纺织工业的遗产,国际工业遗产保护委员会TICCIH的专题研究

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Industrial Archaeology Review Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/03090728.2023.2170606
Massimo Preite
{"title":"纺织工业的遗产,国际工业遗产保护委员会TICCIH的专题研究","authors":"Massimo Preite","doi":"10.1080/03090728.2023.2170606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In its half-century of activity (this year marks the 50th anniversary of its foundation in Ironbridge in 1973), TICCIH has consistently worked to increase the presence of industrial heritage on the UNESCO World Heritage List. The appointment of TICCIH, in 2000, as special adviser on behalf of ICOMOS for the evaluation of nominations of industrial sites to the WHL, and the publication of a series of guideline documents for the drafting of nomination dossiers to the WHL, bear witness to this commitment. These ‘thematic studies’ can be downloaded from the TICCIH or ICOMOS websites and cover different sectors of industrial heritage such as company towns, canals, railways, bridges and coal mines. The commitment to elaborate these thematic studies was reconfirmed through the Memorandum of Understanding between ICOMOS and TICCIH regarding a ‘Framework for Collaboration on the Conservation of Industrial Heritage’ signed on 10 November 2014 in Florence. It is an exhortation that has not fallen on deaf ears, if we think of the new studies published in recent years, those on the water industry (2019), on the oil industry (2020) and, finally, the last one in order of time, that on the Heritage of the Textile Industry, edited by Heike Oevermann, Bartosz Walczak and Mark Watson (2022). The three authors, due to their academic training, their scientific work and their roles in important institutions dedicated to the preservation of historical heritage, were certainly the most suitable persons to carry out a thorough survey of the heritage qualities of such a strategic sector of the modern industrial system as the textile industry. The articulate overview of its historical development on a global scale proves it: as the study claims, the textile industry, the leading sector of the industrial revolution, ‘was also the first to use new forms of power generation, finance, labour, and industrial organisation’. The structure of the book has the merit of being immediately functional for the work that requires new application files. As can easily be seen from Table 1 showing the ‘Textile sites on the World Heritage list’ (Summary and Conclusions, ch. 9, p. 183), the criteria most frequently adopted to justify their Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) are criteria (ii) and (iv). The various chapters of which the research is composed cleverly develop the issues that support the use of these two criteria. Chapter 6 — ‘International Interchange’ — offers an extremely valuable and accurate map of the ‘know-how and technology transfer’ from the ‘first-comer’ countries in the development of the textile industry to the countries that have promoted their own production through the construction of plants designed by foreign architects, engineers and investors. The merit of this survey is to show that the diffusion had many epicentres: the major role played by British expatriates in the diffusion abroad of the main technological innovations developed at home ‘especially during the earlier stages of industrial revolution’ is undoubtedly unquestionable; however, it cannot be denied that the international technological transfer is also attributable to the initiatives of German, Swiss, French and Austrian ‘agents of change’. The geography of textile know-how exports that the three authors have skilfully reconstructed represents a first-rate tool to support future nominations justified by criterion (ii): ‘to exhibit an important interchange of human values... on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town-planning or landscape design’. No less important are Chapter 4, ‘Building Types’, and chapter 5, ‘Mills and Urban Development’. Chapter 4 demonstrates, through an impressive gallery of examples found in the most diverse countries, how the typologies of the ‘multi-storey building’ and the ‘single-storey building’, both developed as solutions to the complex organisational problems posed by the development of the textile industry (‘the optimal arrangement of the machines and the interconnection of individual production departments’), are the archetypes that underlie all modern industrial architecture. Chapter 5, on the other hand, sheds light on the formative processes of the industrial city through the examination of ‘how industrial production volumes were integrated in urban spatial patterns’ and how ‘the start of dynamic growth in the textile industry’ is responsible for the formation of an unprecedented industrial landscape. Both chapters, due to their extreme wealth of references, are fully capable of providing an extensive arsenal of arguments in support of criterion (iv): ‘to be an outstanding example of a type of