废话在管理学研究中的胜利:评论

IF 4.8 2区 管理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Academy of Management Learning & Education Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.5465/amle.2020.0124
K. Peters, H. Thomas
{"title":"废话在管理学研究中的胜利:评论","authors":"K. Peters, H. Thomas","doi":"10.5465/amle.2020.0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professor Dennis Tourish’s recent essay ( AMLE , March 2020) provides an analysis of why business schools and management education are perceived to be in a state of crisis. This commentary focuses on one important aspect of Tourish’s criticism of the management education field; namely, the quality, value, and appropriateness of the field’s research in advancing knowledge. His main criticisms are that the failure of management research arises from its extremely strong focus on theory development, its inadequate writing, and the formulaic, template style and formal structure of research papers in leading journals. Indeed, the rules and practices underlying the development of this portfolio of management research seems to have been defined by academia itself.","PeriodicalId":48152,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Learning & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Triumph of Nonsense in Management Studies: A Commentary\",\"authors\":\"K. Peters, H. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/amle.2020.0124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professor Dennis Tourish’s recent essay ( AMLE , March 2020) provides an analysis of why business schools and management education are perceived to be in a state of crisis. This commentary focuses on one important aspect of Tourish’s criticism of the management education field; namely, the quality, value, and appropriateness of the field’s research in advancing knowledge. His main criticisms are that the failure of management research arises from its extremely strong focus on theory development, its inadequate writing, and the formulaic, template style and formal structure of research papers in leading journals. Indeed, the rules and practices underlying the development of this portfolio of management research seems to have been defined by academia itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academy of Management Learning & Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academy of Management Learning & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Learning & Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

Dennis Tourish教授最近的一篇文章(AMLE, 2020年3月)分析了为什么商学院和管理教育被认为处于危机状态。这篇评论集中在图里什对管理教育领域的批评的一个重要方面;即,该领域研究在推进知识方面的质量、价值和适当性。他的主要批评是,管理学研究的失败源于对理论发展的过分关注、写作的不足,以及主要期刊上研究论文的公式化、模版风格和正式结构。事实上,这些管理研究组合发展背后的规则和实践似乎是由学术界自己定义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Triumph of Nonsense in Management Studies: A Commentary
Professor Dennis Tourish’s recent essay ( AMLE , March 2020) provides an analysis of why business schools and management education are perceived to be in a state of crisis. This commentary focuses on one important aspect of Tourish’s criticism of the management education field; namely, the quality, value, and appropriateness of the field’s research in advancing knowledge. His main criticisms are that the failure of management research arises from its extremely strong focus on theory development, its inadequate writing, and the formulaic, template style and formal structure of research papers in leading journals. Indeed, the rules and practices underlying the development of this portfolio of management research seems to have been defined by academia itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: AMLE’s mission is to contribute to management learning and education by publishing theory, empirical research, reviews, critiques, and resources that address the processes of management teaching and the learning that results from it. Additionally, AMLE publishes work that addresses important issues in the institutional environment and administration of business schools and their stakeholders. The journal’s emphasis is on the study of management learning and education in all types of settings—schools and universities as well as businesses and public and non-profit organizations. AMLE is quarterly in March, June, September, and December.
期刊最新文献
Constructing Ontological Foundations for Management Learning and Education Research How Ideology Shapes What We Teach about Authority: A Comparative Analysis of the Presentation of Milgram's Experiments in Textbooks Book Review: The Power of Ethics Book Review: Bringing the Neuroscience of Learning to Online Teaching: An Educator’s Handbook Book Review: Beating Burnout at Work: Why Teams Hold the Secret to Well-Being and Resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1