通过对菲律宾海洋保护区(MPAs)的两个实例分析,通过MEAT数据库、评估系统和基于社区的管理,观察了菲律宾海洋保护区(MPAs)的现状

IF 1 Q4 ECOLOGY Tropics Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.3759/TROPICS.MS16-04
Yuta Ito, M. Toda, M. Masuda
{"title":"通过对菲律宾海洋保护区(MPAs)的两个实例分析,通过MEAT数据库、评估系统和基于社区的管理,观察了菲律宾海洋保护区(MPAs)的现状","authors":"Yuta Ito, M. Toda, M. Masuda","doi":"10.3759/TROPICS.MS16-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well recognized that the marine resources of the Philippines are increasingly and severely damaged by climate change and human interventions, including overfishing and destructive fishing. To manage its marine resources, the government has implemented marine protected area (MPA) systems, expecting the involvement of local communities in its management. Although over 1,600 MPAs had been established by 2014, it is reported that they are not effectively managed. The purpose of the study is to determine the current conditions of MPAs in the Philippines using the MPA Management Effectiveness Assessment Tool (MEAT) developed in 2010, and to identify how MEAT reflects reality through interviews at two MPAs. The MEAT data analysis shows that MEAT has not yet been fully utilized and its information is not representative of all the MPAs in the country. So far, as based on the information provided by MEAT, less than half of the MPAs are effectively managed and management effectiveness is not related to the age of the MPA or evenly distributed across regions. The field study, although limited by the fact that it is based on only two MPAs, raises the question as to whether or not local evaluation has been conducted as intended. Unlike the high expectations of communities as effective MPA management entities, local people in the two cases rely more on local government. The results suggest the necessity of further studies on monitoring the MEAT evaluation process and the importance of field studies regarding the effectiveness of community-based MPA management.","PeriodicalId":51890,"journal":{"name":"Tropics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3759/TROPICS.MS16-04","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conditions of marine protected areas (MPAs) in the Philippines observed through the MEAT database and a reality of evaluation system and the community based management in two MPA cases\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Ito, M. Toda, M. Masuda\",\"doi\":\"10.3759/TROPICS.MS16-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well recognized that the marine resources of the Philippines are increasingly and severely damaged by climate change and human interventions, including overfishing and destructive fishing. To manage its marine resources, the government has implemented marine protected area (MPA) systems, expecting the involvement of local communities in its management. Although over 1,600 MPAs had been established by 2014, it is reported that they are not effectively managed. The purpose of the study is to determine the current conditions of MPAs in the Philippines using the MPA Management Effectiveness Assessment Tool (MEAT) developed in 2010, and to identify how MEAT reflects reality through interviews at two MPAs. The MEAT data analysis shows that MEAT has not yet been fully utilized and its information is not representative of all the MPAs in the country. So far, as based on the information provided by MEAT, less than half of the MPAs are effectively managed and management effectiveness is not related to the age of the MPA or evenly distributed across regions. The field study, although limited by the fact that it is based on only two MPAs, raises the question as to whether or not local evaluation has been conducted as intended. Unlike the high expectations of communities as effective MPA management entities, local people in the two cases rely more on local government. The results suggest the necessity of further studies on monitoring the MEAT evaluation process and the importance of field studies regarding the effectiveness of community-based MPA management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3759/TROPICS.MS16-04\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3759/TROPICS.MS16-04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3759/TROPICS.MS16-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

众所周知,气候变化和人为干预,包括过度捕捞和破坏性捕捞,对菲律宾的海洋资源造成越来越严重的破坏。为了管理其海洋资源,政府实施了海洋保护区(MPA)系统,希望当地社区参与其管理。尽管到2014年已经建立了1600多个海洋保护区,但据报道,这些保护区没有得到有效管理。本研究的目的是使用2010年开发的MPA管理有效性评估工具(MEAT)来确定菲律宾MPA的现状,并通过对两个MPA的访谈来确定MEAT如何反映现实。多边环境协定数据分析表明,多边环境协定尚未得到充分利用,其信息也不能代表该国所有的多边环境协定。到目前为止,根据多边环境协定提供的信息,只有不到一半的海洋保护区得到了有效管理,管理有效性与海洋保护区的年龄无关,也与各地区的平均分布无关。尽管实地研究仅基于两个MPA这一事实,但它提出了一个问题,即当地评估是否按预期进行。与社区作为有效的MPA管理实体的高期望不同,在这两种情况下,当地人更多地依赖地方政府。研究结果表明,有必要对监测多边环境协定评估过程进行进一步研究,并对社区MPA管理的有效性进行实地研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conditions of marine protected areas (MPAs) in the Philippines observed through the MEAT database and a reality of evaluation system and the community based management in two MPA cases
It is well recognized that the marine resources of the Philippines are increasingly and severely damaged by climate change and human interventions, including overfishing and destructive fishing. To manage its marine resources, the government has implemented marine protected area (MPA) systems, expecting the involvement of local communities in its management. Although over 1,600 MPAs had been established by 2014, it is reported that they are not effectively managed. The purpose of the study is to determine the current conditions of MPAs in the Philippines using the MPA Management Effectiveness Assessment Tool (MEAT) developed in 2010, and to identify how MEAT reflects reality through interviews at two MPAs. The MEAT data analysis shows that MEAT has not yet been fully utilized and its information is not representative of all the MPAs in the country. So far, as based on the information provided by MEAT, less than half of the MPAs are effectively managed and management effectiveness is not related to the age of the MPA or evenly distributed across regions. The field study, although limited by the fact that it is based on only two MPAs, raises the question as to whether or not local evaluation has been conducted as intended. Unlike the high expectations of communities as effective MPA management entities, local people in the two cases rely more on local government. The results suggest the necessity of further studies on monitoring the MEAT evaluation process and the importance of field studies regarding the effectiveness of community-based MPA management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropics
Tropics ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Influence of the light environment, cutting size, and existence of roots on the survival and regrowth of an invasive species, Epipremnum aureum Size-related changes in leaf, wood, and bark traits in even-aged Falcataria falcata trees Forest structure and recovery in selectively logged forests in Sarawak, Malaysia Effects of phosphorus addition on leaf litter decomposition in two tropical tree plantations in Thailand Socioeconomic aspects of utilizing non-timber forest products in Myanmar: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1