building, architectural or technological ensemble or landscape’. At the conclusion of their research, the three authors put together an extensive ‘Inventory of Textile Industrial Sites’ (ch. 8). Bearing in mind that Table 1 shows that there are only eight textile sites on the World Heritage List, of which only two are located outside Europe, it is easy to foresee that this inventory will have to be drawn upon for new entries, whether or not it is considered that a more ‘representative, balanced and credible’ presence of the textile industry on the World Heritage List is to be undertaken as soon as possible.","PeriodicalId":42635,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Archaeology Review","volume":"45 1","pages":"70 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Heritage of the Textile Industry, A Thematic Study for TICCIH, The International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage\",\"authors\":\"Massimo Preite\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03090728.2023.2170606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In its half-century of activity (this year marks the 50th anniversary of its foundation in Ironbridge in 1973), TICCIH has consistently worked to increase the presence of industrial heritage on the UNESCO World Heritage List. The appointment of TICCIH, in 2000, as special adviser on behalf of ICOMOS for the evaluation of nominations of industrial sites to the WHL, and the publication of a series of guideline documents for the drafting of nomination dossiers to the WHL, bear witness to this commitment. These ‘thematic studies’ can be downloaded from the TICCIH or ICOMOS websites and cover different sectors of industrial heritage such as company towns, canals, railways, bridges and coal mines. The commitment to elaborate these thematic studies was reconfirmed through the Memorandum of Understanding between ICOMOS and TICCIH regarding a ‘Framework for Collaboration on the Conservation of Industrial Heritage’ signed on 10 November 2014 in Florence. It is an exhortation that has not fallen on deaf ears, if we think of the new studies published in recent years, those on the water industry (2019), on the oil industry (2020) and, finally, the last one in order of time, that on the Heritage of the Textile Industry, edited by Heike Oevermann, Bartosz Walczak and Mark Watson (2022). The three authors, due to their academic training, their scientific work and their roles in important institutions dedicated to the preservation of historical heritage, were certainly the most suitable persons to carry out a thorough survey of the heritage qualities of such a strategic sector of the modern industrial system as the textile industry. The articulate overview of its historical development on a global scale proves it: as the study claims, the textile industry, the leading sector of the industrial revolution, ‘was also the first to use new forms of power generation, finance, labour, and industrial organisation’. The structure of the book has the merit of being immediately functional for the work that requires new application files. As can easily be seen from Table 1 showing the ‘Textile sites on the World Heritage list’ (Summary and Conclusions, ch. 9, p. 183), the criteria most frequently adopted to justify their Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) are criteria (ii) and (iv). The various chapters of which the research is composed cleverly develop the issues that support the use of these two criteria. Chapter 6 — ‘International Interchange’ — offers an extremely valuable and accurate map of the ‘know-how and technology transfer’ from the ‘first-comer’ countries in the development of the textile industry to the countries that have promoted their own production through the construction of plants designed by foreign architects, engineers and investors. The merit of this survey is to show that the diffusion had many epicentres: the major role played by British expatriates in the diffusion abroad of the main technological innovations developed at home ‘especially during the earlier stages of industrial revolution’ is undoubtedly unquestionable; however, it cannot be denied that the international technological transfer is also attributable to the initiatives of German, Swiss, French and Austrian ‘agents of change’. The geography of textile know-how exports that the three authors have skilfully reconstructed represents a first-rate tool to support future nominations justified by criterion (ii): ‘to exhibit an important interchange of human values... on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town-planning or landscape design’. No less important are Chapter 4, ‘Building Types’, and chapter 5, ‘Mills and Urban Development’. Chapter 4 demonstrates, through an impressive gallery of examples found in the most diverse countries, how the typologies of the ‘multi-storey building’ and the ‘single-storey building’, both developed as solutions to the complex organisational problems posed by the development of the textile