脑电图设备能否区分解决问题的正确解决方案和错误解决方案之间的注意力值?

IF 2.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Information and Telecommunication Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI:10.1080/24751839.2021.1950319
R. Bitner, N. Le
{"title":"脑电图设备能否区分解决问题的正确解决方案和错误解决方案之间的注意力值?","authors":"R. Bitner, N. Le","doi":"10.1080/24751839.2021.1950319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The affective state of an individual can be determined using physiological parameters; an important metric that can then be extracted is attention. Looking more closely at compact EEGs, algorithms have been implemented in such devices that can measure the attention and other affective states of the user. No information about these algorithms is available; are these feature classification algorithms accurate? An experiment was conducted with 23 subjects who utilized a pedagogical agent to learn the syntax of the programming language Java while having their attention measured by the NeuroSky MindWave Mobile 2. Using a concurrent validity approach, the attention values measured were compared to band powers, as well as measures of task performance. The results of the experiment were in part successful and supportive of the claim that the EEG device’s attention algorithm does in fact represent a user’s attention accurately. The results of the analysis based on raw data captured from the device were consistent with previous literature. Inconclusive results were obtained relating to task performance and attention.","PeriodicalId":32180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information and Telecommunication","volume":"6 1","pages":"121 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24751839.2021.1950319","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can EEG-devices differentiate attention values between incorrect and correct solutions for problem-solving tasks?\",\"authors\":\"R. Bitner, N. Le\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24751839.2021.1950319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The affective state of an individual can be determined using physiological parameters; an important metric that can then be extracted is attention. Looking more closely at compact EEGs, algorithms have been implemented in such devices that can measure the attention and other affective states of the user. No information about these algorithms is available; are these feature classification algorithms accurate? An experiment was conducted with 23 subjects who utilized a pedagogical agent to learn the syntax of the programming language Java while having their attention measured by the NeuroSky MindWave Mobile 2. Using a concurrent validity approach, the attention values measured were compared to band powers, as well as measures of task performance. The results of the experiment were in part successful and supportive of the claim that the EEG device’s attention algorithm does in fact represent a user’s attention accurately. The results of the analysis based on raw data captured from the device were consistent with previous literature. Inconclusive results were obtained relating to task performance and attention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information and Telecommunication\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24751839.2021.1950319\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information and Telecommunication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751839.2021.1950319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information and Telecommunication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751839.2021.1950319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要个体的情感状态可以通过生理参数来确定;然后可以提取的一个重要度量是注意力。仔细观察紧凑型脑电图,算法已经在这种设备中实现,可以测量用户的注意力和其他情感状态。没有关于这些算法的信息;这些特征分类算法准确吗?对23名受试者进行了一项实验,他们使用教学代理学习编程语言Java的语法,同时通过NeuroSky MindWave Mobile 2测量他们的注意力。使用并发有效性方法,将测量的注意力值与带功率以及任务表现的测量值进行比较。实验结果在一定程度上是成功的,并支持了脑电图设备的注意力算法实际上准确地代表了用户的注意力的说法。基于从该设备获取的原始数据的分析结果与以前的文献一致。在任务表现和注意力方面获得了不明确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can EEG-devices differentiate attention values between incorrect and correct solutions for problem-solving tasks?
ABSTRACT The affective state of an individual can be determined using physiological parameters; an important metric that can then be extracted is attention. Looking more closely at compact EEGs, algorithms have been implemented in such devices that can measure the attention and other affective states of the user. No information about these algorithms is available; are these feature classification algorithms accurate? An experiment was conducted with 23 subjects who utilized a pedagogical agent to learn the syntax of the programming language Java while having their attention measured by the NeuroSky MindWave Mobile 2. Using a concurrent validity approach, the attention values measured were compared to band powers, as well as measures of task performance. The results of the experiment were in part successful and supportive of the claim that the EEG device’s attention algorithm does in fact represent a user’s attention accurately. The results of the analysis based on raw data captured from the device were consistent with previous literature. Inconclusive results were obtained relating to task performance and attention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊最新文献
Utilizing deep learning in chipless RFID tag detection: an investigation on high-precision mm-wave spatial tag estimation from 2D virtual imaging On the performance of outage probability in cognitive NOMA random networks with hardware impairments Relay-assisted communication over a fluctuating two-ray fading channel Modified Caesar Cipher and Card Deck Shuffle Rearrangement Algorithm for Image Encryption Application of data envelopment analysis to IT project evaluation, with special emphasis on the choice of inputs and outputs in the context of the organization in question
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1