金融全球化及其对投资组合风险分散的影响

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Investing Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI:10.3905/joi.2021.1.197
Ramu Thiagarajan, Jiho Han, Aaron Hurd, Hanbin Im, Gaurav Mallik
{"title":"金融全球化及其对投资组合风险分散的影响","authors":"Ramu Thiagarajan, Jiho Han, Aaron Hurd, Hanbin Im, Gaurav Mallik","doi":"10.3905/joi.2021.1.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trade disputes and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global supply chains have drawn much attention to the notion of “deglobalization.” The common concern is that the steady trend of globalization and its many benefits may reverse. But the globalization trend is not a monolith. In this article, we show that although trade globalization has stalled since the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), financial globalization has continued to increase. We further show that financial globalization has a much more significant impact on portfolios than trade globalization. The primary mechanism of this impact, US dollar hegemony, impacts portfolios primarily through increased spillover of US monetary policy shocks. The two implications for investors are: (1) global equity markets have become increasingly correlated and are likely to stay that way, and (2) this increased correlation reduces the benefits of portfolio diversification and leads to a more concentrated exposure to US monetary policy shocks. Key Findings ▪ Financial globalization has increased steadily even as trade globalization has stalled over the past decade. ▪ Increased financial globalization amplified by increased US Dollar hegemony raises the correlation of global equity markets, reduces efficacy of geographic diversification, and concentrates exposure to US monetary policy shocks. ▪ Therefore, investors must step beyond the simple equity/fixed income paradigm to consider other opportunities to diversify equity risk such as commodities, currencies, alternatives, or low volatility strategies.","PeriodicalId":45504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial Globalization and Its Implications for Diversification of Portfolio Risk\",\"authors\":\"Ramu Thiagarajan, Jiho Han, Aaron Hurd, Hanbin Im, Gaurav Mallik\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/joi.2021.1.197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trade disputes and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global supply chains have drawn much attention to the notion of “deglobalization.” The common concern is that the steady trend of globalization and its many benefits may reverse. But the globalization trend is not a monolith. In this article, we show that although trade globalization has stalled since the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), financial globalization has continued to increase. We further show that financial globalization has a much more significant impact on portfolios than trade globalization. The primary mechanism of this impact, US dollar hegemony, impacts portfolios primarily through increased spillover of US monetary policy shocks. The two implications for investors are: (1) global equity markets have become increasingly correlated and are likely to stay that way, and (2) this increased correlation reduces the benefits of portfolio diversification and leads to a more concentrated exposure to US monetary policy shocks. Key Findings ▪ Financial globalization has increased steadily even as trade globalization has stalled over the past decade. ▪ Increased financial globalization amplified by increased US Dollar hegemony raises the correlation of global equity markets, reduces efficacy of geographic diversification, and concentrates exposure to US monetary policy shocks. ▪ Therefore, investors must step beyond the simple equity/fixed income paradigm to consider other opportunities to diversify equity risk such as commodities, currencies, alternatives, or low volatility strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2021.1.197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2021.1.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

贸易争端和新冠肺炎疫情对全球供应链的影响引起了人们对“去全球化”概念的关注。人们普遍担心的是,全球化的稳定趋势及其诸多好处可能会发生逆转。但全球化趋势并不是一个庞然大物。在本文中,我们表明,尽管自全球金融危机(GFC)以来贸易全球化停滞不前,但金融全球化仍在继续增加。我们进一步表明,金融全球化对投资组合的影响要比贸易全球化显著得多。这种影响的主要机制是美元霸权,它主要通过美国货币政策冲击的外溢效应增加来影响投资组合。这对投资者的两个影响是:(1)全球股市的相关性越来越强,而且很可能保持这种状态;(2)这种相关性的增强降低了投资组合多样化的好处,导致对美国货币政策冲击的风险敞口更加集中。在过去十年中,尽管贸易全球化停滞不前,但金融全球化仍在稳步发展。•美元霸权的增强放大了金融全球化的加剧,提高了全球股票市场的相关性,降低了地域多样化的有效性,并集中了美国货币政策冲击的风险敞口。因此,投资者必须超越简单的股票/固定收益模式,考虑其他机会来分散股票风险,如商品、货币、替代品或低波动性策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Financial Globalization and Its Implications for Diversification of Portfolio Risk
Trade disputes and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global supply chains have drawn much attention to the notion of “deglobalization.” The common concern is that the steady trend of globalization and its many benefits may reverse. But the globalization trend is not a monolith. In this article, we show that although trade globalization has stalled since the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), financial globalization has continued to increase. We further show that financial globalization has a much more significant impact on portfolios than trade globalization. The primary mechanism of this impact, US dollar hegemony, impacts portfolios primarily through increased spillover of US monetary policy shocks. The two implications for investors are: (1) global equity markets have become increasingly correlated and are likely to stay that way, and (2) this increased correlation reduces the benefits of portfolio diversification and leads to a more concentrated exposure to US monetary policy shocks. Key Findings ▪ Financial globalization has increased steadily even as trade globalization has stalled over the past decade. ▪ Increased financial globalization amplified by increased US Dollar hegemony raises the correlation of global equity markets, reduces efficacy of geographic diversification, and concentrates exposure to US monetary policy shocks. ▪ Therefore, investors must step beyond the simple equity/fixed income paradigm to consider other opportunities to diversify equity risk such as commodities, currencies, alternatives, or low volatility strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Investing
Journal of Investing BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
A New Global Portfolio Weighting Strategy Based on Cointegration Methods “I Have Never Seen a Bad Backtest”: Modeling Reality in Quantitative Investing Predicting Market Risk Premiums with Historical Patterns How Many Securities Should an Active Manager hold? What Makes the Dollar Cost Averaging Strategy So Popular Today? A Critical Review of the Benefits and Risks of a Controversial Investment Scheme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1