公民眼中的代表性:平衡公民对参与式治理中感知代表性的影响

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Pub Date : 2023-01-25 DOI:10.1080/01900692.2021.1993899
Junesoo Lee, Heungsuk Choi, Seungjoo Han
{"title":"公民眼中的代表性:平衡公民对参与式治理中感知代表性的影响","authors":"Junesoo Lee, Heungsuk Choi, Seungjoo Han","doi":"10.1080/01900692.2021.1993899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Representativeness is one of the keys to the legitimacy of participatory governance. However, such representativeness might be in the eye of the beholder due to various definitions of, and criteria for, representativeness. This study aims to explore how citizens perceive the representativeness of their representatives and the reasons behind those perceptions. Based on a survey of 2,000 citizens in South Korea, the findings indicate: (1) the maturity of citizenship (i.e., balancing tolerance and participation) significantly influences citizens’ perceptions of the representativeness of public affairs participants, and (2) this pattern of perceived representativeness does not vary according to the representativeness type (i.e., stake, stance, service, specialty, sovereign, and socio-econ) and domain (i.e., community, corporates, and government). The findings imply (1) the existence of four distinct groups of citizens – considerate reformer, reserved endurer, silent groaner, and active grumbler – and (2) the four groups of citizens are predictors of perceived representativeness.","PeriodicalId":47833,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","volume":"46 1","pages":"121 - 132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representativeness in the Eyes of the Citizen: Impact of Balanced Citizenship on the Perceived Representativeness in Participatory Governance\",\"authors\":\"Junesoo Lee, Heungsuk Choi, Seungjoo Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01900692.2021.1993899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Representativeness is one of the keys to the legitimacy of participatory governance. However, such representativeness might be in the eye of the beholder due to various definitions of, and criteria for, representativeness. This study aims to explore how citizens perceive the representativeness of their representatives and the reasons behind those perceptions. Based on a survey of 2,000 citizens in South Korea, the findings indicate: (1) the maturity of citizenship (i.e., balancing tolerance and participation) significantly influences citizens’ perceptions of the representativeness of public affairs participants, and (2) this pattern of perceived representativeness does not vary according to the representativeness type (i.e., stake, stance, service, specialty, sovereign, and socio-econ) and domain (i.e., community, corporates, and government). The findings imply (1) the existence of four distinct groups of citizens – considerate reformer, reserved endurer, silent groaner, and active grumbler – and (2) the four groups of citizens are predictors of perceived representativeness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1993899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1993899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

代表性是参与式治理合法性的关键之一。然而,由于代表性的各种定义和标准,这种代表性可能在旁观者眼中。本研究旨在探讨公民如何看待其代表的代表性,以及这些看法背后的原因。基于对韩国2000名公民的调查,研究结果表明:(1)公民身份的成熟度(即平衡容忍和参与)显著影响公民对公共事务参与者代表性的认知,以及(2)这种感知代表性的模式不会因代表性类型(即利益、立场、服务、专业、主权和社会经济)和领域(即社区、企业和政府)而变化。研究结果表明:(1)存在四个不同的公民群体——体贴的改革者、矜持的忍耐者、沉默的呻吟者和积极的抱怨者——(2)这四个公民群体是感知代表性的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Representativeness in the Eyes of the Citizen: Impact of Balanced Citizenship on the Perceived Representativeness in Participatory Governance
ABSTRACT Representativeness is one of the keys to the legitimacy of participatory governance. However, such representativeness might be in the eye of the beholder due to various definitions of, and criteria for, representativeness. This study aims to explore how citizens perceive the representativeness of their representatives and the reasons behind those perceptions. Based on a survey of 2,000 citizens in South Korea, the findings indicate: (1) the maturity of citizenship (i.e., balancing tolerance and participation) significantly influences citizens’ perceptions of the representativeness of public affairs participants, and (2) this pattern of perceived representativeness does not vary according to the representativeness type (i.e., stake, stance, service, specialty, sovereign, and socio-econ) and domain (i.e., community, corporates, and government). The findings imply (1) the existence of four distinct groups of citizens – considerate reformer, reserved endurer, silent groaner, and active grumbler – and (2) the four groups of citizens are predictors of perceived representativeness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: IJPA is an international, research-driven, and peer-reviewed publication aimed at exploring the latest developments in public administration, public policy, and management – translating theory for practice and practice into theory. IJPA is a truly global journal in scope, covering developed, emerging and transitional states, nonprofit and nongovernmental organizations, and all areas of public activity. We welcome theoretical, analytical, quantitative, qualitative, empirical, and practitioner-based, as well as individual country-based, region-based, and especially comparative works. Our target audience is not just scholars, but also policy-makers and practitioners, including aspiring public sector leaders engaged in education and research in the growing global public service, policy, and administration, and governance community.
期刊最新文献
Facebook in Local Governance: A Missed Opportunity for Two-Way Communication, Service Customization, and Democratic Enhancement Drivers for IPSAS Adoption: Context-Related Factors in Public Sector Innovation Exchanging International Lessons on Contemporary Coalition-Led Governments: Implications for the “Political-Administrative Dichotomy” Unveiling the Role of Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Hiding in Enhancing Public Service Motivation: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Organizational Structure Barriers to Freedom of Information: Insights from an Experiment in Belgium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1