{"title":"废话在管理学研究中的胜利:评论","authors":"K. Peters, H. Thomas","doi":"10.5465/amle.2020.0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professor Dennis Tourish’s recent essay ( AMLE , March 2020) provides an analysis of why business schools and management education are perceived to be in a state of crisis. This commentary focuses on one important aspect of Tourish’s criticism of the management education field; namely, the quality, value, and appropriateness of the field’s research in advancing knowledge. His main criticisms are that the failure of management research arises from its extremely strong focus on theory development, its inadequate writing, and the formulaic, template style and formal structure of research papers in leading journals. Indeed, the rules and practices underlying the development of this portfolio of management research seems to have been defined by academia itself.","PeriodicalId":48152,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Learning & Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Triumph of Nonsense in Management Studies: A Commentary\",\"authors\":\"K. Peters, H. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/amle.2020.0124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professor Dennis Tourish’s recent essay ( AMLE , March 2020) provides an analysis of why business schools and management education are perceived to be in a state of crisis. This commentary focuses on one important aspect of Tourish’s criticism of the management education field; namely, the quality, value, and appropriateness of the field’s research in advancing knowledge. His main criticisms are that the failure of management research arises from its extremely strong focus on theory development, its inadequate writing, and the formulaic, template style and formal structure of research papers in leading journals. Indeed, the rules and practices underlying the development of this portfolio of management research seems to have been defined by academia itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academy of Management Learning & Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academy of Management Learning & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Learning & Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
Dennis Tourish教授最近的一篇文章(AMLE, 2020年3月)分析了为什么商学院和管理教育被认为处于危机状态。这篇评论集中在图里什对管理教育领域的批评的一个重要方面;即,该领域研究在推进知识方面的质量、价值和适当性。他的主要批评是,管理学研究的失败源于对理论发展的过分关注、写作的不足,以及主要期刊上研究论文的公式化、模版风格和正式结构。事实上,这些管理研究组合发展背后的规则和实践似乎是由学术界自己定义的。
The Triumph of Nonsense in Management Studies: A Commentary
Professor Dennis Tourish’s recent essay ( AMLE , March 2020) provides an analysis of why business schools and management education are perceived to be in a state of crisis. This commentary focuses on one important aspect of Tourish’s criticism of the management education field; namely, the quality, value, and appropriateness of the field’s research in advancing knowledge. His main criticisms are that the failure of management research arises from its extremely strong focus on theory development, its inadequate writing, and the formulaic, template style and formal structure of research papers in leading journals. Indeed, the rules and practices underlying the development of this portfolio of management research seems to have been defined by academia itself.
期刊介绍:
AMLE’s mission is to contribute to management learning and education by publishing theory, empirical research, reviews, critiques, and resources that address the processes of management teaching and the learning that results from it. Additionally, AMLE publishes work that addresses important issues in the institutional environment and administration of business schools and their stakeholders. The journal’s emphasis is on the study of management learning and education in all types of settings—schools and universities as well as businesses and public and non-profit organizations. AMLE is quarterly in March, June, September, and December.