{"title":"超越编纂常识:从历史制度主义到批判制度主义","authors":"Dennis Pilon","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2021.1949787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Critics argue that historical institutionalism (HI) ignores the social dimension of its research, particularly as concerns social inequality. This article tracks the problem back to the field’s implicit reliance on positivist empiricism and a narrow understanding of what constitutes a theory and argues that these unacknowledged commitments effectively block HI from addressing the issue. Instead, this article argues for critical institutionalism, drawing from nonpositivist approaches to social science research and critical social theory, and provides concrete examples of how this might be pursued.","PeriodicalId":39831,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Political Economy","volume":"102 1","pages":"101 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond codifying common sense: from an historical to critical institutionalism\",\"authors\":\"Dennis Pilon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07078552.2021.1949787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Critics argue that historical institutionalism (HI) ignores the social dimension of its research, particularly as concerns social inequality. This article tracks the problem back to the field’s implicit reliance on positivist empiricism and a narrow understanding of what constitutes a theory and argues that these unacknowledged commitments effectively block HI from addressing the issue. Instead, this article argues for critical institutionalism, drawing from nonpositivist approaches to social science research and critical social theory, and provides concrete examples of how this might be pursued.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2021.1949787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2021.1949787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond codifying common sense: from an historical to critical institutionalism
Abstract Critics argue that historical institutionalism (HI) ignores the social dimension of its research, particularly as concerns social inequality. This article tracks the problem back to the field’s implicit reliance on positivist empiricism and a narrow understanding of what constitutes a theory and argues that these unacknowledged commitments effectively block HI from addressing the issue. Instead, this article argues for critical institutionalism, drawing from nonpositivist approaches to social science research and critical social theory, and provides concrete examples of how this might be pursued.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Political Economy is an interdisciplinary journal committed to the publication of original work in the various traditions of socialist political economy. Researchers and analysts within these traditions seek to understand how political, economic and cultural processes and struggles interact to shape and reshape the conditions of people"s lives.