{"title":"世界没有尽头","authors":"Jacob T. Levy","doi":"10.1086/721673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even setting aside the ways in which Francis Fukuyama’s The End of History and the Last Man introduces questions that he himself pursued in his subsequent thirty years of wide-ranging scholarship, it is remarkable howmany topics in academic debates of the following generation are present in its pages. Fukuyama focused on Hegel’s (or “Hegel-Kojève’s”, as he sometimes names the hybrid theorist of most interest to him) theory of recognition in a book published contemporaneously with work by both Charles Taylor and Axel Honneth that madeHegelian recognition a central theme in political theory. But there are also, for example, discussions of the democratic peace, the limits of so-called realism in international relations, and Kant’s call for a federation of republics. These anticipate work by John Rawls a few years later, and the subsequent literature about relationships within the community of liberal democracies and between that community and the rest of the world; they also anticipate the enthusiastic visions of the European Union in the 1990s and 2000s. There are also pre-Robert Putnam worries about the decline of civil society and associational life. And, of course, the misremembered version of Fukuyama’s thesis both influenced and became a synecdoche for liberal democratic triumphalism in politics and political science alike through the","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":"54 1","pages":"802 - 809"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"World Without End\",\"authors\":\"Jacob T. Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Even setting aside the ways in which Francis Fukuyama’s The End of History and the Last Man introduces questions that he himself pursued in his subsequent thirty years of wide-ranging scholarship, it is remarkable howmany topics in academic debates of the following generation are present in its pages. Fukuyama focused on Hegel’s (or “Hegel-Kojève’s”, as he sometimes names the hybrid theorist of most interest to him) theory of recognition in a book published contemporaneously with work by both Charles Taylor and Axel Honneth that madeHegelian recognition a central theme in political theory. But there are also, for example, discussions of the democratic peace, the limits of so-called realism in international relations, and Kant’s call for a federation of republics. These anticipate work by John Rawls a few years later, and the subsequent literature about relationships within the community of liberal democracies and between that community and the rest of the world; they also anticipate the enthusiastic visions of the European Union in the 1990s and 2000s. There are also pre-Robert Putnam worries about the decline of civil society and associational life. And, of course, the misremembered version of Fukuyama’s thesis both influenced and became a synecdoche for liberal democratic triumphalism in politics and political science alike through the\",\"PeriodicalId\":46912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polity\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"802 - 809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721673\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Even setting aside the ways in which Francis Fukuyama’s The End of History and the Last Man introduces questions that he himself pursued in his subsequent thirty years of wide-ranging scholarship, it is remarkable howmany topics in academic debates of the following generation are present in its pages. Fukuyama focused on Hegel’s (or “Hegel-Kojève’s”, as he sometimes names the hybrid theorist of most interest to him) theory of recognition in a book published contemporaneously with work by both Charles Taylor and Axel Honneth that madeHegelian recognition a central theme in political theory. But there are also, for example, discussions of the democratic peace, the limits of so-called realism in international relations, and Kant’s call for a federation of republics. These anticipate work by John Rawls a few years later, and the subsequent literature about relationships within the community of liberal democracies and between that community and the rest of the world; they also anticipate the enthusiastic visions of the European Union in the 1990s and 2000s. There are also pre-Robert Putnam worries about the decline of civil society and associational life. And, of course, the misremembered version of Fukuyama’s thesis both influenced and became a synecdoche for liberal democratic triumphalism in politics and political science alike through the
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.