知道和不知道生育能力:无子女妇女与年龄相关的生育能力下降

IF 0.7 Q4 GERONTOLOGY Anthropology & Aging Pub Date : 2021-05-11 DOI:10.5195/AA.2021.259
L. Martin
{"title":"知道和不知道生育能力:无子女妇女与年龄相关的生育能力下降","authors":"L. Martin","doi":"10.5195/AA.2021.259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge claims may play an essential role in reproductive decision-making, as individuals seek out, assess, reject, and use information about health and fertility gathered from numerous sources. This paper focuses specifically on childless women’s self-perceptions of knowledge about infertility and age-related fertility decline. How knowledgeable do childless women perceive themselves to be about fertility and infertility in general, and from where they do they obtain this knowledge? Furthermore, how knowledgeable do childless women perceive themselves to be about their own fertility and ability to conceive, and to what do they attribute this knowledge? Data for this project was gathered through semi-structured interviews with 72 childless American women; the interviews were inductively and thematically coded using qualitative-analysis software. Childless women assessed their general knowledge of fertility as  confident ,  self-doubting , or  novices , and they claimed multiple sources as the basis of this knowledge, including formal education and training, media and popular culture, and family members and peers. When assessing knowledge about their own fecundity, the women tended to rely on two additional sources: biomedical diagnostics and embodied knowledge. Childless women’s awareness of average statistics of age-related fertility decline did not necessarily translate to individual self-knowledge about their own bodies and fecundity. Because knowledge claims were based on multiple information sources given unequal weight, this raises questions about authoritative knowledge—that is, the knowledge that “counts” for women as they make decisions regarding their future childbearing.","PeriodicalId":42395,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology & Aging","volume":"42 1","pages":"30-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowing and Not Knowing about Fertility: Childless Women and Age-Related Fertility Decline\",\"authors\":\"L. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/AA.2021.259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Knowledge claims may play an essential role in reproductive decision-making, as individuals seek out, assess, reject, and use information about health and fertility gathered from numerous sources. This paper focuses specifically on childless women’s self-perceptions of knowledge about infertility and age-related fertility decline. How knowledgeable do childless women perceive themselves to be about fertility and infertility in general, and from where they do they obtain this knowledge? Furthermore, how knowledgeable do childless women perceive themselves to be about their own fertility and ability to conceive, and to what do they attribute this knowledge? Data for this project was gathered through semi-structured interviews with 72 childless American women; the interviews were inductively and thematically coded using qualitative-analysis software. Childless women assessed their general knowledge of fertility as  confident ,  self-doubting , or  novices , and they claimed multiple sources as the basis of this knowledge, including formal education and training, media and popular culture, and family members and peers. When assessing knowledge about their own fecundity, the women tended to rely on two additional sources: biomedical diagnostics and embodied knowledge. Childless women’s awareness of average statistics of age-related fertility decline did not necessarily translate to individual self-knowledge about their own bodies and fecundity. Because knowledge claims were based on multiple information sources given unequal weight, this raises questions about authoritative knowledge—that is, the knowledge that “counts” for women as they make decisions regarding their future childbearing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology & Aging\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"30-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/AA.2021.259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/AA.2021.259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

知识主张可能在生殖决策中发挥重要作用,因为个人寻求、评估、拒绝和使用从众多来源收集的有关健康和生育的信息。本文特别关注无子女妇女对不孕不育知识的自我认知和与年龄相关的生育能力下降。没有孩子的妇女认为自己对生育和不孕症有多了解?她们从哪里获得这些知识?此外,没有孩子的女性认为自己对自己的生育能力和怀孕能力了解多少?她们把这些知识归功于什么?这个项目的数据是通过对72名没有孩子的美国妇女的半结构化访谈收集的;使用定性分析软件对访谈进行归纳和主题编码。没有孩子的妇女认为她们对生育的一般知识是自信的、自我怀疑的或新手的,她们声称有多种来源作为这些知识的基础,包括正规教育和培训、媒体和流行文化、家庭成员和同龄人。在评估关于自己生育能力的知识时,女性倾向于依赖两个额外的来源:生物医学诊断和具体化知识。没有孩子的妇女对与年龄有关的生育率下降的平均统计数据的认识并不一定转化为对自己身体和生育能力的个人自我认识。因为知识主张是建立在多重信息来源的基础上的,而这些信息的权重是不平等的,这就提出了关于权威知识的问题——也就是说,女性在决定未来生育时“重要”的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowing and Not Knowing about Fertility: Childless Women and Age-Related Fertility Decline
Knowledge claims may play an essential role in reproductive decision-making, as individuals seek out, assess, reject, and use information about health and fertility gathered from numerous sources. This paper focuses specifically on childless women’s self-perceptions of knowledge about infertility and age-related fertility decline. How knowledgeable do childless women perceive themselves to be about fertility and infertility in general, and from where they do they obtain this knowledge? Furthermore, how knowledgeable do childless women perceive themselves to be about their own fertility and ability to conceive, and to what do they attribute this knowledge? Data for this project was gathered through semi-structured interviews with 72 childless American women; the interviews were inductively and thematically coded using qualitative-analysis software. Childless women assessed their general knowledge of fertility as  confident ,  self-doubting , or  novices , and they claimed multiple sources as the basis of this knowledge, including formal education and training, media and popular culture, and family members and peers. When assessing knowledge about their own fecundity, the women tended to rely on two additional sources: biomedical diagnostics and embodied knowledge. Childless women’s awareness of average statistics of age-related fertility decline did not necessarily translate to individual self-knowledge about their own bodies and fecundity. Because knowledge claims were based on multiple information sources given unequal weight, this raises questions about authoritative knowledge—that is, the knowledge that “counts” for women as they make decisions regarding their future childbearing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropology & Aging
Anthropology & Aging GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
10
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Comparative Insights from the ASSA Project Digital Dependency as a Burden: Impact of Active Aging for Tech Adoption in Brazil and Chile Book Review: Fragile Resonance: Caring for Older Family Members in Japan and England Life Purpose in the Age of the Smartphone: Reflections from Comparative Anthropology Book Review: Being Single in India: Stories of Gender, Exclusion, and Possibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1