穿孔和钻孔工艺对老化碳纤维和芳纶增强聚合物复合材料毛刺形成和分层的影响

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Transactions of The Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering Pub Date : 2023-02-08 DOI:10.1139/tcsme-2022-0150
K. E. Engin, A. Kaya, Mahmut Tandogan
{"title":"穿孔和钻孔工艺对老化碳纤维和芳纶增强聚合物复合材料毛刺形成和分层的影响","authors":"K. E. Engin, A. Kaya, Mahmut Tandogan","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2022-0150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two major problems with Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites during their machining that need to be addressed. The first concern is the delamination and formation of burrs at machined edges, and the second is the effects of aging leading to mechanical deterioration. In this study, Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) and Aramid Fiber Reinforced Polymer (AFRP) composites are manufactured by vacuum infusion method and aged for two years under natural environmental conditions. Piercing with three different clearances (1%, 5% and 10% of sheet thickness) and speed of 4m.s-1 are performed. Additionally, conventional drilling is carried out with a feed rate of 0.2 m/min, respectively. The highest delamination factor difference between piercing and drilling processes were calculated as 7.3% and 13.9% for CFRP and AFRP, respectively. The highest burr amounts for AFRP and CFRP composites are obtained as 91.5% and 39% at 10% clearance for piercing process whereas 123% and 32.1% for drilling process, respectively. Compared to drilling, piercing generates less burr formation except for CFRP composites in case of 10% clearance and more precise hole production. It is understood that piercing results significantly improves when smaller clearances up to 5% of the sheet thickness are utilized.","PeriodicalId":23285,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF PIERCING AND DRILLING PROCESSES ON BURR FORMATION AND DELAMINATION OF AGED CARBON AND ARAMID FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER COMPOSITES\",\"authors\":\"K. E. Engin, A. Kaya, Mahmut Tandogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/tcsme-2022-0150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are two major problems with Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites during their machining that need to be addressed. The first concern is the delamination and formation of burrs at machined edges, and the second is the effects of aging leading to mechanical deterioration. In this study, Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) and Aramid Fiber Reinforced Polymer (AFRP) composites are manufactured by vacuum infusion method and aged for two years under natural environmental conditions. Piercing with three different clearances (1%, 5% and 10% of sheet thickness) and speed of 4m.s-1 are performed. Additionally, conventional drilling is carried out with a feed rate of 0.2 m/min, respectively. The highest delamination factor difference between piercing and drilling processes were calculated as 7.3% and 13.9% for CFRP and AFRP, respectively. The highest burr amounts for AFRP and CFRP composites are obtained as 91.5% and 39% at 10% clearance for piercing process whereas 123% and 32.1% for drilling process, respectively. Compared to drilling, piercing generates less burr formation except for CFRP composites in case of 10% clearance and more precise hole production. It is understood that piercing results significantly improves when smaller clearances up to 5% of the sheet thickness are utilized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of The Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of The Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/tcsme-2022-0150\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/tcsme-2022-0150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纤维增强聚合物(FRP)复合材料在加工过程中有两个主要问题需要解决。第一个问题是机械加工边缘的分层和毛刺形成,第二个问题是导致机械退化的老化影响。在本研究中,采用真空灌注法制造了碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)和芳纶纤维加强聚合物(AFRP)复合材料,并在自然环境条件下老化两年。采用三种不同间隙(板材厚度的1%、5%和10%)和4m.s-1的速度进行穿孔。此外,常规钻孔分别以0.2m/min的进给速率进行。CFRP和AFRP的穿孔和钻孔过程之间的最高分层因子差异分别为7.3%和13.9%。AFRP和CFRP复合材料的最高毛刺量分别为91.5%和39%,在穿孔过程中为10%的间隙,而在钻孔过程中为123%和32.1%。与钻孔相比,在间隙为10%的情况下,除了CFRP复合材料外,穿孔产生的毛刺更少,并且产生的孔更精确。可以理解,当使用高达片材厚度5%的较小间隙时,穿孔结果显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE EFFECT OF PIERCING AND DRILLING PROCESSES ON BURR FORMATION AND DELAMINATION OF AGED CARBON AND ARAMID FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER COMPOSITES
There are two major problems with Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites during their machining that need to be addressed. The first concern is the delamination and formation of burrs at machined edges, and the second is the effects of aging leading to mechanical deterioration. In this study, Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) and Aramid Fiber Reinforced Polymer (AFRP) composites are manufactured by vacuum infusion method and aged for two years under natural environmental conditions. Piercing with three different clearances (1%, 5% and 10% of sheet thickness) and speed of 4m.s-1 are performed. Additionally, conventional drilling is carried out with a feed rate of 0.2 m/min, respectively. The highest delamination factor difference between piercing and drilling processes were calculated as 7.3% and 13.9% for CFRP and AFRP, respectively. The highest burr amounts for AFRP and CFRP composites are obtained as 91.5% and 39% at 10% clearance for piercing process whereas 123% and 32.1% for drilling process, respectively. Compared to drilling, piercing generates less burr formation except for CFRP composites in case of 10% clearance and more precise hole production. It is understood that piercing results significantly improves when smaller clearances up to 5% of the sheet thickness are utilized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1972, Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering is a quarterly journal that publishes comprehensive research articles and notes in the broad field of mechanical engineering. New advances in energy systems, biomechanics, engineering analysis and design, environmental engineering, materials technology, advanced manufacturing, mechatronics, MEMS, nanotechnology, thermo-fluids engineering, and transportation systems are featured.
期刊最新文献
Novel design and motion analysis of an omni-tread snake-like robot for narrow space inspection Dynamic Characteristics of electromechanical coupling of body-suspended drive system for high-speed trains under wheel polygonal wear Closed-Loop Control of Surface Preparation for Metallizing Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites Study on the temperature dissipation performance of brake pads with different surface patterns Experimental Evaluation of a Small-Sized Continuum Robot for Grasping Tasks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1