industry (‘the optimal arrangement of the machines and the interconnection of individual production departments’), are the archetypes that underlie all modern industrial architecture. Chapter 5, on the other hand, sheds light on the formative processes of the industrial city through the examination of ‘how industrial production volumes were integrated in urban spatial patterns’ and how ‘the start of dynamic growth in the textile industry’ is responsible for the formation of an unprecedented industrial landscape. Both chapters, due to their extreme wealth of references, are fully capable of providing an extensive arsenal of arguments in support of criterion (iv): ‘to be an outstanding example of a type of building, architectural or technological ensemble or landscape’. At the conclusion of their research, the three authors put together an extensive ‘Inventory of Textile Industrial Sites’ (ch. 8). Bearing in mind that Table 1 shows that there are only eight textile sites on the World Heritage List, of which only two are located outside Europe, it is easy to foresee that this inventory will have to be drawn upon for new entries, whether or not it is considered that a more ‘representative, balanced and credible’ presence of the textile industry on the World Heritage List is to be undertaken as soon as possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial Archaeology Review\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"70 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial Archaeology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03090728.2023.2170606\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Archaeology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03090728.2023.2170606","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在其半个世纪的活动中(今年是1973年在铁桥成立50周年),TICCIH一直致力于增加联合国教科文组织世界遗产名录中工业遗产的存在。2000年,国际古迹遗址遗址遗址理事会任命香港国际遗产管理委员会为特别顾问,负责评估工业遗址列入世界遗产名录的提名,并出版了一系列起草世界遗产名录提名档案的指导文件,证明了这一承诺。这些“专题研究”可从TICCIH或ICOMOS网站下载,涵盖工业遗产的不同领域,如公司镇、运河、铁路、桥梁和煤矿。ICOMOS与TICCIH于2014年11月10日在佛罗伦萨签署了关于“工业遗产保护合作框架”的谅解备忘录,再次确认了详细阐述这些专题研究的承诺。如果我们想想近年来发表的新研究,这是一个劝告,并没有被置之不理,这些研究是关于水行业的(2019),关于石油行业的(2020),最后,按时间顺序排列的最后一个,关于纺织工业的遗产,由Heike Oevermann, Bartosz Walczak和Mark Watson编辑(2022)。这三位作者,由于他们的学术训练,他们的科学工作和他们在致力于保护历史遗产的重要机构中的角色,当然是对现代工业体系中纺织工业这样一个战略部门的遗产质量进行彻底调查的最合适人选。在全球范围内对其历史发展的清晰概述证明了这一点:正如该研究所声称的那样,纺织工业作为工业革命的主导部门,“也是第一个使用新形式的发电、金融、劳动力和工业组织”。本书的结构的优点是,对于需要新应用程序文件的工作,它可以立即发挥作用。从表1“世界遗产名录上的纺织遗址”(摘要与结论,第9章,第183页)可以很容易地看出,最常用于证明其突出普遍价值(OUV)的标准是标准(ii)和标准(iv)。本研究的各个章节都巧妙地发展了支持这两个标准使用的问题。第6章-“国际交流”-提供了一个非常有价值和准确的“知识和技术转移”的地图,从纺织工业发展的“先来后到”国家到通过建造由外国建筑师、工程师和投资者设计的工厂来促进本国生产的国家。这项调查的优点是表明,扩散有许多震中:英国侨民在国内发展的主要技术创新向国外扩散中发挥的主要作用,“特别是在工业革命的早期阶段”,这是毋庸置疑的;然而,不可否认的是,国际技术转让也可归因于德国、瑞士、法国和奥地利的“变革推动者”的倡议。三位作者巧妙地重建了纺织技术出口的地理位置,这是支持未来提名的一流工具,其标准(ii)是:“展示人类价值观的重要交流……关于建筑或技术、纪念性艺术、城市规划或景观设计的发展。同样重要的还有第4章“建筑类型”和第5章“磨坊与城市发展”。第四章通过在不同国家发现的令人印象深刻的例子,展示了“多层建筑”和“单层建筑”的类型学是如何发展起来的,它们都是解决纺织工业发展所带来的复杂组织问题的解决方案(“机器的最佳安排和各个生产部门的互连”),是所有现代工业建筑的基础原型。另一方面,第五章通过考察“工业生产量如何融入城市空间格局”和“纺织业动态增长的开始”如何导致前所未有的工业景观的形成,揭示了工业城市的形成过程。这两章,由于它们极其丰富的参考资料,完全有能力提供广泛的论据来支持标准(iv):“成为一种建筑、建筑或技术组合或景观的杰出范例”。在他们的研究结束时,三位作者整理了一份广泛的“纺织工业遗址清单”(第8章)。 请记住,表1显示,世界遗产名录上只有8个纺织遗址,其中只有两个位于欧洲以外,很容易预见,无论是否认为纺织工业在世界遗产名录上的“代表性、平衡性和可信度”将尽快进行,都必须利用这一清单来增加新的条目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Heritage of the Textile Industry, A Thematic Study for TICCIH, The International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage
In its half-century of activity (this year marks the 50th anniversary of its foundation in Ironbridge in 1973), TICCIH has consistently worked to increase the presence of industrial heritage on the UNESCO World Heritage List. The appointment of TICCIH, in 2000, as special adviser on behalf of ICOMOS for the evaluation of nominations of industrial sites to the WHL, and the publication of a series of guideline documents for the drafting of nomination dossiers to the WHL, bear witness to this commitment. These ‘thematic studies’ can be downloaded from the TICCIH or ICOMOS websites and cover different sectors of industrial heritage such as company towns, canals, railways, bridges and coal mines. The commitment to elaborate these thematic studies was reconfirmed through the Memorandum of Understanding between ICOMOS and TICCIH regarding a ‘Framework for Collaboration on the Conservation of Industrial Heritage’ signed on 10 November 2014 in Florence. It is an exhortation that has not fallen on deaf ears, if we think of the new studies published in recent years, those on the water industry (2019), on the oil industry (2020) and, finally, the last one in order of time, that on the Heritage of the Textile Industry, edited by Heike Oevermann, Bartosz Walczak and Mark Watson (2022). The three authors, due to their academic training, their scientific work and their roles in important institutions dedicated to the preservation of historical heritage, were certainly the most suitable persons to carry out a thorough survey of the heritage qualities of such a strategic sector of the modern industrial system as the