prosperity in the “new normal.” KM initiatives were promoted during the COVID-19 crisis in light of gaps in retention, sharing, accessibility and development of knowledge.Originality/valueGiven that knowledge risks are a field with fragmented understanding, the results contribute to understanding the importance of risk management related to knowledge in times of crises and turmoil. The authors call for incorporating this niche into the overall risk management of the organization, while adopting a holistic and long-term perspective of KM. Furthermore, the authors uncover KM’s position in KIOs during the global pandemic. The paper proposes food for thought regarding informal knowledge sharing in virtual environments typical of the “Corona routine”.","PeriodicalId":53152,"journal":{"name":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivations for the initiation of knowledge management activities in times of routine and emergency\",\"authors\":\"Maayan Nakash, D. Bouhnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ajim-10-2022-0458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis research seeks to understand, for the first time, what motivates knowledge-intensive organizations (KIOs) to initiate knowledge management (KM) activities in times of routine and emergency. The COVID-19 pandemic was placed at the center as a case study of an extreme crisis.Design/methodology/approachBased on the adoption of the qualitative-constructivist paradigm, the study was conducted among 52 KM professionals through in-depth interviews and focus groups. The data were analyzed using a thematic analysis method, according to the principles of the grounded theory approach.FindingsThe findings reveal that opportunities and risks are two types of catalysts which accelerate KM efforts in times of routine and emergency respectively. Due to KM’s support of the transition to flexible employment during COVID-19, the authors show that this field experienced real growth and prosperity in the “new normal.” KM initiatives were promoted during the COVID-19 crisis in light of gaps in retention, sharing, accessibility and development of knowledge.Originality/valueGiven that knowledge risks are a field with fragmented understanding, the results contribute to understanding the importance of risk management related to knowledge in times of crises and turmoil. The authors call for incorporating this niche into the overall risk management of the organization, while adopting a holistic and long-term perspective of KM. Furthermore, the authors uncover KM’s position in KIOs during the global pandemic. The paper proposes food for thought regarding informal knowledge sharing in virtual environments typical of the “Corona routine”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aslib Journal of Information Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aslib Journal of Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-10-2022-0458\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-10-2022-0458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究首次试图了解知识密集型组织在日常和紧急情况下发起知识管理活动的动机。新冠肺炎大流行被置于中心,作为极端危机的案例研究。设计/方法论/方法基于定性建构主义范式,该研究通过深入访谈和焦点小组在52名知识管理专业人员中进行。根据扎根理论方法的原则,使用专题分析方法对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,机遇和风险是两种催化剂,分别在日常和紧急情况下加速知识管理工作。由于知识管理在新冠肺炎期间支持向灵活就业过渡,作者表明,该领域在“新常态”中经历了真正的增长和繁荣。在新冠肺炎危机期间,鉴于知识的保留、共享、可及性和发展方面的差距,知识管理举措得到了推动。原创性/价值鉴于知识风险是一个理解零散的领域,研究结果有助于理解在危机和动荡时期与知识相关的风险管理的重要性。作者呼吁将这一利基纳入组织的整体风险管理,同时对知识管理采取整体和长期的视角。此外,作者揭示了知识管理在全球疫情期间KIO中的地位。本文提出了在典型的“科罗纳常规”虚拟环境中进行非正式知识共享的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Motivations for the initiation of knowledge management activities in times of routine and emergency
PurposeThis research seeks to understand, for the first time, what motivates knowledge-intensive organizations (KIOs) to initiate knowledge management (KM) activities in times of routine and emergency. The COVID-19 pandemic was placed at the center as a case study of an extreme crisis.Design/methodology/approachBased on the adoption of the qualitative-constructivist paradigm, the study was conducted among 52 KM professionals through in-depth interviews and focus groups. The data were analyzed using a thematic analysis method, according to the principles of the grounded theory approach.FindingsThe findings reveal that opportunities and risks are two types of catalysts which accelerate KM efforts in times of routine and emergency respectively. Due to KM’s support of the transition to flexible employment during COVID-19, the authors show that this field experienced real growth and prosperity in the “new normal.” KM initiatives were promoted during the COVID-19 crisis in light of gaps in retention, sharing, accessibility and development of knowledge.Originality/valueGiven that knowledge risks are a field with fragmented understanding, the results contribute to understanding the importance of risk management related to knowledge in times of crises and turmoil. The authors call for incorporating this niche into the overall risk management of the organization, while adopting a holistic and long-term perspective of KM. Furthermore, the authors uncover KM’s position in KIOs during the global pandemic. The paper proposes food for thought regarding informal knowledge sharing in virtual environments typical of the “Corona routine”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Aslib Journal of Information Management COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
19.20%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Aslib Journal of Information Management covers a broad range of issues in the field, including economic, behavioural, social, ethical, technological, international, business-related, political and management-orientated factors. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work. Aslib Journal of Information Management Areas of interest include topics such as social media, data protection, search engines, information retrieval, digital libraries, information behaviour, intellectual property and copyright, information industry, digital repositories and information policy and governance.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of team engagement on patient satisfaction: insights from social support and transactive memory system Factors affecting user intention to use social commerce continuously from a habit perspective What decision-making process do mHealth users go through when faced with privacy disclosure behaviors? A dual trade-off perspective Collaborative online shopping: customer satisfaction and the influence of product type, gender and involvement An associative text analyzer to facilitate effectiveness of exploring historical texts for digital humanities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1