不听不恶,不看不恶,不说不恶:澳大利亚政府的信息保密

Kylie Weston-Scheuber
{"title":"不听不恶,不看不恶,不说不恶:澳大利亚政府的信息保密","authors":"Kylie Weston-Scheuber","doi":"10.53300/001c.34568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws together commentary and recent examples in relation to state secrecy provisions in a range of different areas, and considers the use of secrecy by the government in Australia, with some relevant comparisons to other common law countries. This extends beyond the secrecy offences that would ordinarily be referred to under the umbrella of “state secrecy” to other laws that may be utilised to keep government information secret, for example closed court orders and freedom of information exemptions. Broadly, the article outlines a series of laws and patterns of decision-making that together combine to effect an approach to the free flow of information of “Hear no evil, speak no evil, see no evil”.","PeriodicalId":33279,"journal":{"name":"Bond Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hear no Evil, See no Evil, Speak no Evil: The Secretisation of Information by Government in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Kylie Weston-Scheuber\",\"doi\":\"10.53300/001c.34568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article draws together commentary and recent examples in relation to state secrecy provisions in a range of different areas, and considers the use of secrecy by the government in Australia, with some relevant comparisons to other common law countries. This extends beyond the secrecy offences that would ordinarily be referred to under the umbrella of “state secrecy” to other laws that may be utilised to keep government information secret, for example closed court orders and freedom of information exemptions. Broadly, the article outlines a series of laws and patterns of decision-making that together combine to effect an approach to the free flow of information of “Hear no evil, speak no evil, see no evil”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bond Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bond Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.34568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bond Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.34568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文汇集了一系列不同领域有关国家保密条款的评论和最新案例,并考虑了澳大利亚政府对保密条款的使用,并与其他普通法国家进行了一些相关比较。这超出了通常在“国家保密”的保护伞下提及的保密罪,延伸到可能用于保密政府信息的其他法律,例如非公开法庭命令和信息自由豁免。从广义上讲,本文概述了一系列的规律和决策模式,这些规律和模式共同作用,实现了“不听不恶,不言不恶,不视不恶”的信息自由流动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hear no Evil, See no Evil, Speak no Evil: The Secretisation of Information by Government in Australia
This article draws together commentary and recent examples in relation to state secrecy provisions in a range of different areas, and considers the use of secrecy by the government in Australia, with some relevant comparisons to other common law countries. This extends beyond the secrecy offences that would ordinarily be referred to under the umbrella of “state secrecy” to other laws that may be utilised to keep government information secret, for example closed court orders and freedom of information exemptions. Broadly, the article outlines a series of laws and patterns of decision-making that together combine to effect an approach to the free flow of information of “Hear no evil, speak no evil, see no evil”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
‘Often Fails to Give Close Attention to Detail’: Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Criminal Justice Offender Populations A Practitioner’s Perspective Concerning the Links between Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and the Criminal Justice System Understanding the Nature of ADHD and the Vulnerability of Those with the Condition Who Fall Foul of the Criminal Justice System Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy Legal Considerations in Machine-Assisted Decision-Making: Planning and Building as a Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1