{"title":"殖民历史与文化政治的叙述方法——日本台湾文学研究","authors":"Zhao Jing-hua","doi":"10.3868/S010-006-017-0033-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting with the debate on Taiwanese national consciousness between Chen Yingzhen and Japanese scholar Shozo Fujii, and Chen’s supporter Masayoshi Matsunaga around 2004, the paper examines the historiography of Taiwanese literature studies since postwar Japan. It is argued that Shozo Fujii’s study of Taiwanese literature during the Japanese occupation period is different from Yoshinori Kobayashi’s On Taiwan , which deliberately seeks to erase the sin of colonial rule. However, in applying Western theories mechanically it is indeed easy to end up on the opposite side of historical criticism, for the reason Shozo Fujii did not provide a necessary alert to the crux in Anderson’s theory. The argumentation among the three parties not only involves how to understand Taiwanese history and literature in the complex structure of East Asia, but more importantly about how to make value judgments regarding two hundred years of colonialism.","PeriodicalId":53910,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Literary Studies in China","volume":"11 1","pages":"583-597"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Narrative Method of Colonial History and Cultural Politics—Taiwanese Literature Studies in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Zhao Jing-hua\",\"doi\":\"10.3868/S010-006-017-0033-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Starting with the debate on Taiwanese national consciousness between Chen Yingzhen and Japanese scholar Shozo Fujii, and Chen’s supporter Masayoshi Matsunaga around 2004, the paper examines the historiography of Taiwanese literature studies since postwar Japan. It is argued that Shozo Fujii’s study of Taiwanese literature during the Japanese occupation period is different from Yoshinori Kobayashi’s On Taiwan , which deliberately seeks to erase the sin of colonial rule. However, in applying Western theories mechanically it is indeed easy to end up on the opposite side of historical criticism, for the reason Shozo Fujii did not provide a necessary alert to the crux in Anderson’s theory. The argumentation among the three parties not only involves how to understand Taiwanese history and literature in the complex structure of East Asia, but more importantly about how to make value judgments regarding two hundred years of colonialism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Literary Studies in China\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"583-597\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Literary Studies in China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3868/S010-006-017-0033-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Literary Studies in China","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S010-006-017-0033-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Narrative Method of Colonial History and Cultural Politics—Taiwanese Literature Studies in Japan
Starting with the debate on Taiwanese national consciousness between Chen Yingzhen and Japanese scholar Shozo Fujii, and Chen’s supporter Masayoshi Matsunaga around 2004, the paper examines the historiography of Taiwanese literature studies since postwar Japan. It is argued that Shozo Fujii’s study of Taiwanese literature during the Japanese occupation period is different from Yoshinori Kobayashi’s On Taiwan , which deliberately seeks to erase the sin of colonial rule. However, in applying Western theories mechanically it is indeed easy to end up on the opposite side of historical criticism, for the reason Shozo Fujii did not provide a necessary alert to the crux in Anderson’s theory. The argumentation among the three parties not only involves how to understand Taiwanese history and literature in the complex structure of East Asia, but more importantly about how to make value judgments regarding two hundred years of colonialism.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers of Literature in China seeks to provide a forum for a broad blend of peer-reviewed academic papers of literature in order to promote communication and exchanges between litterateurs in China and abroad. It will reflect the enormous advances made in China in the field of literature in recent years. In addition, this journal also bears the mission of introducing the academic achievements on Chinese literature research to the world. The coverage will include the following main branches of literature, both theoretical and applied: ancient Chinese literature, modern Chinese literature and contemporary Chinese literature.