textile industry. The articulate overview of its historical development on a global scale proves it: as the study claims, the textile industry, the leading sector of the industrial revolution, ‘was also the first to use new forms of power generation, finance, labour, and industrial organisation’. The structure of the book has the merit of being immediately functional for the work that requires new application files. As can easily be seen from Table 1 showing the ‘Textile sites on the World Heritage list’ (Summary and Conclusions, ch. 9, p. 183), the criteria most frequently adopted to justify their Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) are criteria (ii) and (iv). The various chapters of which the research is composed cleverly develop the issues that support the use of these two criteria. Chapter 6 — ‘International Interchange’ — offers an extremely valuable and accurate map of the ‘know-how and technology transfer’ from the ‘first-comer’ countries in the development of the textile industry to the countries that have promoted their own production through the construction of plants designed by foreign architects, engineers and investors. The merit of this survey is to show that the diffusion had many epicentres: the major role played by British expatriates in the diffusion abroad of the main technological innovations developed at home ‘especially during the earlier stages of industrial revolution’ is undoubtedly unquestionable; however, it cannot be denied that the international technological transfer is also attributable to the initiatives of German, Swiss, French and Austrian ‘agents of change’. The geography of textile know-how exports that the three authors have skilfully reconstructed represents a first-rate tool to support future nominations justified by criterion (ii): ‘to exhibit an important interchange of human values... on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town-planning or landscape design’. No less important are Chapter 4, ‘Building Types’, and chapter 5, ‘Mills and Urban Development’. Chapter 4 demonstrates, through an impressive gallery of examples found in the most diverse countries, how the typologies of the ‘multi-storey building’ and the ‘single-storey building’, both developed as solutions to the complex organisational problems posed by the development of the textile industry (‘the optimal arrangement of the machines and the interconnection of individual production departments’), are the archetypes that underlie all modern industrial architecture. Chapter 5, on the other hand, sheds light on the formative processes of the industrial city through the examination of ‘how industrial production volumes were integrated in urban spatial patterns’ and how ‘the start of dynamic growth in the textile industry’ is responsible for the formation of an unprecedented industrial landscape. Both chapters, due to their extreme wealth of references, are fully capable of providing an extensive arsenal of arguments in support of criterion (iv): ‘to be an outstanding example of a type of building, architectural or technological ensemble or landscape’. At the conclusion of their research, the three authors put together an extensive ‘Inventory of Textile Industrial Sites’ (ch. 8). Bearing in mind that Table 1 shows that there are only eight textile sites on the World Heritage List, of which only two are located outside Europe, it is easy to foresee that this inventory will have to be drawn upon for new entries, whether or not it is considered that a more ‘representative, balanced and credible’ presence of the textile industry on the World Heritage List is to be undertaken as soon as possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
66.70%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Industrial Archaeology Review aims to publish research in industrial archaeology, which is defined as a period study embracing the tangible evidence of social, economic and technological development in the period since industrialisation, generally from the early-18th century onwards. It is a peer-reviewed academic journal, with scholarly standards of presentation, yet seeks to encourage submissions from both amateurs and professionals which will inform all those working in the field of current developments. Industrial Archaeology Review is the journal of the Association for Industrial Archaeology. Published twice a year, the focal point and common theme of its contents is the surviving evidence of industrial activity.
期刊最新文献
The Buildings of the Malting Industry: the Production of Malt from Prehistory to the 21st Century Dam Construction, Company Towns and Planned Urban Development: The Example of Salto del Esla, Spain Resolving an Enigma: The Discovery of a Continuous Annular Tunnel Kiln at the Royal Doulton Potteries, Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent Rediscovering Copperopolis: The Hafod Plate Rolling Mill, Swansea The Coming of the Railway: A New Global History, 1750–1850
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1