非人性化的特征为基础的措施:适应葡萄牙人口

Lúcia Campos, Ana Louceiro, Tânia Brandão, S. Bernardes
{"title":"非人性化的特征为基础的措施:适应葡萄牙人口","authors":"Lúcia Campos, Ana Louceiro, Tânia Brandão, S. Bernardes","doi":"10.17575/psicologia.v34i1.1495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although dehumanization (i.e., the denial of full humanness to others; Haslam, 2006) has been a frequent subject in social psychology, a set of traits designed to evaluate this phenomenon has not been validated to the Portuguese population. The main purpose of this study was to translate, culturally adapt and validate a set of dehumanization traits proposed by Haslam and colleagues (Haslam & Bain, 2007; Haslam, Bain, Douge, Lee & Bastian, 2005), which measure both the denial of uniquely human and human nature traits. A sample of 597 individuals (Mage = 40.83; SD = 11.50) were asked to rate a set of 52 traits on how much they perceived each as a characteristic of human nature and human uniqueness, as well as its desirability. T-tests were conducted to distinguish between low and high rated traits in each dimension, and to construct clusters of traits that differ in each dimension. We successfully provide a measure containing positive traits in both senses of humanness dimensions; however, we were only able to validate a human uniqueness measure with negative valence. Implications of this measure for future research on dehumanization processes are discussed.","PeriodicalId":37656,"journal":{"name":"PSICOLOGIA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trait-based Measure of Dehumanization: Adaptation for the Portuguese population\",\"authors\":\"Lúcia Campos, Ana Louceiro, Tânia Brandão, S. Bernardes\",\"doi\":\"10.17575/psicologia.v34i1.1495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although dehumanization (i.e., the denial of full humanness to others; Haslam, 2006) has been a frequent subject in social psychology, a set of traits designed to evaluate this phenomenon has not been validated to the Portuguese population. The main purpose of this study was to translate, culturally adapt and validate a set of dehumanization traits proposed by Haslam and colleagues (Haslam & Bain, 2007; Haslam, Bain, Douge, Lee & Bastian, 2005), which measure both the denial of uniquely human and human nature traits. A sample of 597 individuals (Mage = 40.83; SD = 11.50) were asked to rate a set of 52 traits on how much they perceived each as a characteristic of human nature and human uniqueness, as well as its desirability. T-tests were conducted to distinguish between low and high rated traits in each dimension, and to construct clusters of traits that differ in each dimension. We successfully provide a measure containing positive traits in both senses of humanness dimensions; however, we were only able to validate a human uniqueness measure with negative valence. Implications of this measure for future research on dehumanization processes are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSICOLOGIA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSICOLOGIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.v34i1.1495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSICOLOGIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.v34i1.1495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然去人性化(即拒绝给予他人充分的人性;Haslam, 2006)一直是社会心理学中一个常见的主题,旨在评估这一现象的一系列特征尚未在葡萄牙人口中得到验证。本研究的主要目的是翻译、文化适应和验证Haslam及其同事提出的一组非人性化特征(Haslam & Bain, 2007;Haslam, Bain, Douge, Lee & Bastian, 2005),它衡量了对人类独特特征和人性特征的否认。597人的样本(Mage = 40.83;SD = 11.50)的人被要求对一组52个特征进行评分,包括他们认为这些特征在多大程度上是人性的特征,是人类的独特性,以及它们的可取性。进行t检验以区分每个维度上的低评级和高评级特征,并构建每个维度上不同的特征集群。我们成功地提供了一个包含人性两个维度的积极特征的衡量标准;然而,我们只能用负效价来验证人类独特性测量。讨论了这一措施对未来非人性化过程研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trait-based Measure of Dehumanization: Adaptation for the Portuguese population
Although dehumanization (i.e., the denial of full humanness to others; Haslam, 2006) has been a frequent subject in social psychology, a set of traits designed to evaluate this phenomenon has not been validated to the Portuguese population. The main purpose of this study was to translate, culturally adapt and validate a set of dehumanization traits proposed by Haslam and colleagues (Haslam & Bain, 2007; Haslam, Bain, Douge, Lee & Bastian, 2005), which measure both the denial of uniquely human and human nature traits. A sample of 597 individuals (Mage = 40.83; SD = 11.50) were asked to rate a set of 52 traits on how much they perceived each as a characteristic of human nature and human uniqueness, as well as its desirability. T-tests were conducted to distinguish between low and high rated traits in each dimension, and to construct clusters of traits that differ in each dimension. We successfully provide a measure containing positive traits in both senses of humanness dimensions; however, we were only able to validate a human uniqueness measure with negative valence. Implications of this measure for future research on dehumanization processes are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PSICOLOGIA
PSICOLOGIA Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The journal PSICOLOGIA publishes original research in the general scope of psychology and behavioral sciences. PSICOLOGIA welcomes empirical research contributions and literature revisions within specific scientific areas of Psychology.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between optimism, pessimism and sleep difficulties in university students: The role of cognitive emotion regulation and psychological distress Separação-individuação aos pais e resiliência nos conflitos no namoro em jovens adultos Mapping personality markers in a Portuguese sample: The factor structure, reliability and incremental validity of the Big Five Mini-Markers Disentangling perceptions of social support and social capital as social determinants of mental health: COVID-19 personal networks of immigrants and non-migrants in Portugal Latent mean differences between men and women: The case of the Preference for the Intuition and Deliberation Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1